by: Vladimir Averianov, Pravda
Lots of surprises may be hidden under the Antarctic ice and are waiting to be discovered by humans. The existence of a prehistoric civilization in Antarctica started drawing attention of professional historians after the World War II. The hypothesis can be proved by the medieval maps and research of the Western paleogeologists and glaciologists.
In January 1820 the lieutenant of the Russian Imperial Fleet Mikhail Lazarev (Laza-ruse) discovered a new continent. At the beginning of the 20th century famous Russian Brockhaus and Efron encyclopedic dictionary contained an article, according to which the continent was insufficiently explored and that there were no flora and fauna. Besides, the author mentioned the variety of seaweeds and sea animals that inhabited the Antarctic waters.
About twenty years later the head of the Istanbul National Museum "Halil" Edhem (see An Rub al "Khali" - the Empty Quarter in Yemen) found an old map while revising the library of Byzantine emperors in the old sultans palace. The author of the map depicted the Western coast of Africa, the Southern coast of South America and the Northern coast of Antarctica. "Halil" was astonished. The ice edge of the Queen Maud Land south of 70th parallel was free of ice. The author mapped a mountain chain at this point. The name of the cartographer was well known to Edhem. It was the admiral of Ottoman Empire Fleet "Piri Reis" (See POLO - IRS RUSE), who lived in the first half of the 16th century.
In 1949 the joint British-Swedish expedition conducted a thorough seismic exploration of the southernmost continent through the thick ice. The results coincided with the map of "Reis". However, it was a mystery how the map data were to agree with the level of science of 1513.
"Piri Reis" himself explained on the margins of the map that the map was based on a lot of previous sources, some of which belonged to his contemporaries, while others could be dated with as early as the 4th century B.C. One of the sources, for instance, belonged to Alexander the Great. Thus Admiral "Reis" alone could not be held responsible for the data presented on the map.
Medieval maps show Antarctica without ice cover or partly covered with ice. The accuracy of maps of the 16th century is incredible. In terms of the technical means their data can be compared with those of the end of the 18th century and sometimes with those of the 20th century.
According to the "Reis's map" the coastal edge of the continent is not covered with ice. Oronteus Finius's map that was composed 18 years later shows plateau-glacier around the South Pole within the 80th and sometimes 75th parallels. 200 years later academician Buache also depicted Antarctica without the ice.
In 1949 the admiral Byrd's expedition was drilling the Ross Sea bottom approximately in those places where Finius marked the riverbeds. The cores contained fine-grained rocks, well-mixed deposits, brought into the sea by the rivers, the heads of which are located in the middle latitudes (i.e. not covered with ice).
Scientists of Carnegie Institute of Washington managed to establish precisely that Antarctic rivers that contained these deposits were flowing about 6000 years ago. Only after that, about 4000 B.C. did the ice begin accumulating at the bottom of the sea. This fact was preceded by a long period of warmth.
Coincidence if not conspiracy
As a result, the maps mentioned above depict Antarctica of the period when Egyptian and Sumerian civilizations were born. Most of the (paid) historians disclaim this point of view.
However, there is a hypothesis that between the fifth and the tenth millenniums B.C. a human civilization lived on the planet. It possessed great knowledge in navigation, cartography, astronomy, the (visible) level of which was not lower then of that of the 18th century.
This civilization was rather a predecessor of the ours than a product created by aliens. Its age could be several millenniums. It was probably located on the northern coast of the southernmost continent (Kemp Coast) or the archipelago of large islands (Oceania)* that was Antarctica which had a moderate climate at that time. Later it would occupy the northeast of the African continent. (See the Gypsy Egyptians - Roma)
The civilization could have disappeared because of the icing up of the southern land that began not earlier than in the tenth millennium B.C. Another possible reason could be large inundations that led to long-lasting local floods, which are not disclaimed by archaeologists. Such "natural" disasters could destroy almost the whole material culture of the protocivilization. It can be possible that some part of it is covered with thick Antarctic ice. Another possibility is that some of the representatives of this protocivilization could have survived (See The Roma of Sri Lanka and Madras, India). In this case they could have passed their knowledge (via Yemen) to Egyptians and Sumerians.
Humans cannot but hope that (unrestricted) further archaeological research will solve the mysteries of the southernmost continent. There could be lots of surprises hidden here.Vladimir Averianov, Pravda