Friday, May 9, 2008

BRIGANDS, BANKERS AND BAGMEN (ROYAL INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS/CFR)"



The election forecasts is over in the U.S. and all that's come out of it is the people have voted for change and by God they're going to get it.



I mentioned that I would probably go through some of the founding's and the machinations of the Council on Foreign Relations the American branch of The Royal Institute of International Affairs which was setup to bring in a form of world government, a world governmental system to standardize every nation into the one system and basically to rule the people in a bureaucratic socialistic almost Communistic fashion multi-layered levels of bureaucracy while a small dominant elite who believe they are the fittest to rule and the most intelligent will make all the decisions at the capstone basically.

For the people who want to really get into this you go into "Tragedy & Hope" by the historian of the Council on Foreign Relations who lays it on the line and fills in all the spots in history between the dates and the battles that you get in school he fills in the reasons for them happening. He tells you the names of the families involved that pull the strings in all countries, all the British Commonwealth countries and the United States. Now it's even gone further because they're allowing in non-English speaking peoples. They have headquarters in Pakistan and every other country.

They own the newspapers in every country. One of their first mandates was to take over all information avenues. They also own all of the media. They're involved in the fictional type programming that we get. They also were the ones to promote professorships at universities so that they can have their men teaching the students, especially the Ivy League universities who then eventually become the higher bureaucrats in federal governments, so we are living in a tremendous cobweb all interrelated across the planet. All the little strands connecting together into a global network. They also control all the banking systems. That's another major important part of all of this.

Professor Carroll Quigley had access to the records of the Council on Foreign Relations in New York City and he was told to update them, go over them as the authorized historian for the group and he wrote "Tragedy & Hope" a book that was eventually bought over pretty quickly and the plates were smashed but now it's back in publication. You can find it if you go on the Internet.

When he's talking about the build up of the tensions which had been manipulated by the one group both from the Soviet system since they were behind it and backed financially and the west to create a form of dialectical change in peoples of both sides so that they come to the eventual synthesis we're at today where east and west become joined into this new system. He goes through this and talks about the buildup initially pre-World War II and then the trials went on to the Communist factions in the United States during the McCarthy Era and this is from his own book.


This is taken right from page 949 of Tragedy & Hope" talking about the United States.

"The radical right version of these events as written up by John T. Flynn, Frieda [Whitley] and others was even more remote from the truth than were the [Bodensee's] or Bentley's versions although it has a tremendous impact on American opinion and American relations with other countries in the years 1947 to 1955.

This radical Right fairy tale, which is now an accepted folk myth in many groups in America, pictured the recent history of the United States, in regard to domestic reform and in foreign affairs, as a well-organized plot by extreme Left-wing elements, operating from the White House itself and controlling all the chief avenues of publicity in the United States, to destroy the American way of life, based on private enterprise, laissez faire, and isolationism, in behalf of alien ideologies of Russian Socialism and British cosmopolitanism (or internationalism). This plot, if we are to believe the myth, worked through such avenues of publicity as The New York Times and the Harold Tribune, the Christian Science Monitor and the Washington Post, the Atlantic Monthly and Harper’s Magazine and had at its core the wild-eyed and bushy-haired theoreticians of Socialist Harvard and the London School of Economics. It was determined to bring the United States into World War II on the side of England (Roosevelt's first love) and Soviet Russia (his second love) in order to destroy every finer element of American life and, as part of this consciously planned scheme, invited Japan to attack Pearl Harbor, and destroyed Chiang Kai-shek, all the while undermining America’s real strength by excessive spending and unbalanced budgets.

So he calls this a fairy tale but then he continues on page 950.

"This myth, like all fables, does in fact have a modicum of truth.

Listen to this.

"There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies notably to its belief that England was an Atlantic rather than a European power and it must allied or even federated with the United States and must remain isolated from Europe but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known."



I generally don't read from books. I prefer that the people who are interested go and get the books themselves and read them if they’re really, really interested but you see this is not a conspiracy per se. It’s an open type of conspiracy as H.G. Wells called it himself. He should know since he was a propagandist for the group.


This is taken right from page 949 of Tragedy & Hope" talking about the United States.

"The radical right version of these events as written up by John T. Flynn, Frieda [Whitley] and others was even more remote from the truth than were the [Bodensee's] or Bentley's versions although it has a tremendous impact on American opinion and American relations with other countries in the years 1947 to 1955.

This radical Right fairy tale, which is now an accepted folk myth in many groups in America, pictured the recent history of the United States, in regard to domestic reform and in foreign affairs, as a well-organized plot by extreme Left-wing elements, operating from the White House itself and controlling all the chief avenues of publicity in the United States, to destroy the American way of life, based on private enterprise, laissez faire, and isolationism, in behalf of alien ideologies of Russian Socialism and British cosmopolitanism (or internationalism). This plot, if we are to believe the myth, worked through such avenues of publicity as The New York Times and the Harold Tribune, the Christian Science Monitor and the Washington Post, the Atlantic Monthly and Harper’s Magazine and had at its core the wild-eyed and bushy-haired theoreticians of Socialist Harvard and the London School of Economics. It was determined to bring the United States into World War II on the side of England (Roosevelt's first love) and Soviet Russia (his second love) in order to destroy every finer element of American life and, as part of this consciously planned scheme, invited Japan to attack Pearl Harbor, and destroyed Chiang Kai-shek, all the while undermining America’s real strength by excessive spending and unbalanced budgets.

So he calls this a fairy tale but then he continues on page 950.

"This myth, like all fables, does in fact have a modicum of truth.

Listen to this.

"There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies notably to its belief that England was an Atlantic rather than a European power and it must allied or even federated with the United States and must remain isolated from Europe but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known."


That's an understatement. This interlocking network that was setup in the late 1800s in England by Lord Rothschild who financially backed it and Cecil Rhodes left his Will to Lord Rothschild and it was to be based upon Jesuit lines of operation. How the Jesuit lines of operation they're talking about is to totally obscure the cracks by having people fight each other and group fight group never knowing that there's one group behind all of it agitating it all, funding it all and keeping the agitations going and directed towards a specific objective, a specific outcome.

Carroll Quigley who was the man who picked or was told to pick Bill Clinton for the Rhode Scholarship was a member of this group. He was a member of the intelligentsia as he saw himself and even publishing this book could have been his downfall because he'd broken out and thought that the public were ready to accept the fact that an intelligentsia was dominating them secretly and he believed the public would probably accept it. Well today he'd have no problem because we are totally dominated and the public can't even see the trails in the sky above their head making the global warming but they do believe the propaganda on television that there is global warming caused by us of course. So if he tried that today he'd have no problem. They would just have yawned and turned the station to wrestling or something.

He goes on to say on page 950: He says:

"At the risk of some repetition, the story will be summarized here because the American branch of this organization (sometimes called the "Eastern Establishment) has played a very significant role in the history of the United States in the last generation. The Round Table Groups were semi-secret discussion and lobbying groups organized by Lionel Curtis, Philip H. Kerr, who is Lord Lothian and Sir William S. Marris in 1908-1911. This was done on behalf of Lord Milner, the dominant Trustee of the Rhodes Trust in the two decades 1905-1925. The original purpose of these groups was to seek to federate the English-speaking world along lines laid down by Cecil Rhodes and William T. Stead and the money for the organizational work came originally from the Rhodes Trust."

He lists every member in every generation since that. Now apart from setting up the Council on Foreign Relations for the United States rather than call it -- it wouldn't go to well if they called it The Royal Institute of the United States. They call it the Council on Foreign Relations. They also setup the IPS for the Pacific Rim regions and this was to get a form of communists uprising in the Far East because the fastest way to bring many different peoples and tribes together is to give them an ideal to fight for and a common enemy and that's what Vietnam was all about. The aliens came in. All of the scattered tribes united. There was only one organized and well funded party. That was the Communist Party. They centralized government. The Americans move out and the centralized government basically takes on the same forms as was called "democratic governments". It's the same standardization process.

This was all made to happen, planned and worked at tirelessly by dedicated intergenerational families trained in the Ivy League schools of the United States and England and they sent them out from Canada too and Australia and New Zealand. Big players all and these guys have been behind the creation of the Soviet system, the system in China, of Vietnam and everywhere else. To unify the world is the objective.

Now the Jesuits were blamed for the same thing for trying to unify their old world order through subterfuge causing events to happen where the people in front the groups would be identified and hated and fight each other but they'd never know that the Jesuits were behind it. It's the same technique used here with the members of these groups who are well trained and they're picked at university and trained for their positions.

We can go as far back even to Lawrence of Arabia who in his own book, "The Seven Pillars of Wisdom" talks about his selection at Cambridge University and his immersion in Aramaic and Arab studies for his significant role that was planned years ahead.

They plan the world always way ahead like a big business plan and they watch everything come to pass. They give us our thoughts. They give us our opinions. The talking heads on television that come on all the experts on pretty well every topic is meant to bend our mind in a particular mode of accepting another loss of rights or whatever are supplied by them. The merging of Europe was their plan and idea. They were behind it all and the merging unification of the Americas was also their idea. The third one of course was the Pacific Rim Region.

Karl Marx was funded by the same crowd. Just before Cecil Rhodes came along they were going then and Karl Marx wrote about the unification of these three continents you might say.

On page 951 he talks about the funding that was setup.

"Money for the widely ramified activities of this organization came originally from the associates and followers of Cecil Rhodes chiefly from the Rhodes Trust itself and from wealthy associates such as the Beit brothers, from Sir Abe Bailey, and (after 1915) from the Astor family. Since 1925 there have been substantial contributions from wealthy individuals and from foundations and firms associated with the international banking fraternity, especially the Carnegie United Kingdom Trust, and other organizations associated with J.P. Moran, the Rockefeller and Whitney families, and the associates of Lazard Brothers and of Morgan Grenfell and Company.

The chief backbone of this organization grew up along the already existing financial cooperation running from the Morgan Bank in New York to a group of international financiers in London led by Lazard Brothers. Milner himself in 1901 had refused a fabulous offer worth up to 100,000 a year to become one of the three partners of the Morgan Bank in London in succession to the younger J.P. Morgan who moved from London to join is father in New York. Eventually the vacancy went to E.C. Grenfell, so that the London affiliate of Morgan became known as Morgan Grenfell and Company.

Instead Milner became director of a number of public banks chiefly, the London Joint Stock Bank, corporate precursor of the Midland Bank. He became one of the greatest political and financial powers in England with his disciples strategically placed throughout England and significant places such as the editorship of The Times, the editorship of The Observe", the managing directorship of Lazard Brothers, various administrative posts, and even Cabinet positions."

That's parliament positions.

"Ramifications were established in politics, high finance, Oxford and London universities periodicals, the civil service and tax exempt foundations."

Jumping back we can see the trail of this group long before Cecil Rhodes to one of its members who takes the credit for starting it up which is nonsense. He was only one man that popped his head up in time in history and acted in one main country and that was Adam Weishaupt. Now Adam Weishaupt who’s well know for the illuminati and the bustle of the word "illuminati", but really it was a member of the same group preexisting Cecil Rhodes.

These guys don't start and stop. It's a continuous line down through history and Weishaupt said that they would create foundations, great foundations of wealth which would be untouchable by the public because they would appear as charitable foundations but the amount of wealth they would accumulate would be phenomenal and with it they would basically fund the front groups, the NGOs as we call them today, Non-Governmental Organizations who would then press for public demands on parliaments and presidents and Congresses and that's how they would change the laws to have a standardization process across the planet. We find that the banking establishment and those who become CEOs of banks who just move from bank to bank and in politics out of politics are big players in this.

Quigley says in his book on page 952:

"The New York branch was dominated by the associates of the Morgan Bank. For example, in 1928 the Council on Foreign Relations had John W. Davis as president, Paul Cravath as vice-president, and a council of thirteen others, which included Owen D. Young, Russell C. Leffingwell, Norman Davis, Allen Dulles, George W. Wickersham, Frank L. Polk, Whitney Shepardson, Isaiah Bowman, Stephen P. Duggan, and Otto Kahn.

Throughout its history, the council has been associated with the American Round Tables, such as Beer, Lippmann, Shepardson, and Jerome Greene. The academic figures have been those linked to Morgan, such as James T. Shotwell, Charles Seymour, Joseph P. Chamberlain, Philip Jessup, Isaiah Bowman and, more recently, Philip Moseley, Grayson L. Kirk, and Henry W. Wriston. The Wall Street contracts with these were created originally from Morgan's influence in handling large academic endowments."

That's university endowments.

"In the case of the largest of these endowments, that at Harvard, the influence was usually exercised indirectly through "State Street", Boston, which, for much of the twentieth century, came through the Boston banker Thomas Nelson Perkins. Closely allied with this Morgan influence were a small group of Wall Street law firms, whose chief figures were Elihu Root, John W. Davis, Paul D. Cravath, Russell Leffingwell, the Dulles brothers and, more recently, Arthur H. Dean, Philip D. Reed, and John J. McCloy. Other nonlegal agents of Morgan included men like Owen D. Young and Norman H. Davis.

On this basis, which was originally financial and goes back to George Peabody, there grew up in the twentieth century a power structure between London and New York which penetrated deeply into university life, the press, and the practice of foreign policy. In England the center was a Round Table Group, while in the United States it was J.P. Morgan and Company or its local branches in Boston, Philadelphia, and Cleveland. Some rather incidental examples of the operations of this structure are very revealing, just because they are incidental. For example, it set up in Princeton a reasonable copy of the Round Table Group's chief Oxford headquarters, All Souls College.

This copy, called the Institute for Advanced Study, and best known, perhaps, as the refuge of Einstein, Oppenheimer, John von Neumann, and George F. Kennan, was organized by Abraham Flexner of the Carnegie Foundation and Rockefeller's General Education Board after he had experienced the delights of All Souls while serving as Rhodes Memorial Lecturer at Oxford. The plans were largely drawn by Tom Jones, one of the Round Table's most active intriguers and foundation administrators.

The American branch of this "English Establishment" exerted much of its influence through five American newspapers (The New York Times, New York Herald Tribune, Christian Science Monitor, the Washington Post, and the lamented Boston Evening Transcript ).

In fact, the editor of the Christian Science Monitor was the chief American correspondent of The Round Table, and Lord Lothian, the original editor of The Round Table and later secretary of the Rhodes Trust and ambassador to Washington, was a frequent writer in the Monitor. It might be mentioned that the existence of this Wall Street Anglo-American axis is quite obvious once it is pointed out. It is reflected in the fact that such Wall Street luminaries such as John W. Davis, Lewis Douglas, Jock Whitney, and Douglas Dillon were appointed to be American ambassadors in London."

So there's your financial groups tied together this networking of finance which funds which is quite easy to do if own all the money you fund what you want into existence. You promote and payoff people to open doors for the ones you want to get through to the top with your agenda and this group is still pushing ahead as ever today intergenerational.

On the Canadian television 2005 the Council on Foreign Relations officially for the first time as a group came on the national television at news time CBC and said that they were behind the plans for the Unification of the Americas and they drafted up the plans for the politicians. Money, higher power positions, media, politics it's all owned by them. The world government.

Up until about this point, Quigley's talking about primarily the English/American connection and later on in the book he goes into the Pacific Region connection that would eventually unite the Pacific countries and put Australia in with them.

On page 953 he goes into how it branched out in the early days to include Europe as well. He says this:

"This double international networking which the Round Table groups formed the semi-secret or secret nuclei of the Institutes of International Affairs was extended into a third network in 1925, organized by the same people for the same motives. Once again the mastermind was Lionel Curtis, and the earlier Round Table Groups and Institutes of International Affairs were used as nuclei for the new network.

However, this new organization for Pacific affairs was extended to ten countries, while the Round Table Groups existed in only seven. The new additions, ultimately China, Japan, France, the Netherlands, and Soviet Russia, had Pacific councils set up from scratch. In Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, Pacific councils, interlocked and dominated by the Institutes of International Affairs, were set up.

In England, Chatham House served as the English center for both nets, while in the United States the two were parallel creations (not subordinate) of the Wall Street allies of the Morgan Bank. The financing came from the same international banking groups and their subsidiary commercial and industrial firms. In England, Chatham House was financed for both networks by the contributions of Sir Abe Bailey, the Astor family"

You've heard of Ann Bailey, those who were into theosophy.

"…the Astor family and additional funds largely acquired by the persuasive powers of Lionel Curtis. The financial difficulties of the IPR Councils in the British Dominions in the depression of 1929-1935 resulted in a very revealing effort to save money, when the local Institute of International Affairs absorbed the local Pacific Council, both of which were, in a way, expensive and needless fronts for the local Round Table groups. The chief aims of this elaborate, semi-secret organization were largely commendable:"

Now this is a man who was all for it, an elitist himself.

"…to coordinate the international activities and outlooks of all the English-speaking world into one (which would largely, it is true, be that of the London group); to work to maintain the peace; to help backward, colonial, and underdeveloped areas to advance toward stability, law and order, and prosperity along lines somewhat similar to those taught at Oxford and the University of London (especially the School of Economics and the Schools of African and Oriental Studies)."

So we're looking at a tremendously powerful, powerful group who push democracy as though it were something that the people had created themselves, while they themselves are anything but democratic. THEY DO EVERYTHING IN THE DARK, IN SECRET.

They don't believe in democracy themselves but they want us to believe in it. We must believe the myth you see to allow them to accomplish the goals. There's no slave like a slave that thinks he's free and these are all very wealthy people; very wealthy bankers and noble families deciding all this for us.

They believe that they are the top of the Darwinian heap while we're just the junk DNA. They've been behind all of the wars. All of the ongoing wars too because they must standardize the whole world under their one system and all of this stuff with global warming, that's another big fear racket they're financing on funding all of that to make us change our way of living, to get us into habitat areas where we will live like "fleas in a thimble" all jumping over each other while they will have reforested the wilds for themselves -- for their own offspring to helicopter into for the weekend parties.

This is the Brave New World, a controlled society. Totally controlled society and eventually you won't be able to even leave the area you're assigned to. That's already on the way in fact with the bills that are on the table in most countries to do with ID cards and radius of travel within. The same as the Soviet system because the Soviet system was "the test bed" for all that is happening today. The Soviet was not an independent rebellious unit. It was a creation of people in London, England who already owned what we call "The Capitalist System".

During World War II, Chatham House their headquarters in England was turned into the official Secret Service office for the country which tells you it's not just an independent powerful organization, it's got the blessings. It works for the top of the Crown of London. For those who wonder about the impact of this group and the major events worldwide in the last hundred years they should read "Tragedy & Hope" themselves.

You'll find every major politician in every country including the top bureaucrats, professors and newspaper editors are members of other branch of The Royal Institute of International Affairs for Commonwealth countries or a member of the Council on Foreign Relations for non-commonwealth countries. There's hardly an exception and you'll find too another branch of it is the Trilateral Commission which is dedicated to the three main trading blocks of the world which will come into being around (officially that is) around 2010-2012 under a single world government.




These guys have their fingers in every pie. They have their men behind the spokesmen at the United Nations. They give the funding to the United Nations. The United Nations is just a front organization really for this particular elitist group who use Plato's Republic as a manual almost, a training manual.

Now remember Plato who was an aristocrat himself and who called the common people "ITS" said "that they could breed the "ITS" for special tasks through selective breeding just like animals" and we wonder why the mad rush is on today not to cure diseases but to create new types of humans is all coincidence okay, yeah.

The secret society under all of its names has been here for thousands of years. Thousands of years and even many of those who participate in the Secret Organization don't know their own history. They don't have to mind you. In fact, they don't need to know much at all for the particular role that they have to fulfill.

We should also never forget that Cecil Rhodes himself and many others belong to the group set out across the planet to take over the natural resources and all wealth of the planet into their own corporations and foundations and Rhodes himself cornered the gold and diamond business from Africa in partnership with DeBeers. We see this today with the great corporations international such as Halliburton. It's like a pyramid of many companies who are just given the contracts worldwide - the major contracts especially by the United States.

We fall back to Albert Pike of Freemasonry. We talked about the creation of these foundations and the necessity to use every means possible including manipulation of the stock market to rise to success and acquire the wealth to "become the masters over the masters of the world."

And it's so funny on the media -- people look to the media even though they could read this for themselves and study it and trace all -- even the people you see today on the media their favorite talking heads and find out they're members of these organizations. They can do that and yet they're so trained they'll still listen to new information and then go back to the media to see if the media will verify that for them. Isn't that odd? Because they're trained that if it's on TV it must be true. If it's not on television it can't be worth knowing and that's now well they've been indoctrinated.

They have accepted that the media is there to do their thinking and reasoning for them as though it's an official part of government. It's natural like gravity. It’s just there. They've forgotten that the media is in private hands, private hands. Now parents and grandparents can probably remember the machinations of the big editors and their ties to the bigger banking business and the fact that big editors tend to go over to get knighted by the Crown in England. So many of the U.S. big shakers and movers towards this global agenda have been over to be knighted by the Queen. Why? Why is that so important especially when it's against the U.S. Constitution that American citizens get knighted by foreign monarchies and yet they all go over and do it the big players.

It's amazing to watch this happen and they can't put two and two together because the media won't come out and tell them this. They want to explain to them in simple child-like fashion how the world is really run. Their job is to keep you living in the same land as the Wizard of Oz in a state of perpetual infantilism where there's a Big Brother or a Big Daddy taking care of everything for you and making all your decisions for you and telling you when you should be worried and with what you should be worried. Oh my goodness it's global warming now. We’ll have to change all our way of living. You all have to move into these little habitat areas and live on top of each other and you'll have to have your lives organized for you because well you just can't do it yourself. You're too stupid.

That really is what you're being told and it's true. The people have become so lobotomized and I mean that in its fullest sense. I think they have been lobotomized. I think we've all suffered the effects from the inoculations. Again, all these inoculations began as philanthropic enterprises. That should be suspicious to begin with and the fact that they have also published books by big players on the ways to lobotomize the public to make them more pliable and compliant.

The effects of autism have skyrocketed and the only graph that matches it is the inoculation programs that go along side of it. They're both the same graphs but because the media won't come out and tell you what is obvious we dismiss it. Look at the blanket over discussion of the aerial spraying we're being bombarded with since the '90s to the present time and the effects it's having on people with bronchitis and who knows what else.

Look at the writings of Brzezinski another big player and look at the organizations he belonged to. I've just been talking about them and Brzezinski said in his own book "that shortly a technology would be used on the general public which would influence their behavior," and he was talking about in "The Technetronic Era" as it was called where they could literally use HAARP type technology to manipulate the emotions and the thoughts of everyone. You see the effects all around you. It's being used.

You'll find that people like Brzezinski don't say these things without meaning it. They mean what they say and they do it. It's the public who make the excuses and say, "well they can't mean that. They can't really mean that." Just like when the Department of Population Control at the United Nations gives out the statistics and rattles the warning bells of course, oh my God it's just overflowing with people and they're popping out all over every second of the day. They've got to do something. Well they are doing things about it. They just don't want to terrify you that much in case you overreact and go at them when you find out they're behind it.

THEY ARE DEPOPULATING THE PLANET.

For Africa it was decided it would be the faster kill. For Europe and the West it would be the slow, degenerative type diseases which would make partners ineligible for marriage or for child bearing. And so we have chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia. We have all the Epstein-Bar viruses. There's a whole bunch of things out there. Terms for really all the same thing. They just came out of nowhere at the same time. And then we run for all the quack cures that's offered to us because sickness is a very real thing and unfortunately there are lots of people who will take advantage of every misfortune an individual has. There's a lot of profit to be made off of misery.

It is of note that this organization also branches out into the sciences, all scientific areas and opens the doors for their own favored people to get to the top of these scientific organizations. They sent the trend in psychology. They sent the trend in psychiatry. They sent the trend in medicine. They sent the trend in every area of science. Very powerful. Everything that means anything in control in the society goes back to the same group and they train members -- they bring in members in the Rhodes Scholarships as one of the scholarships. They own many in this day and age, but they bring them in from all countries, all countries in Europe. We have Rhode Scholars working in our governments. All who have taken oaths towards world citizenship and you'll hear Rockefeller often give out awards at their little semi-private meetings for World Citizenship. Pierre Trudeau of Canada called himself a "World Citizen."

Back to Weishaupt. Weishaupt was the first one who put that term into writing that he would create a World Citizenship Society. The reason being as I say it's all the one organization down through time with many names and some say and it's very true, it could be very true anyway at least going all the way back to Babylon where it was very difficult to simply define what Babylon was. It was an entire structural system and it was merchandising. It was money banking, international commerce, taxation, government all of the things we know today. It was an entire structural system and education of course is always in there is a biggie because you must control the minds of the young and shape their outcomes for them.

They say that Isis was the goddess of a thousand faces. It's a thousand names, a thousand faces and it's no different today. All pervasive. Run on a Jesuit type fashion and always try to have front groups which take the heat and divert and distort the cause. They hide the cause and distort it while the real boys continue unimpeded and never ever are responsible to the public.

Now Carroll Quigley also wrote "The Anglo-American Establishment" a fantastic history going into some even greater detail in parts of this. The embryo idea of the unification of countries. The Unification of Europe. The Anglo-European or British "Atlantic Charter" which cemented the United States policies with that of England and the Far Eastern policies and the Middle Eastern policies for the future which we're living through right now and this book was also written around the '60s and he was into the early history of it.

Now before the United Nations the same group had setup the League of Nations. They were behind it and this is from page 282 of "The Anglo-American Establishment".

"From this point onward, the Milner group increasingly emphasized the necessity for building up the oceanic block."

He's talking really about the "Atlantic Charter". That was the foundation of the basis for the Charter for the United Nations.

"…In England the basic propaganda work was done through the Round Table and Lionel Curtis while in the U.S. it was done through the Rhode Scholarship organization especially through Clarence Streit and Frank Aydelotte. In England Curtis wrote a series of books and articles advocating a new federal organization built around English-speaking countries. The chief work of this nature was his "Civitas Dei" which appeared in three volumes 1934-37. A one volume addition was issued in 1938 with the title "The Commonwealth of God." The first two volumes of his work are nothing more than the rehash and expansion of the older work "The Commonwealth of Nations," 1916. "By a superficial and frequently erroneous rewriting of world history…"

Now that's very important because H.G. Wells was doing the same thing with other authors at the same time.

"…By a superficial and frequently erroneous rewriting of world history the authors sought to review the evolution of the Commonwealth idea and to show that all of history leads to its fulfillment and achievement in federation. Ultimately this federation will be worldwide but on route it must pass through stages of which the chief federation is of the English-speaking peoples. Writing early in 1937 he advocated that the League of Nations be destroyed by the mass resignation of the British democracies. These should then take the initiative in forming a new league…"

That's the United Nations.

"…also at Geneva which would have no power to enforce anything but would merely form a kind of international conference since it would be foolish to expect any federation to evolve from any such organization as this. A parallel but quite separate effort should be made to create an international commonwealth based on the example of the United States in 1788."

Now if you could jump back in time you can remember that Thomas Jefferson's own writings, not about him but by him in his letters he said that the United States of America he hoped would be a basis for not just a federation of the United States but a United States of the World. It's all connected.

"…This international commonwealth would differ from the League of Nations in that its members would yield a part of their sovereignty and a central organization would function directly on individuals and not merely on states."

In other words, they'd have the power to go right to the individual for any type of taxation and law et cetera.

"This international commonwealth would be formed at first only of those states that have evolved furthest in the direction of obtaining a Commonwealth form of government for themselves, democracy. It will be recalled that this restriction of membership was what Curtis had advocated for the League of Nations in the Round Table of December 1918. According to Curtis, the movement towards the Commonwealth of God can be begin by the union of any two national Commonwealths no matter how small. He suggested New Zealand and Australia or at least two in Great Britain then international Commonwealth could be expanded to include India, Egypt, Holland, Belgium…"

Belgium is very important because they knew then that that's where they would setup the European Parliament.

"…Scandinavia, France, Canada, United States and Ireland but the chief obstacle to this union was to be found in men's minds was perfectly clear to Curtis. To overcome this obstacle he put his faith in the propaganda and the chief instruments of that propaganda he said "must be the churches and the universities."

Very important part. Very important because you train the minds of the young, the movers and shakers at the universities. The ones who go into bureaucracies and government.

"…He said nothing about the Milner group but considering Curtis' position at the group that Lothian (that's Lord Lothian) and others agreed him that it's not surprising the chief source of his propaganda is to be found in those agencies controlled by the group."

Well this group controls almost all the big agencies worldwide and all the foundations worldwide. They have enormous sums of wealth at their disposal to push NGOs. To push policies. To have the NGOs come up and demand from government certain things be done on behalf of the public and that was the Soviet system and as I say the Soviet system was nothing more than "the big test bed", the laboratory for the whole planet and the Soviet system was designed in London, England a long time ago.

Money runs everything in this world. Every president, every Prime Minister on the planet knows his country can be sunk at any time by those who hold the deck and those who give credit and yet we think we're free and we think we’re democratic. We never even meet or most people don't even know the names of those in the World Bank, the world bankers. Most people don't even know what money is. They don't think past the fact they can spend it.

But we're living in a totally controlled scientifically designed propagandized system where fashion as Plato said "music, drama and all propaganda of politics is designed by a few at the top and promoted downwards to the people." That's called "culture creation."

So I hope those that want to do their own research will get these two books. I'm not promoting anybody selling them. You can do your own search to find them and I could go into even greater detail because I have member's copies of their meetings of different years where they discuss the future of the planet. Some of these books going back to the 1930s discussing the coming war with Germany. Discussing a possible attack by Japan on the United States and fortunate it would be to get the United States into a war and a post-war world and also the saving of the Soviet system.

Why was it so important?

Because they were behind the creation and the funding in the setting up of the Soviet system. The fastest way to amalgamate many different peoples, get them off the land into the cities (the urban populations they created) industrialize them and put in the one standardized system, a centralized government.

Nothing major happens in history outside of nature and even nature is controlled today. But nothing happens without it being planned that way. Meanwhile, the paid press stirs everyone up and gives them the fever of election time (their own terminology). Easy to do. They've conditioned the public to suddenly go bananas when they see the clowns and the banners and the balloons like a circus and the public think there's hope there. There's hope because someone surely will do the right thing one day.


Their life experience tells them it never happens in politics but that doesn’t stop them from getting the fever and trying again. We're on a course of the utter most tyranny in a scientifically designed system which will eventually obliterate anyone's ability to even think of themselves as a distinct separate individual.

And those who still have a functioning brain and who haven't been too loaded down with inoculations from birth will find that they're in a generation, the only last generation with a chance of doing anything about this and we have to speak out now and you have to arm yourself with the ammunition of books such as the ones I have just mentioned and demand the answers.

But most importantly, you must demand to know the organizations and affiliations and the oaths taken by everyone who has any jurisdiction over your life from a school board to your local police officer to the judges to the law courts to the governments. It's only then you will see this fraternity, this network across the planet is all pervasive and it's then you must demand to get them out and don't give your power away to others to rule over you until you've thoroughly, thoroughly vetted them. Someone who wants the power to rule over you cannot keep anything secret from the public.





Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – November 9, 2006 (Exempting Music and Literary Quotes)


WWW.CUTTINGTHROUGHTHEMATRIX.COM

Thursday, May 8, 2008

ROLL UP, ROLL UP! TUNE IN TO THE BODY PART GAME-SHOW MACABRE""CHEMICAL EVOLUTION TO "PERFECT" WOMEN

Years ago, there was a movie put out called "Running Man," a futuristic movie with predictive programming, as they all do, in fact, getting us used to an idea where sports would evolve into blood-sports. "Rollerball" was another one along the same vein, the first "Rollerball," where a world corporation ran the world. You had three groups of people: Those who were in the corporation at the top; the lesser bureaucrats, who dealt with the public and gave them their entertainment; and then, the people at the bottom, who simply lived for blood-sports, like the Gladiators did; and the crowds went to see them in ancient Rome.

In other words, because culture and reality are mandated from the top, any changes are authorized from the top down; then, any culture can become the normal if it's introduced in the right way. And more importantly, it's better to make sure the public have their indoctrination, gradually, towards the idea of acceptance of it, so that when it's brought on the scene, it becomes normal to them, quite easily.

Culture is plastic; it's fluid, almost. It's not static. The culture that's given, from the top, must fit the times you live in. It's tailor-made for the times that you live in. Long before the public even got hold of a computer for their home, there were articles in the newspapers talking about this new revolution. Revolution—a very important word, since those behind it are very old with their societies. They love revolution. Most revolutions are not bloody—they're cultural.

They spoke and said that this revolution would change the world, how everyone would have to adapt to it. It was a mandate, in other words. They also talked about information wars, before the public were given the computer; so for those people who think they're on the cutting edge, there's nothing that you're given that's there to help you. They would never give you what would be regarded as a weapon, when they have already declared this a cultural war, an information war. They're very serious when they use these terms, like “the war on poverty,” “the war on drugs,” “the war on seatbelts,” et cetera. They mean it. Therefore, when they gave you the Internet, they already had it planned that they would dominate it; and they do. The biggest sites out there that fascinate you (no doubt, with sex or Atlantis stories, et cetera) are dominated by those who are making war on your mind and the culture, as they upgrade the culture.

When you want to do horrible things to humanity, you must have a dehumanized humanity. The process of dehumanization can be brought on insidiously or fairly quickly, depending on how much time and effort they put in to creating the new reality.

It might surprise people that before the 1920’s, sports teams were just local teams that played games for free. They were little clubs, little hobby clubs. The big writers came out and said how they would make sports national pastimes (addictions, really) and arenas. Arena, remember, comes from ancient Rome. Arena is AARON, because there's much more behind the old terms you're given, than face value would allow.

Societies which are to be vastly changed and dominated by ruthless people, must therefore give a culture which is dehumanized and pretty well dysfunctional, in a sense. Everyone must be divided, separated from everyone else. Man from woman, parents from children and generation from generation. Very carefully done through specialized scientific indoctrination, followed by massive propaganda, daily, on all media.

Once the people are dehumanized, you can do anything with them. You can bring anything in, no matter how horrific it would have sounded in a previous time, it will be accepted by the public. Once the public accepts dehumanization and join in the gruesome fest that's dished up to them, with fascination, then true horror will breakout within society and no one will care; it's now normal.

In Monty Python's "The Meaning of Life," it starts off with a spoof, after the hospital drama, where men visit the homes asking for kidneys and livers from donors, as a routine thing. We have seen, as the people have started to believe the science, they’ve replaced old religions with sciences. The sciences are taught as religions. They're authoritarian. They, like all religions, will accept no opposition to their theories, which are taught as facts. They want total power over everyone, with the excuse that their religion, this science, is therefore logic. It’s no different from previous times, when great churches would come out with their theories and give you formats of how to live. It’s the same process. Anyone who opposed that was condemned, because all those who become gods, in this old world, will tolerate no other gods before them. Nothing really changes, just the garments they wear.

We've all been subjected to documentaries, over the years, on countries like the Philippines, where wealthy people from across the world can order kidneys, for instance, when they need a transplant, from healthy people. How the big surgeons, mainly from the U.S., go over, pay the donor a paltry sum, take the kidney and sell it and replace it to the recipient (the one with the big money). It’s a going business. Then you see the one who was the donor in the first place, who spends the little bit they've got, and people who are living in abject poverty, you see them having to spend the little bit they've got on medical treatment, because of all the side-effects and infections that set in and so on.

This, also, even the showing of this, is a dehumanizing process, because we're left with no answer. There is no debate about it. Is it right? wrong? Laws are never passed to stop it, the exploitation of the poor. However, what does come to pass is that the public, after various shows, programs and documentaries on the subject, begin to accept it. What they're actually accepting is their own dehumanization.

Compassion is neutralized, when you see injustice carried out, you expect justice and it doesn't happen. The people become bitter, hardened or simply discompassionate; and lots of these programs, collectively, help to dehumanize us. You'll hear ordinary people who live and get every idea from television, by watching documentaries, parrot verbatim what the Big Boys say, "There's too many people on the planet. We're just another animal. We can't go on like this, et cetera, et cetera." It would never dawn on them to do their own research on anything that's given to them. They're accepting dehumanization, and agreeing with the Big Boys, “there's just too many people.” However, I wonder if the Big Boys will ever volunteer, first, to euthanize themselves so that others may live; and that's the day where pigs might fly.

Another way to help this dehumanizing process, to get us to accept it, is to do what they've done on comedy and movies, long ago; and that's to present it in a show fashion, a game show fashion, just like "The Running Man."

In the "Daily Mail," from England, and this is from the 30th of May 2007; (may be the 31st of May 2007), is an article, which is probably happening in other countries. It's just that you don't hear about other countries with similar articles. We think we're always isolated, but you'll find that, generally, things are happening across the world at the same time, in all countries, somewhere.

This article by Allan Hall says this:

"Patients waiting for transplant organs have condemned a Dutch TV reality show, in which a dying woman will choose a patient to receive one of her kidneys. The National Kidney Federation spoke out as broadcaster BNN vowed to go ahead with the controversial live show this Friday, despite efforts by Dutch MPs to ban it. Behind the scenes, the board of the private TV company was under massive pressure to drop the show, which MPs said was damaging Holland's international reputation."

It goes on to say:

"Today as plans are unveiled in Brussels to improve the organ-donor network across Europe, TV producers from Endemol, the company behind the Big Brother reality shows, are putting the finishing touches to The Big Donor Show. Ray Mackey, 43, co-chairman of the UK National Kidney Federation, who received a kidney transplant two years ago, said the concept of the show was "totally abhorrent". "It just seems that it is totally the shock factor that they are going for," he said.
Three contestants between 18 and 40, armed with professionally made movies about their lives, loves and aspirations, will compete to win the approval of a 37-year-old woman with an inoperable brain tumour, who has been told she will die before the end of the year.
With the help of viewer votes, the woman, known only as Lisa, will decide which contestant deserves her kidney. Mr. Mackey said Endemol had not taken into account the huge psychological blow the two losers would have to deal with. "To go through that traumatic thing on the television, it just doesn't bear thinking about," he added.
Timothy Statham, the federation's chief executive, said the show was a travesty that threatened the organ transplants system, which depended on acts of altruism. Professor John Feehally, who has just ended his term as president of Britain's Renal Association, said: "The scenario portrayed in this programme is ethically totally unacceptable. "The show will not further understanding of transplants. "Instead it will cause confusion and anxiety."
BNN TV, which is based at Hilversum near Amsterdam, appears to be basking in the worldwide publicity. It claims it is provoking debate on an important issue, and says the programme is partly "in tribute" to the station's founder, who died of kidney failure. "We know that this programme is super controversial and some people will think it's tasteless, but we think the reality is even more shocking and tasteless: waiting for an organ is just like playing the lottery," Laurens Drillich, chairman of the BNN network, said. With the massive publicity generated, the Big Donor Show could become one of the most watched TV programmes ever.
The show is planned as a one-off, but Dutch TV industry sources speculated that if viewing figures made it a success, there would be little to stop it acting as a pilot for a series of similar "give me a transplant" type shows. The identities of the donor and would-be recipients are to be revealed when the 80-minute show starts at 8.30pm on Friday. Viewers will be urged to text in their votes, and Lisa will consider their verdict before making the decision on her own about who gets her organs.
BNN has the potential to make hundreds of thousands of pounds in profits on the text messages alone. The broadcaster has brought entertainment to new lows in Holland, with another of its programmes showing drug taking, live sex acts and women testing sex toys. Joop Atsma, an MP with the ruling CDA party, met education minister Ronald Plasterk in an attempt to have the show stopped. "I want to block this. This is truly not permissible," Mr Atsma said. "It would be a victory for decency and common sense if this were not screened." But Mr Plasterk told the Dutch parliament that the constitution forbade him from declaring an outright ban on the show. A spokesman for Endemol in Britain said that, although there was no legal bar to presenting such a programme here, the company had no plans to do so."

It’s quite something, the world we live in, you know, because even "The Daily Mail," with all of its tabloid nonsense. Just look at the ads on the sides of the page, with its usual Hollywood drama stuff and who's doing what to whom, and then all the sex stuff. You see, people are already dehumanized from any standard they had in the past. This is now normal, so it's very hard to criticize something which is already portraying us as base animals. It can't really be done. It's fantasia. It's a circus. This is where the dehumanization process, inter-generationally, will take you—to a horror show. It has no option but to take you to a horror show.

From the mind of the psychopath at the top, what's happening at the bottom seems perfectly logical, because they can't identify with normal human emotions of those other people down below. They are pragmatic. They want efficiency in this world. They have told us of the world they want to bring in. They have been telling us for a long, long, long time in books they've published themselves and written themselves, which we sort of pass over, like clouds passing over our heads, as though it didn't affect us somehow, when we're the subjects of their books, the future. We are the subject of their books. We have been trained not to participate in the creation of our own reality and our destiny. We've been trained to leave it to our “betters.” That's why it's so easily managed, in this day and age, by a few at the top.

The think tanks that come up with the ideas, they shape the future; they plan the future and pass it down to the lower think tanks in the pyramid structure. At one time, life was looked upon as being sacred. That was very important, because without that concept, anything could be done to humanity; and that is the brink we're on today. We’re going over the brink into inhumanity.

The dialectical technique is clever to make things happen within society. For instance, how, if you want to reduce, basically, pregnancy, how would you bring in easily available abortions? It would never occur to people that you create promiscuity, massive promiscuity, because once the promiscuity comes in, the bonding process stops. That's what happens, you see, when you mate with someone, you're actually beginning the forms of a bonding, by nature, so that you can both raise children. When that's been destroyed, then the bonding is blunted. Relationships are short-lived and sex itself, intercourse becomes a simple method of alleviating a drive, temporarily; like quenching your thirst, if you're thirsty, with water.

The aftermath of all the promiscuity is massive pregnancies, all over, by young single girls. Along comes the guy or the people with the solutions, just waiting, biding their time, all prewritten, and government stamps approval, and on you go. Now we sell parts of babies, which are aborted. You can get up to $5,000 for a good spinal column in good condition. It's quite sad, this butchery that's going on in the name of progress. Who defines progress? We should think about that. Whose progress is it and for what purpose? Because there is always purpose.

Now, with the donors, of course, that was another part to get you dehumanized, always with a tragic face—someone who needs help. In comes the solution, we can all become donors. Now it's a Lotto, it's a raffle with cheers and boos and hisses of the crowd in the big arena, as they start festing on this macabre show. One, I'm sure, of many to come. In one way or another, it all fits into the depopulation program, as we allow ourselves to be further dehumanized. “We’re just animals,” you see, we’re animals without rights. The animals got their rights in the Earth Charter, drawn up by the Rockefellers and pushed out by Maurice Strong. We didn't get those rights.

Years ago, people said that many people would love socialism, the definition of it being, "a world run by experts, where you wouldn't have to think and decide anything for yourself." All the major problems and headaches of the world will be taken care of by your betters, and you'd be happy with it, in that way then you could play. You could just spend your life playing.

For many, many years, even in radio talk shows across all countries, the regular AM or FM talk shows, the format has been to give you something controversial, for a topic for the day, to get everyone arguing. Then they go into the Hegelian dialectic, because people immediately take sides—this or that, and the host stirs it up. That's called "good talk radio." They can count on the public doing just that, “what side did you want to jump in on?” They already give you your answers for each side, the dialectical process. However, each topic is actually guiding you towards an acceptance of more and more of the bizarro.

When you have an ignorant population who will not research for themselves, who go beyond conspiracies, a title the elite want you to use on yourself as you search. Go beyond the conspiracies. After all, if you quote the elites’ books, themselves, those who are in power and those who have been in power, their predecessors, it's hardly a conspiracy when they publish it in the open. H.G. Wells called it "The Open Conspiracy." It's there if the public want to read it; it's just not terribly exciting. It's dry reading, no sex or violence, just agenda.

Women were targeted long ago (and men) for the changes to depopulate the planet. Charles Galton Darwin, in "The Next Million Years," talked about methods of introducing hormonal changes within the male and the female to make it so. We see it happening with the lowered sperm count in the male. We see all of the reactions within the female populations. Many of them have become masculinized; and here's a further thrust to it all.

In the BBC news, this is from Wednesday, 23rd of May 2007, it says this:

"US Approves pill to stop periods.

The first birth control pill designed to stop monthly periods has been approved for use in the US. The Food and Drug Administration backed continuous use of the pill, Lybrel…"

It's an interesting name. It's a play on Libra, you see. It certainly will put them out of balance. It's also a play on life or freedom; and "EL" of course is the old, old God.

"…Lybrel which is manufactured by Wyeth."

Interesting name too, Wyeth.

"Taken daily it can halt a woman's menstrual periods indefinitely, as well as prevent pregnancies. Standard contraceptive pills are designed to be taken for three weeks, followed by a week break to allow for menstruation. An FDA official warned Lybrel was not suitable for everyone. About half the women who tested it in trials dropped out before the end, citing irregular and unscheduled bleeding. The pill contains a low dose of two hormones already widely used in birth control pills, ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel. The continuous delivery of the hormones prevents the stimulation of a menstrual cycle."

It then goes on to:

"Bleeding

"A study showed Lybrel was just as effective in preventing pregnancy as a traditional pill called Alesse, also made by Wyeth. But it may be difficult for the women to recognise if they have become pregnant because Lybrel users will not have regular periods. Dr Vanessa Cullins, of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc, welcomed the FSA decision."


People should look into Planned Parenthood Federation, because old Margaret Sanger, who was a supporter of both Stalin and Hitler, and who was a eugenicist—she believed in the eradication of certain races—was the one who started this up. Most women think it's a champion for them. They have no idea of its real tenets.

"She said it might potentially help women whose monthly periods were blighted by headaches, tender breasts, cramps and nausea. However, Jean Elson, a sociologist at the University of New Hampshire, said: "For women in that situation, I certainly can understand the benefits of taking these kinds of medications, but for most women menstruation is a normal life event - not a medical condition. "Why medicate away a normal life event if we're not sure of the long-term effects?"
That view was echoed by health psychologist Paula Derry in a recent editorial in the British Medical Journal. She said: "A drug (that) chronically over-rides the physiological changes associated with the menstrual cycle (is) creating a hormonal environment that is not found in nature."

They happen to be doing that for a long time.

"Toni Belfield, of the Family Planning Association in the UK, said: "For women who don't want to have a period often, this is a very good option."

It's very predictable, what they're going to say, isn't it?, depending on who they work for. I mean, would you go to him to ask an honest opinion?

Here is the good con, these little slogans. Remember, Lenin said, "We shall win by slogans." Well it wasn't lost on any other side, who also had already been using all these different slogans.


"It is important that contraception provides women with a choice…"

See, they make you think you've got a choice.

"…not just between different methods, but between how those methods are used." Doctors have long allowed women to skip their periods by starting a new pack of conventional pills on day 22 of their cycle, rather than waiting a week to resume the hormones."

So there you are. Just nature isn't simply good enough, as the high Masons say. They've got to perfect that which was left imperfect. Quite interesting.

Here is a report for “the choir,” because it's only the choir that really follows any of this. The general population, as you know, are oblivious and don't care, and don't want to know.

This is from the "Independent Media Center" in Winnipeg (IMC). It's about "North American Union plan headed in Congress in fall," May 24th this was done. The source was "World Net Daily," and it says:

A powerful think tank chaired by former Sen. Sam Nunn and guided by trustees including Richard Armitage, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Harold Brown, William Cohen and Henry Kissinger, is in the final stages of preparing a report to the White House and U.S. Congress on the benefits of integrating the U.S., Mexico and Canada into one political, economic and security bloc. "

It’s the same thing that Karl Marx talked about in the 1800’s, which is no coincidence.

They have the same name as the CSIS boys here, our intelligence services. This particular CSIS, which is probably combined with it, mind you, since all intelligence agencies work for the same group.

"CSIS boasts of playing a large role in the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994 – a treaty that set in motion a political movement many believe resembles the early stages of the European Community on its way to becoming the European Union. "The results of the study will enable policymakers to make sound, strategic, long-range policy decisions about North America, with an emphasis on regional integration," explains Armand B. Peschard-Sverdrup, director of CSIS' Mexico Project. "Specifically, the project will focus on a detailed examination of future scenarios, which are based on current trends…"

They love these terms, “current trends.”

"…and involve six areas of critical importance to the trilateral relationship: labor mobility, energy, the environment, security, competitiveness and border infrastructure and logistics." The data collected for the report is based on seven secret roundtable sessions …"

That's how democratic we all are, you see. Why do people vote, eh?

"…The data collected for the report is based on seven secret roundtable sessions…"

The roundtable sessions are members of the Royal Institute for International Affairs, Canadian Institute for International Affairs, and the Council on Foreign Relations. We should remember that. They run the roundtable sessions.

"…involving between 21 and 45 people and conducted by CSIS. The participants are politicians, business people, labor leaders and academics from all three countries with equal representation. All of this is described in a CSIS report, "North American Future 2025 Project."

And you think it’s all just evolving, and the people alive then will too—if there's anybody still alive.

Now here they go:

"The free flow of people across national borders…"

That was the same wording that Karl Marx used. It's the same wording the Royal Institute of International Affair used when they were doing all this stuff for the European integration, beginning in 1945. Actually, it was on before the Second World War; they discussed it, as Winston Churchill admitted to.

"The free flow of people across national borders will undoubtedly continue throughout the world as well as in North America, as will the social, political and economic challenges that accompany this trend," says the report. "In order to remain competitive in the global economy…"

You see, we all have to compete to the bottom, to whoever is at the lowest common denominator, we have to compete downwards.

"…it is imperative for the twenty-first century North American labor market to possess the flexibility…"

Ha, ha. I love the terms.

"…necessary to meet industrial labor demands on a transitional basis and in a way that responds to market forces." As WND reported last week, the controversial "Secure Borders, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Reform Act of 2007," which would grant millions of illegal aliens the right to stay in the U.S. under certain conditions, contains provisions for the acceleration of the Security and Prosperity Partnership,"

“Prosperity Partnership.” Who is going to prosper? They won't tell you that part.

"…a plan for North American economic and defense integration…"

That’s already been done. It happened after 9/11. They admitted they were already integrated.

"… and with remarkable similarities to the CSIS plan."

What a coincidence. It's all the same plan.

"The bill, as worked out by Senate and White House negotiators, cites the SPP agreement signed by President Bush and his counterparts in Mexico and Canada March 23, 2005 – an agreement that has been criticized as a blueprint for building a European Union-style merger of the three countries of North America. "It is the sense of Congress that the United States and Mexico should accelerate the implementation of the Partnership for Prosperity…"

Ha! People will repeat these things you know in public. You'll hear them talk, Partnership for Prosperity. Slogans, "win it by slogans."

"…to help generate economic growth and improve the standard of living in Mexico, which will lead to reduced migration," the draft legislation states on page 211 on the version time-stamped May 18, 2007 11:58 p.m. Since agreement on the major provisions of the bill was announced late last week, a firestorm of opposition has ignited across the country. Senators and representatives are reporting heavy volumes of phone calls and e-mails expressing outrage with the legislation they believe represents the largest "amnesty" program ever contemplated by the federal government."

See, that's how they get you off onto a sidetrack. The immigration is only one little part of this, and I mean it. It's a little part of all of this. Your whole lifestyle, for everyone, is to be altered. It's a planned society we're talking about here. So don't get sidetracked by the supposed protesters complaining just about immigration.

"Meanwhile, while many continue to express skepticism about a plot to integrate North America along the lines of the European Union, WND reported last week that 14 years ago, one of the world's most celebrated economists and management experts said it was already on the fast track and nothing could stop it."

And that's true. It was planned long before we were born, in fact.

"Peter F. Drucker, in one of his dozens of best-selling books, "Post Capitalist Society," published in 1993, wrote that the European Community, the progenitor of the European Union, "triggered the attempt to create a North American economic community, built around the United States by integrating both Canada and Mexico into a common market."

He wasn't the first one. As I say, Karl Marx did it first, and then many of the books put out by the Royal Institute of International Affairs, both before and after World War II, talked about the same thing.

"So far this attempt is purely economic in its goal…"

Ha, ha, ha.

"…wrote the Presidential Medal of Freedom honoree. "But it can hardly remain so in the long run." Drucker describes in his book the worldwide trends toward globalization that were evident back then – the creation and empowerment of transnational organizations and institutions, international environmental goals regarding carbon dioxide and agreements to fight terrorism, long before 9/11."

It’s because they've always got to have an enemy. We're living the script, and this is only part of the script, the reiteration of the same old script. The bulk of the population, as you know, are oblivious and they don't care, because they're happily socialized. They can be little children, who can produce and consume and play, never knowing, never awakening in their whole life. In fact, they don’t like to be awakened.

You see, it isn't just the elite you have to worry about, the ones at the top, the psychopaths. Those who are aware have also the bulk of the population, who are happily playing themselves and plugging their ears, and, saying to you, "I don't want to hear this."

THE ELITE COULDN'T DO ANYTHING IN THIS WORLD WITHOUT THE COOPERATION OF THE BULK OF THE POPULOUS.

They couldn't pass the laws that take away rights and freedoms, without the acceptance, the acquiescence of the general public. The police couldn't do their “blitzes,” as they call them, (a term they borrowed from World War II), their blitzes on the public. That's what they call them in Canada. They’re sort of make-work projects for police, as they hire more and more of them and put them all on the roads. They stop you and they smell your breath, check your seatbelt and all the rest of it, to harass you, to train you to obey, obey, obey as they become dominant, rather than servant.

The public must acquiesce to all of this. After all, government itself is only idea, and all forms of governments are only ideas. It takes the acceptance of the vast majority of the public to allow totalitarianism, and, ultimately, always horror to follow. We must give power to the beast, in order to be devoured by the beast, in all ages.


Some of the shows I've been on, in the past, have brought up a common response to the fear of the changes. The common response is "what shall we do to save the people?" because we think in terms of a collective, rather than individualistic. That's our training, in fact. We've all been trained, collectively, to think this way.

The answer is: You can't (even if you could) save the people, collectively; or you would be a tyrant yourself, simply imposing what you thought was the right way to bring the world to whatever your ideas concluded (how people should live, behave, et cetera). It's the psychopaths, in all eras, who decide for the people which way they'll go, how society will be. People, individually, in the collective, make decisions every single day of their lives, which affect them and affect others. Being silent affects people. Silence is consent, legally. As long as someone else is getting the boot or the club and not you—that in itself would be the decision you would make.

The choice not to know, the choice to say," I don't want to hear that" is a choice, is a decision. It's far easier to do the wrong things. Everyone knows, through conscience (if they are not a psychopath), what's right and wrong, but it's much easier to do the wrong than the good.

All sentient people can do is to communicate information to those who seek it, who are waking up to sentience, but lack the facts. Others ask, "What comes after this life?" It's tempting to say, "It depends what you do with this one." Everyone expects some kind of reward for doing nothing.

Those who seek truth often give up everything that they have to find it. They risk a lot to find it. They become uncomfortable in the milieu in which they live, because those around them, that seem so familiar and close, seem alienated to them now. Because you realize, when you wake up, that everything they say or do is marketed to them, including their opinions and their topics of conversation. Waking up involves the risk of losing those that you thought were closest to you, because you find you don't belong anymore amongst them; and that's been the same in all ages, in all lands.

When Pandora's box is opened, it doesn’t come with a guarantee of personal success, in any way, shape or form, because if you're after truth, it doesn’t come tailor-made to make you happy. You leave that to those at the top, who created and guide the whole New Age movement. They're the same ones that create the reality for the rest of the people, for the big think tanks; and they're funded by them, too. Yet, even though you go through the phases of waking up and you break through barriers (and yes, you will alter a lot), your mind certainly will expand. And yet you'll find you can take far more of the bad news without buckling under and collapsing, because there's a strength in knowing. Not to know is a weakness.

You can't make people wake up. Technically, they've heard many of the things that you have heard yourself on major newscasts, and they’ve chosen not to dwell on it or think about it. They have actually chosen. They are making choices, all the time, and their choice is often: not to know anymore about it. It's too depressing. You must accept that. Otherwise, you're nagging them; you become an evangelist. Don't expect others to think or to be able to go through those barriers, which you can possibly break through.

For a long, long, long time, in fact, since the so-called "birth of democracy," the public never really had a say in anything. It was a show—a show to stop revolutions occurring. They knew a long time ago that without a show of public input, or choices, in their own destiny, there would be revolutions every few years, so they chose democracy as a sham. As Quigley said in "Tragedy & Hope," those at the top of all parties are picked and vetted and all belong to the same club. They have for over 100 years or more.

The big foundations and think tanks that work with the bankers, which work with the old, old aristocracy of the world, run your lives and plan your lives and plan the future. They have 10, 15, 20, 50, 100 year plans and 200 year plans. Check out the plans of the communist system. Check out the plans of the United Nations and the ones of the integration of the continents. They all have their long-term agendas, like a big business plan, including what kind of culture they will have at the end of it. They know it, because they will make it so.

So for those who are sentient out there, it's a hard struggle, but you can come through it. Your biggest problem is being isolated from others of your own kind.







Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – May 31, 2007 (Exempting Music and Literary Quotes)



WWW.CUTTINGTHROUGHTHEMATRIX.COM



www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu