Let me warn you, this is a little longer than my usual posts here, but it was prompted by a big op-ed article in the Birmingham News this morning. Take the time to read it, if you dare. Seems like our local paper has settled on one side of the climate change debate, which is certainly their right. But, I have the right to publish this article as well….
Two years ago, it seemed like nothing could stop the global warming train. Most of the media, those in Hollywood, politicians (many on both sides of the cultural divide), and “enlightened environmentalists” were all telling us that man was causing runaway warming of the earth’s atmosphere, meaning global catastrophe only decades ahead for all of us.
Scary stuff.
The problem is that a majority of those in this almost religious movement have little training in atmospheric science, and little understanding of the issue. They jumped on the bandwagon because it matches their worldview, or pads their pocket. This issue has generated great wealth on both sides of the argument, and I need to say up front I have absolutely no financial interest in climate. I am paid the same regardless of whether man is involved in climate change or not, and I have never taken a dime for a speech on the subject.
The simple truth is that the anthropogenic global warming train has slowed to a crawl, and the riders are jumping off as the facts are discovered.
What is the truth? Lets begin with something we all can agree on. The climate IS changing. It has always changed, it is changing now, and it will always change.
Beyond that, here are some simple facts that make those left on the global warming train very uncomfortable:
*The earth is no warmer now than it was in 1998. *Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant, but a gas indispensable to plant life. Plants, in turn, release oxygen, which sustains animal and human life. *The primary greenhouse gas is water vapor, not carbon dioxide. *The lack of solar activity in recent months suggests global cooling might be our biggest potential climate change problem in coming years. *The planet has had weather disasters, extremes, and anomalies since it has been here. We just didn’t have 24 hour news channels and the Internet in prior decades to spread the news.
I have been doing the weather on local television for 30 years, and EVERY YEAR I have had people come up to me and tell me that they can “never remember the weather being this strange”.
Most of those that you see and hear speaking on the subject have little scientific knowledge. Here is a quote from Dr. Roy Spencer, a climatologist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, from an article he penned recently:
“Alarmists like Al Gore will use pseudo-scientific justifications and comparisons in their attempt to make a connection between carbon dioxide and global warming. Even though CO2 is necessary for life on Earth, the alarmists insist on calling it a pollutant, referring to our atmosphere as an “open sewer.” For instance, Gore likes to point out that Venus has far more CO2 in its atmosphere than the Earth does, and its surface is hot enough to melt lead. Therefore, more CO2 causes warming. But we also know that the Martian atmosphere has 15 times as much CO2 as our own atmosphere, and its surface temperature averages about 70 deg. F below zero. So you see, in science a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.”
Dr. James McClintock (marine biologist at UAB) today, in an op-ed piece published by the Birmingham News, claims that Antarctica is “warming quickly”. Dr. McClintock, I am sure, is an excellent marine biologist, and I would not even make an effort to challenge his knowledge of that science. But, what is his background in atmospheric science? And, where does that claim come from?
“The shattered part of the Wilkins ice sheet was 160 square miles in area, which is just 0.01% of the total current Antarctic ice cover, like an icicle falling from a snow and ice covered roof,” D’Aleo wrote on March 25. “We are very likely going to exceed last year’s record [for Southern Hemisphere ice extent]. Yet the world is left with the false impression Antarctica’s ice sheet is also starting to disappear,” D’Aleo added.
And, from climate scientist Ben Herman, past director of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics and former Head of the Department of Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Arizona: “It is interesting that all of the AGW (anthropogenic global warming) stories concerning Antarctica are always about what’s happening around the [western] peninsula, which seems to be the only place on Antarctica that has shown warming. How about the net ‘no change’ or ‘cooling’ over the rest of the continent, which is probably about 95% of the land mass, not to mention the record sea ice coverage recently.”
I also should note that the mythical UN IPCC “consensus” continues to crumble… Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist who specializes in optical waveguide spectroscopy from the University of Tokyo, and a top UN IPCC Scientist, calls global warming fears: the “worst scientific scandal in history” in the weblog of former Colorado State Climatologist Dr. Roger Pielke.
Here is what Canadian climatologist Tim Ball says about the IPCC: “The IPCC is a political organization and yet it is the sole basis of the claim of a scientific consensus on climate change. Consensus is neither a scientific fact nor important in science, but it is very important in politics. There are 2500 members in the IPCC divided between 600 in Working Group I (WGI), who examine the actual climate science, and 1900 in working Groups II and III (WG II and III), who study “Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability” and “Mitigation of Climate Change” respectively. Of the 600 in WGI, 308 were independent reviewers, but only 32 reviewers commented on more than three chapters and only five reviewers commented on all 11 chapters of the report. They accept without question the findings of WGI and assume warming due to humans is a certainty. In a circular argument typical of so much climate politics the work of the 1900 (less than one percent of the scientific population) is listed as ‘proof’ of human caused global warming. Through this they established the IPCC as the only credible authority thus further isolating those who raised questions.”
I find it interesting that most of the predictions coming from the IPCC are based on computer model output. Those of us in the trench, who deal with the Earth’s atmosphere every day, know that computer model data is often horrible 24 hours in advance… how bad can it be out to 50 or 100 years?
The Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine this month announced that 31,072 U.S. scientists (9,021 with PhDs) signed a petition stating that “… There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane or other greenhouse gases is causing, or will cause in the future, catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate…”
I encourage all of you to read material on BOTH sides of the issue and make up your own mind. Mr Gore, the science is “not settled”, and the invitation for a debate remains wide open.
Heaven help us this fall when ABC television tells us that the world, as we know it, is about to end because of “global warming”. Never let facts get in the way of a good story, especially one that scares you to death.
I consider myself an environmentalist. There are some serious environmental issues out there. “Global warming” is not one of them. One of the best ways to become a truly environmentally concerned person is to walk the banks of an Alabama river or stream for a half day and pick up trash and garbage. Anyone want to join me?
PSYCHIATRISTS have detected the first case of "climate change delusion" - and they haven't even yet got to Kevin Rudd and his global warming guru.
Writing in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Joshua Wolf and Robert Salo of our Royal Children's Hospital say this delusion was a "previously unreported phenomenon".
"A 17-year-old man was referred to the inpatient psychiatric unit at Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne with an eight-month history of depressed mood . . . He also . . . had visions of apocalyptic events."
(So have Alarmist of the Year Tim Flannery, Profit of Doom Al Gore and Sir Richard Brazen, but I digress.)
"The patient had also developed the belief that, due to climate change, his own water consumption could lead within days to the deaths of millions of people through exhaustion of water supplies."
But never mind the poor boy, who became too terrified even to drink. What's scarier is that people in charge of our Government seem to suffer from this "climate change delusion", too.
Here is Prime Minister Kevin Rudd yesterday, with his own apocalyptic vision: "If we do not begin reducing the nation's levels of carbon pollution, Australia's economy will face more frequent and severe droughts, less water, reduced food production and devastation of areas such as the Great Barrier Reef and Kakadu wetlands."
And here is a senior Sydney Morning Herald journalist aghast at the horrors described in the report on global warming released on Friday by Rudd's guru, Professor Ross Garnaut: "Australians must pay more for petrol, food and energy or ultimately face a rising death toll . . ."
Wow. Pay more for food or die. Is that Rudd's next campaign slogan?
Of course, we can laugh at this -- and must -- but the price for such folly may soon be your job, or at least your cash.
Rudd and Garnaut want to scare you into backing their plan to force people who produce everything from petrol to coal-fired electricity, from steel to soft drinks, to pay for licences to emit carbon dioxide -- the gas they think is heating the world to hell.
The cost of those licences, totalling in the billions, will then be passed on to you through higher bills for petrol, power, food, housing, air travel and anything else that uses lots of gassy power. In some countries they're even planning to tax farting cows, so there's no end to the ways you can be stung.
Rudd hopes this pain will make you switch to expensive but less gassy alternatives, and -- hey presto -- the world's temperature will then fall, just like it's actually done since the day Al Gore released An Inconvenient Truth.
But you'll have spotted already the big flaw in Rudd's mad plan -- one that confirms he and Garnaut really do have delusions.
The truth is Australia on its own emits less than 1.5 per cent of the world's carbon dioxide. Any savings we make will make no real difference, given that China (now the biggest emitter) and India (the fourth) are booming so fast that they alone will pump out 42 per cent of the world's greenhouse gases by 2030.
Indeed, so fast are the world's emissions growing -- by 3.1 per cent a year thanks mostly to these two giants -- that the 20 per cent cuts Rudd demands of Australians by 2020 would be swallowed up in just 28 days. That's how little our multi-billions of dollars in sacrifices will matter.
And that's why Rudd's claim that we'll be ruined if we don't cut Australia's gases is a lie. To be blunt.
Ask Rudd's guru. Garnaut on Friday admitted any cuts we make will be useless unless they inspire other countries to do the same -- especially China and India: "Only a global agreement has any prospect of reducing risks of dangerous climate change to acceptable levels."
So almost everything depends on China and India copying us. But the chances of that? A big, round zero.
A year ago China released its own global warming strategy -- its own Garnaut report -- which bluntly refused to cut its total emissions.
Said Ma Kai, head of China's powerful State Council: "China does not commit to any quantified emissions-reduction commitments . . . our efforts to fight climate change must not come at the expense of economic growth."
In fact, we had to get used to more gas from China, not less: "It is quite inevitable that during this (industrialisation) stage, China's energy consumption and CO2 emissions will be quite high."
Last month, India likewise issued its National Action Plan on Climate Change, and also rejected Rudd-style cuts.
The plan's authors, the Prime Minister's Council on Climate Change, said India would rather save its people from poverty than global warming, and would not cut growth to cut gases.
"It is obvious that India needs to substantially increase its per capita energy consumption to provide a minimally acceptable level of wellbeing to its people."
The plan's only real promise was in fact a threat: "India is determined that its per capita greenhouse gas emissions will at no point exceed that of developed countries."
Gee, thanks. That, of course, means India won't stop its per capita emissions (now at 1.02 tonnes) from growing until they match those of countries such as the US (now 20 tonnes). Given it has one billion people, that's a promise to gas the world like it's never been gassed before.
So is this our death warrant? Should this news have you seeing apocalyptic visions, too?
Well, no. What makes the Indian report so interesting is that unlike our Ross Garnaut, who just accepted the word of those scientists wailing we faced doom, the Indian experts went to the trouble to check what the climate was actually doing and why.
Their conclusion? They couldn't actually find anything bad in India that was caused by man-made warming: "No firm link between the documented (climate) changes described below and warming due to anthropogenic climate change has yet been established."
In fact, they couldn't find much change in the climate at all.
Yes, India's surface temperature over a century had inched up by 0.4 degrees, but there had been no change in trends for large-scale droughts and floods, or rain: "The observed monsoon rainfall at the all-India level does not show any significant trend . . ."
It even dismissed the panic Al Gore helped to whip up about melting Himalayan glaciers: "While recession of some glaciers has occurred in some Himalayan regions in recent years, the trend is not consistent across the entire mountain chain. It is, accordingly, too early to establish long-term trends, or their causation, in respect of which there are several hypotheses."
Nor was that the only sign that India's Council on Climate Change had kept its cool while our Rudd and Garnaut lost theirs.
For example, the Indians rightly insisted nuclear power had to be part of any real plan to cut emissions. Rudd and Garnaut won't even discuss it.
The Indians also pointed out that no feasible technology to trap and bury the gasses of coal-fired power stations had yet been developed "and there are serious questions about the cost as well (as) permanence of the CO2 storage repositories".
Rudd and Garnaut, however, keep offering this dream to make us think our power stations can survive their emissions trading scheme, when state governments warn they may not.
In every case the Indians are pragmatic where Rudd and Garnaut are having delusions -- delusions about an apocalypse, about cutting gases without going nuclear, about saving power stations they'll instead drive broke.
And there's that delusion on which their whole plan is built -- that India and China will follow our sacrifice by cutting their throats, too.
So psychiatrists are treating a 17-year-old tipped over the edge by global warming fearmongers?
Pray that their next patients will be two men whose own delusions threaten to drive our whole economy over the edge as well.
Amnesty International today released a report revealing the dire human rights and humanitarian crisis facing the people of Somalia.
The report contains first-hand testimony from scores of traumatised survivors of the conflict, exposing the violations and abuses they have suffered at the hands of a complex mix of perpetrators which include Somalia’s Transitional Federal Government (TFG) troops, Ethiopian troops, and various armed groups.
Amnesty International’s Africa Deputy Programme Director Michelle Kagari said: ‘The people of Somalia are being killed, raped, tortured; looting is widespread and entire neighbourhoods are being destroyed.’
Witnesses described to Amnesty International an increasing incidence of Ethiopian troops killing people by what is locally termed ’slaughtering’ or ‘killing like goats’ - referring to killing by slitting the throat.
Those killed are often left lying in pools of blood in the streets until armed fighters, including snipers, move out of the area and relatives can collect their bodies.
In one case, a 15-year-old girl found her father with his throat cut when she returned home from school after Ethiopian security forces had swept through her neighbourhood.
Other cases in the report include: A 56-year-old woman from Mogadishu called Haboon said Ethiopian troops had raped her neighbour’s 17-year-old daughter. When the young woman’s 13 and 14 year old brothers tried to protect their sister, the soldiers beat them and gouged out their eyes with a bayonet. The mother fled.
It is not known what happened to the boys. This girl is in a coma as a result of the injuries she sustained during the attack.
Qorran, another 56-year-old woman from Mogadishu, described how after her family went to bed, she went out to collect charcoal. While she was out, a rocket-propelled grenade was fired at her home, completely destroying it. She said, ‘When I came back, I couldn’t find my house.’ Her husband and sons were all killed in the attack. She told Amnesty International, ‘If grief is going to kill anyone it’s going to kill me.’
Guled, aged 32, who said that he saw his neighbours ’slaughtered’. Guled said he saw many men whose throats were slit and whose bodies were left in the street. Some had been castrated. He also saw women being raped. In one incident, more than 20 Ethiopian soldiers raped his newly-married neighbour when her husband was not home.
Michelle Kagari continued: ‘The testimony we received strongly suggests that war crimes and possibly crimes against humanity have been committed by all parties to the conflict in Somalia - and no one is being held accountable.
‘The human rights and humanitarian situation in Somalia is growing worse by the day. This report represents the voices of ordinary Somalis, and their plea to the international community to take action to end the attacks against them, including those committed by internationally-supported TFG and Ethiopian forces.’
Security in many parts of Mogadishu is non-existent and the entire city’s population bears the scars of having witnessed or experienced severe violations of human rights and international humanitarian law.
Michelle Kagari said: ‘There is no safety for civilians, wherever they run. Those fleeing violence in Mogadishu are attacked on the road and those lucky enough to reach a camp or settlement face further violence and dire conditions.’
Amnesty International’s report insists that the TFG, as the recognised government of Somalia, bears the primary responsibility for protecting the human rights of the Somali people. However, the Ethiopian military, which is taking a leading role in backing the TFG, also bears responsibility.
Kagari continued: ‘Attacks on civilians by all parties must stop immediately. Also, the international community must bear its own responsibility for not putting consistent pressure on the TFG or the Ethiopian government to stop their armed forces from committing egregious human rights violations.’
Amnesty International urged that the capacity of the UN Political Office for Somalia be strengthened, and that the African Union Mission to Somalia (or AMISOM) - and any succeeding UN peacekeeping mission - be mandated to protect civilians and include a strong human rights component with the capacity to investigate human rights violations.
The organisation also called for the UN arms embargo on Somalia to be strengthened, amongst other recommendations.
I always forget to tell people to check into the website for upcoming shows and for free downloads. A lot of this stuff is just recorded and passed around and people don't know the website even exists. So pass this around to the people that you know and it's helped people to look at things from a completely different perspective outside of the box. Outside of the low level matrix and this truly is a complete matrix.
The stuff we've been talking about so far even though it shocks some people and I've had people tell me that when they initially listened to my various shows they thought I was absolutely crazy and that's how it appears from someone inside the box. The Plato's Cave where everything's been made along and explained in the confines of that cave and you can make anything appear to be sensible if you've enough indoctrination whether it's a flat earth or a square earth or hollow earth. It's all the same stuff. Indoctrination attached to some imagination can do wonders.
It can take you on trips without the use of drugs and the spoken word and the written word have been used for thousands of years by masters in this field. We are guided through all these labyrinths through authorized authors and every age has them - the famous ones who create mystery and confusion and yet always guide us to the next point where the planners want us to arrive. It's an ongoing process.
The one connection everything has in your entire system is not a Catholic system or a Protestant system or a Jewish system, a Muslim system, a Buddhist system or any other type of system.
IT'S A FREE MASONIC SYSTEM. The one interlinking web between all - even the triads of China is Freemasonry. None other. It's interwoven throughout all the religions. All the creeds. All the peoples from the top of your system at the federal level. In fact, from the United Nations level is a fraternity of Freemasons in there. Their job is to get all the other ones who thought they were fighting each other at one point together.
YOU MUST CREATE CHANGE THROUGH CONFLICT OR THE APPEARANCE OF CONFLICT AND IT MUST BE REAL TO THOSE ENGAGED IN THE FIGHT. So THE ONES AT THE BOTTOMNEVER KNOW WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON.
A good example of this is what's happened for an awful long time since England was tampering into the affairs of Ireland and the troubles as it's called the conflict because they put a Presbyterian crew into Ulster who became the sort of overlords for a while in the 1800s of Ireland and this was guaranteed to cause trouble right up to the present time.
However, there are different factions that fight against them. The official IRA as it was called at one time was actually a communist sect and then you had the provincial group started up and out of all of this as they went through the routine of eventually seeming to disarm and come to terms in the last few years with England, low and behold Ireland is now in the Economic Union. They have the European Parliament over their heads. Well there's a freedom for you. So you come out after fighting all this time for some kind of freedom to find - because you think you're free or getting there you're actually under the EU. That's how clever this system is.
And many people in Ireland for instance are quite happy for the present because under the rules of the EU which is just a branch really of the UN as Karl Marx talked about they give tax monies as grants to start businesses up for the poorer countries. However, along with those grants they've given to Ireland they also have the Russian mob who's moved into Ireland big time to get the free grants. There's always a play here with preordained things going on and organizations that are kept quiet in the background and never connect them until you see them moving in. There are strategies going on all the time.
The one thing you'll find as I say to ALL of these CONFLICTING GROUPS is THERE ARE LEADERS INVOLVED WHO ARE ALSO FREEMASONS.
Recently, we saw an amazing funeral for President Ford and people sawA MASONIC PARADE and sawA MASONIC FUNERAL and to an extent is the exoteric part of it and Joe Public again chomps on his burger and thinks no more about it that FREEMASONRY IS INTERLINKED ALL THROUGH HIS POLICE, ALL THROUGH EVERY BOARD THAT DIRECTS HIS LIFE TO THE POLITICIANS TO THOSE ABOVE THE POLITICIANS. THROUGH THE MILITARY. THROUGH THE SECRET POLICE WE HAVE ALL OVER THE WORLD.
THEY'RE ALL FREEMASONS but we're suppose to just accept it as some kind of natural phenomena because they have this front for being a charitable organizations even though on their own websites these organizations will give you a public library which is rubbish and they will tell you they have the archives for their own members who must prove the membership.
In the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry they gave a tribute to Brother Ford and on their site they even put a picture up with all these guys with their suits on and the little pinafores you know the for of the pina - the pina-fore. At one time pinafores were something that women would use at the kitchen sink and these guys hardly wash dishes especially with those funny gloves on. But they have their pinafore kind of like American Indians only they have their legs covered and the pinafore in front and that's why in "The Pirates of Penzance" the opera that they go through a mock initiation and a lot of Masonic terms in the opera the ship was called "HMS Pinafore". It's flaunted in your face all the time.
Here's a blurb they did on their own website at the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry Washington, D.C. for the Southern Jurisdiction. They have jurisdictions, they have regions - that's where regionalization came. It's all Masonic and they also have lodges within those regions and they call they valleys and you'll get that from Francis Bacon's "New Atlantis". He talks about the people in the mountains and the valley people. The valley people were the lowest of the low so however those funny guys with their gloves and their pinafores.
Here's what they said:http://www.scottishrite.org/ee.php?/scottishrite/internal/local_masons_honor_brother_gerald_r_ford1/
"Masons from the Washington D.C. metro area gathered at Naval Lodge No. 4, located at 330--"
Alan:33 of course and the zero of course would be your degree.
"Pennsylvania Ave S.E., on Sunday December 31, 2006, to honor Brother Gerald R. Ford, 33rd, Grand Cross. The Brethren processed to the U.S. Capitol rotunda, stopping briefly in front of the Capitol at the statue of former President and Brother James A. Garfield. A brief speech was given by Brother Alan Patterson, Senior Warden of Naval Lodge No. 4. Washington, D.C. and a prayer by Brother Robert W. New, Chaplain for Acacia Lodge No. 16, in Clifton, Virginia. The Brethren waited their turn to show their respect and honor to their fallen Brother.Reporter Laura Marquez of Good Morning America, ABC News interviewed the Brethren, including Jules Tepper, Past Grand Master of the District of Columbia who described the bond Masons share and Brother Ford saying, “He built character. He built integrity."
Alan:He's a builder you see.
"He built honesty. Tepper was among a group of over 80 Brethren who paraded through the Capitol that morning. In his free time, Brother Tepper serves as a Masonic guide at the House of the Temple. People took photographs of the Masons, who were proudly wearing their regalia. The men were often questioned by Capitol Hill Police officers and others who were paying tribute to Ford, which gave them the opportunity to explain who they were and why they were there."
Alan:Yeah, they'd have to tell the police. What a joke. THE POLICE ARE FREEMASONS. EVERY COP KNOWS TO JOIN.
"Masons across the country are paying tribute to Brother Ford in various ways. In his home state of Michigan, Grand Master Walter F. Wheeler ordered the Freemasons to drape the altars in all 335 Masonic Lodges throughout the state for 30 days in memory of the former President and Brother."
Alan:The first photo that they show you on the site was from the Brethren from the Washington, D.C. metro area. The second photo - well there's a whole bunch of people in the back there. They tell you who they are and I'm sure who all are involved in politics and anything that really matters in this particular system. And it should be mentioned here too you see that EVERY PRESIDENT is offered the right to become a 33 degree Mason are these photographs with his - with all the regalia given to him during his little ceremony.
EVERY PRESIDENT IS GIVEN THE HONOR OF A 33 DEGREE IN FREEMASONRY. The reason they're given it is because THEY ALREADY ARE MASONS even some other lodges because all Masonic lodges are connected regardless of what they call it. It's the interwoven system which is all around us and we have the same in the female system with many names for the same thing and I've even seen people locally gathering information on the locals through gossip and you know which ones are doing it and that's how intelligence is gathered on everybody in your little community. Just through plain gossip.
The lower Masons they think they're builders are really rough Masons according to those at the top. They do what they're told to not only keep this system going, but they're told to spread the next part of the agenda amongst the populations. Many editors you find are Freemasons because they get up the ranks much quicker. Anyone who's useful in persuading populations to go in a certain direction - different things are always pulled out and pushed up much quicker. The ones at the bottom just tend to functions, do enough little speculation and participate in little rituals and think they understand it all and of course they wear little aprons to show you that from their loins comes supposedly more perfected beings and these characters at the bottom haven't been given the intergenerational wives to mate with so their children aren't different than anyone else's really. They don't even know what's going on but they're happy with their freebees.
So much mystique has been put out by Freemasonry to attract members in and mystery and fascination and myth. Yet if you go into the actual history of these societies they always called the majority of the public "the profane" those in the darkness their mon and it hasn't changed today. They guide the mob as they say. They are the lights that guide the mob. They take the credit for shaping the educational system. Well we know the brainwashing that's the whole agenda of education and guiding the future always.
During the 1600s and 1700s the pirates and Rosicrucian's with their Skull and Bones flag sailed the oceans just looting and burning ships. Looting and looting and looting and they didn't simply squander the money that they were looting. It went into a big, big kitty in selected places including old selected places which the Templars had been using since they pretended to disappear in North America long before Columbus came here. Then that money was used to raise certain families to the top to become leaders and create the foundations which now guide us.
Carroll Quigley talked about the foundations and how they're totally interconnected with the corporations - international corporations and the new system of the New World Order will be comprised of these big foundations and corporations which will then have a feudal type system with the foundations and corporations being the feudal overlords and that's already happened. It's here in fact.
All those in the military industrial complex all those corporations are part of it. The big companies that make the microchips and especially the ones that we'll all get chipped with eventually for our brains are all supra governmental organizations that even get indirect funding from the taxpayer. There's nothing new at all about public/private - you have the secret services the CIA type organizations involved. They have many front organizations which actually produce things especially in the technological area.
Now a while back I talked about the international science meeting that was held at Loyola University in Louisiana and it was pretty well all about the brain chip and it was discussed openly. The U.S. Department of Commerce - your tax money paid for this international meeting and politics was never mentioned by any scientist or any spokesperson during the entire meeting because they know that politics is just for the people down below. THEY WORK FOR THE REAL GOVERNMENT. THE REAL MOVERS AND SHAKERS OF THE WORLD WHO ARE THE REAL BUILDERS. THE REAL MASONS. THE ONES WHO REALLY BUILD IT, PLUS THE ARCHITECTS an awful lot higher than little guys with their little pinnes on and at that meeting at Loyola they talked about the fact that the chip was ready to go which means it's all tested and perfected and they have regional computers set up which will interface with everyone who gets chipped and will basically program each individual.
The only problem they said was to GET THE PUBLIC TO ACCEPT THE CHIP. One of the spokesman said, "this will be done mainly through propaganda and via entertainment." Entertainment is the easiest method of promoting an idea that becomes fascinating to the public. We get carried away with the tails and the mystique of the story never dawning on the real intent of what we're suppose to be downloaded with. They said that novels and cartoons and movies will not or we hope to but will have the chip in this way somewhere and it would take especially to the young because the young would think they'll be given special powers like the comic book characters. Well you probably know I guess a lot of you already know that this has been promoted. It's already been out through different movies and cartoons. Now the Public Broadcasting Service the PBS which has been one of the main areas for propagandizing the public through all these wildlife programs et cetera that's never ending and you can find about the sex life of ants after your dinner and stuff like that. While the PBS have all the stations and the PBS by the way is interlinked with the Canadian one and the U.S. are both - we get the same programs. They just move them around because it's all the same propaganda. They put out a pilot series - an exciting new pilot series and had a lot of the big experts on the futurists societies - now the futurists societies are where various scientists gather with novelists primarily and they dish out grants to certain novelists to write stories around the topics that are given. It's no different from how science itself works. You guide the course of science by handing out the grants to the scientists. THEY LIVE ON GRANTS THEIR WHOLE LIVES. So you direct the course of humankind by who you give the grants to and for what purpose. A guy that's trying to cure something will not get the grant. The guy who makes the weapon will if that happens to be the agenda. It's the same with novels since that's the main technique of bypassing the sensor part of our brain which would warn us about what's going on because it's weary. It's down when we're being entertained. So you wrap an exciting story with sex and violence to stimulate all the different neurons in the system. Brainwashing is better that way apparently and they know this. This is a fact and you wrap it up with special powers and so on and then you go on a journey and all the children will just love this series coming out and here's the blurb about the show.
http://www.pbs.org/22ndcentury/about.html
"Ever wonder what the world is going to be like in the future?"
Alan:Well gee, I don't know.
"Will people routinely live to see their 250th birthdays?"
Alan:Well maybe Maurice Strong and Rockefellers and Queen's own knight but since they have a Department of Population Control in the UN I doubt Joe Blow is going to see this.
"Will personal computers be smarter than us? "
Alan:Well let's hope so.
"(Or more personable?)
Alan:Well that's also maybe --
"Will machines shrink so small they can make repairs inside a human cell? Science fantasy or futuristic nightmare? 22nd Century takes you to the forefront of technology and hears from people on the cusp of a scientific revolution."
Alan:They're trying to make you think this is all brand new. They've had it sitting waiting in the wings.
"In the first episode we will meet a young man who was rendered unable to communicate with the outside world due to a devastating automobile accident."
Alan:Well there you go. It's going to help the poor and sick and disabled.
"Surgeons implanted an electrode in his brain and it has allowed him to break out of his isolation and communicate just by thinking about what he wants to say."
Alan:Well yeah isn't that nice and charitable and wonderful.
"In another segment a leading neurophysicist tells how he has developed bundles of wires thinner than spider webs that can be inserted into the blood vessels of human brains. The series is hosted by Robin Robinson,"
Alan:That's an interesting term. Robin Robinson. You see in the Middle Ages they had fertility rites and during the orgy part of the rites - this is for populations in Europe and it's all pre-Christian. It actually continued up through the Christian era. They just don't like to talk about it. The drive to lead was eradicated pretty early on but the offspring of that particular night ended up being called Robinson and the man who wore the red outfit was called Robin. Anyway I'm digressing.
"a Chicago-based journalist, who is joined by two virtual co-hosts,"
Alan:Virtual co-hosts hey.
"each with insightful and often conflicting viewpoints about the merits of this new technology. One is an actor playing Aldous Huxley"
Alan:Well my, my, my. I really am surprised. I'm falling off my chair. Aldous Huxley, the man who was only motivated from his perpetual death state really. I think they wound him up towards the end and put him on the stage. But he was animated when we talked about putting wires in peoples brains in Tavistock where he worked.
"the late author of Brave New World, who worried about the dehumanizing consequences of scientific discoveries."
Alan:He didn't worry about that at all. It takes a human to worry about these things.
"The other is Orlanda Bell,"
Alan:Orlanda Bell ooh interesting.
"a time-traveling visitor from the future, who represents the best-case scenario of these technological advancements. Is this a future that will benefit the human race? Or will we lose all sense of individuality? Find out on the premiere episode of the 22nd Century."
Alan:Interestingly enough they have a big sign underneath a part of the increasing disconnected personal relationships bit on their site.It's say sublimate. Isn't it interesting? You will be assimilated and the money that's gone in to this pilot series is big bucks, big, big bucks and you'll find there's big corporations and they've got professors involved in putting this together because it has a purpose - a big purpose beyond like all entertainment does today beyond simply passing your timeframe. This is important. Not surprising they've got Spielberg in unless he's come in to the main series, I don't know and of course they're going to tell the children that they you have telepathic thought. Oh wow. And then there's another about a guy with a computer in his skull and a computer for your eyes just like the borg had. It had one eye red and could see in the dark so that when your wife says have you been drinking again you can say no.
Wire your brain, watch the story. Rewired. I think that Wired Magazine has something to do about his as well. But you find these futurists think tanks as I say since the days of H.G. Wells brought in the scientists as I say with the novelists. Told them to wrap novels around particular stories. It's like smuggling something into a place and putting it there covertly and then walking away. You leave the package behind. That's how they download us with the real intent or the real idea and this will be fascinating to watch the couch potato people and those who get all their information from television and it certainly will be fascinating for the children. They'll want this. They really want it.
I've already had information from someone within the U.S. federal government that they've had think tanks working on giving it snob appeal to get adults to go for it. Now snob appeal you've seen used in advertising through different grades of cars and XL and all this kind of stuff. It gives it a snob appeal or that you'll get the bronze card or the silver card or the gold card or the platinum card. Same idea and like all this they want us to walk into the trap willingly. The willing fool.
THIS IS THE SYSTEM OF THE REALLY OCCULT HIERARHY THAT RUN THIS WORLD. They always get us to do things willingly.
So to continue with this little blurb here on Aldous Huxley the character visioning the future he's called a Luddite by a hologram guide woman for complaining about not wanting strangers inside his head. This will mean that no one will ever be lonely again.
Well isn't that nice. No more loneliness. Can't handle it. It's so awful to be alone - they'll give you the total makeover. The PBS website has that for viewing all this stuff and I'll mention it at the end of my present blurb. The propaganda that they give out here is:
"Many scientists and futurists believe we're on the verge of a technological revolution. It will look like a page ripped directly from a sci-fi novel."
Alan:And that's what you should do with them is rip them apart.
"22nd Century dives head-first into this brave new world on Wednesday, January 17, 2007, at 8 pm. The program is one of three science pilots airing on PBS in January; only one pilot will move forward to become a series. Watch online or on-air and then tell us what you think of the program using the feedback form below."
Alan:Now, that's the poll taking to see what they have to adjust to brainwash you more effectively and lots will do it do only to gladly.
"In the premiere episode, guests arrive from the future, past and present to guide you through a quirky tour of the “World Wide Mind,”
Alan:Oh, the WWM - the new world, right?
"an intriguing theory that proposes that in the future our brains will be wired up so that we can communicate with the world effortlessly and instantly."
Alan:They're doing all this because they love us. They love us they do.
"Science fantasy or futuristic nightmare? Watch the show and decide for yourself!"
Alan:And you can read about all of this if you really want to. I'm sure you all do at pbs.org/22ndCentury. This will be pushed to the hilt and they'll be a lot of spin offs and probably movies will come out in the mainstream all merging this stuff together until we're all wanting it. We’ll be panting for it where you'll live in a world where you be James Bond one day and King Lear the next. It will be fantastic and Aldous Huxley - the two - that's what Aldo means. It's the two. It's the two and it's a feminine and male meaning two. The dyad and Huxley's the hex - the way of the hex, the spell. These characters don't miss a trick and neither do the names they give them generations ago all beginning way back in Bacon's time.
So they're going to give you a fascinating things where you'll jump over big building like Superman in a giant stride and be like Spiderman and do fantastic things and you can kill whole armies just by thinking and they'll just get demolished in front of you. And you can have all kinds of strange weird sexual fantasies where sex will be better than sex and so on and that's where they're going to push this thing.
One of the first movies where they gave that idea of sex being better than sex through science was an old movie called, "Barbarella" with Jane Fonda. It's a surrealistic type novel and a lot of esoteric stuff written into it including the names of the people involved - the characters involved in the movie and they put their hands together and they have this strange organism and whole icebergs shatter et cetera and we saw the same thing in the Sylvester Stallone movies where he's brought back from cryogenics - the cop "Demolition Man".Same sort of idea and people will go for this because they'll always use the same techniques and sex never fails. That's why advertising uses it all the time.
You never change techniques when they work. You don't have to change them. You simply add something new on to them and lots of people are obsessed with it today because any drive within a person or a need for survival whether it's food or sex or whatever can be pushed to an extreme by constantly advertising it and that's what you see when they're sitting there watching TV they sit and eat and eat and eat because there's ads on all the time about smiling faces and how happy you're going to be if you just eat whatever it is you'll eat and that's what's been promoted since the '60s non-stop pretty well was the sexual aspect of things too to destroy the family and get promiscuity going and the idea of a special person is put out of your mind altogether. That was decided in the 1800s that that would be pushed and H.G. Wells wrote about it back then when he pushed the "free love" they called it at that time in the 1880s, 1890s.
There's nothing new here if you know your history at all and when you know the future this is to be expected this kind of stuff. But you also do understand by understanding humanity that many people will go for this and for those who will not go for it don't panic. Don't worry about it. You can't worry about the other people who will go along with it and you can't stop them either.
If ENOUGH CRISIS IS CREATED within this system which it will be - it's gradually increasing where you give them a pill that promises to ease their pain and their worry or a chip believe you me the people will take it when they come to a certain stress point and initially I'm sure a chip will have some of the lesser aspects of what they're promoting but very low down that is and they certainly can stimulate chemical releases within the brain - hormonal releases in different types and many kinds of hormones interact with chemicals in the brain to alter your mood, your states - altered states.
So you can certainly use that as a mechanical type means of tranquilizer and many people will take that if they're under enough stress and we certainly are under stress today as they give us panic from all directions and the average individual feels he's powerless or she's powerless and there's no point in saving up money even if you could because you're not in charge of how much it's worth or if it will be worthless tomorrow. So you're kept constantly on edge and that's how you control society keeping them on edge all the time.
Remember that this is an ongoing war and it's been going on long before you were born where elites have always gathered and discussed the purpose of humanity and the function of all the lesser peoples and who has the right to guide it and what is the function of the lesser peoples.
We're approaching the time when it's rather obvious since all the factories and so on have been taken out of Europe and the Americas and gone to China and that was planned long before I was born that EVENTUALLY WHOLE CATEGORIES OF PEOPLE WILL HAVE NO PURPOSE IN THIS SYSTEM. We can't all work on computers. Not everyone goes that way. People have different skills, different likes and dislikes and that's nature, that's natural but for those who control the world who see the world as being their and everyone in it as being theirs EVERYONE MUST HAVE A PURPOSE TO SERVE THE SYSTEM otherwise it's extraneous and they truly believe that the "useless eaters" must not be allowed to live that the "useless eaters" will drag the system down and this world must be run on efficiency. That's why they go on and on about the stuff we're squandering - we're consuming the planet - their planet remember and that really upsets them since they plan on their offspring running this world in the next thousand years or a million as Charles Galton Darwin talked about in his book and that's quite the boast.
And every great economist and great meaning big - anything that's great in history means it's one of theirs. Grand like the Grand Lodge is Great Lodge. So when we see GREATattached to anything you know IT'S THEIRS. Any great economist in the system - in the history of the system has been one of theirs has talked about the coming centuries and they wrote about this in the 1700s and the 1800s of how they'd have to eradicate certain peoples who would have no purpose in their system all based on evolution - superior and inferior types.
We should listen to the declarations of the United Nations very carefully. They declared that CHINA is the MODEL STATE of the ENTIRE WORLD.
That means that they're backing it as an example of how they're all suppose to go. Well look at China with their abortion policy. Their mandatory abortion for second children. A totalitarian system which supposedly is still Communist but really it's always be Fascist and they really are the same anyway. It doesn't make any difference. It's totalitarian and they're a rising middle class now who can afford to buy the products they make but they're also devastating the country with pollution. They don't have any restrictions there. Almost the same with Mexico. They have been given permission to pollute as much as they want because it's a temporary measure anyway and that tells us that at the rate of pollution in China that even those who are working in China in the future in the factories will be much smaller - in smaller factories, in smaller areas, communities and the peasantry will no longer be around. They're still bringing their water in from the rivers to irrigate the fields in China and the rivers are polluted to an incredible degree with heavy metals and such, just poured into them.
They've done documentaries on this and all the officials just throw up their hands and say well we just don't know what to do as always and it's rather obvious if you sit and think about it. Well yeah they'll still be the producers or manufacturers for the New World, but they have a much smaller production team required for a much smaller population of the world and they are dying off many of the so called peasantry. I hate that term but that's what they've given us as they wade up to their knees in muck or cadmium and other heavy metals and they scatter this on their fields because they have nothing else.
That's intentional. They are not dummies at the top. They know exactly what they're doing. Mistakes like this don't happen by chance and believe you me the elite will always look after their own survival in every era, always.
Now think about this chip again for a minute. "The chip off the old block."
Why would any individual allow his mind to be taken over by a creation of someone else whether you live a fantasy in your head which is electronically induced or whatever - someone else wrote the program. Someone else is now inside your head with their program and your thoughts will no longer be your own. Why would you give your right up to be completely dominated - completely 100% dominated - the dream of the tyrants down through the ages. Why would you give it all up and be sold a fantasy?
This is part of the dehumanizing process. You could never have taken this idea to a people who still held life up in any form of sanctity. You could never have promoted this idea to people who had true community and bonding with each other. You could never promote this idea where people had respect for the living and all life - all human life. And we've all lived through the era where science - the religion of science as it was designed to do has taken over from the old techniques of indoctrinations which still allowed us to be human. They hadn't quite taken that away from us and given it to the 'white coated priests' and the 'spin merchants' to dehumanize us until we don't care about all the body parts being sold like any other business all across the planet sold. Bought and sold body parts and it's hard to attack them under the guise of well we're helping somebody.
They can take us to the abyss and over through this technique if we allow it and we've all heard about the aborted fetal tissue being used for inoculations now. They use to use animals. They're using human tissue. That should be called cannibalism. You see the taking in of another's flesh in any form. It doesn't matter if you eat it or inject it. It's the same thing. It's cannibalism. That's what it is and it's a business. A business.
And we're so broken up from each other that we can sit and escape now and then within our minds into the happy, happy thoughts which again are generally promoted to us in fantasies because we don't want to look at these nasty things out there. Don't be so negative the New Agers say. In fact, the New Agers don't look at anything that's going to get them in the end. They're perfect. They're goners in fact. They've been trained not to look at the negative and yet LOOKING AT THE NEGATIVE IS A SURVIVAL MECHANISM
That's why when you see what's coming you get out of the way. Well don't be negative. Stick your head in the sand and chant on. There's no negativity here. When you understand what's happening you've broken through. When you've broken through the gossip, the reactions to the gossip and by that I mean politics and all that kind of stuff in the media - when you've broken through all of that and you don't react in the expected methods of being upset and angry and let's complain to our Congressman or a local representative - when you've broken past that and you know you're already run by a super government and every politician knows this. Every single one knows this.
When you've broken through all that and by passed it and flown above it then you won't be so worried and you won't be reacting. You'll be resolute but you can't be conned and you will have the ability to teach truth to others and hopefully children even when you're up against an amazing battle because they always fight for the children. It's the young ones coming up they must program. The older ones will always die off. This is ongoing.
In a true rounding in history with the massacres and the abuse of vast populations by the few must be taught to the children so that they will be able to see that this chip is being given us by our benefactors might not be so beneficial after all. After all, it's the benefactors who tell us that nature hasn't changed. Well neither has their hey. Not at all and I think of all the rebellions down through the thousands of years of oppressed peoples generally who are at the end of their tether because people don't rebel until they're against the wall and that itself is a predictable science. They know how far to push people before. They kick back or they scream or shout or whatever or start throwing stones against tanks and stuff like that. This is an old, old technique that's well understood.
People like peace even though their threatened they'll go to the very wall before they retaliate and then they become an unorganized mob. They have no communications or plan or anything else and they're up against organization. Well understood this is organization. Everything at the top and everybody in at the top is interconnected already towards this whole global agenda but you can certainly teach the children some truths and don't hold back on the horrors of the past to shield little Tommy from the truth. You're doing them no favors whatsoever. None at all.
People have fought for the freedom not only of what they do or say and that's been taken away to and think for thousands of years against those who are destroying and steal your whole mind and through entertainment they're going to be persuaded with the added frustration and fear with the new life that's coming - the gradual build up of fear and uncertainty they're going to go for this chip and give up the only thing they have. The only connection they have to something beyond all of this and everybody in it.
THE INDIVIDUAL CONNECTION. The Ghost in the Machine, you. We'll all be the borg because once enough people have this chip the real purpose will occur when they throw the switch and there's no more you. No more daydreams. No more affection. No more joy, tears, laughter all of that stuff and sorrow all part of being human they'll be none of that and they'll be no ability to even reach that again. In fact, they'll be no more you. You'll be an efficiently run robot.
There is nothing given out to the public that's for the publics benefit. Never has been. It's been to serve the business machine. The driving force and that's what it's been all about up until now and now they're after your mind as well. Not just a little plot of dirt you sit on or the labor they tax back from you with money but THEY WANT YOUR MIND AND THEY WANT EVERYONES MIND AND THE CHILDREN'S MINDS.
THEY WANT TO ERADICATE ALL CREATIVITY THAT'S OUTSIDE OF THEIR CONTROL. The dream that surpasses the dreams of every dictator from the ancient past to the present and we still have the same ones today. There’s no difference in personal makeup. In fact, often it’s the same lineages. It's definitely the same religion behind it and we're going to give all of that up for a fantasy.
Well oh goody and as Mr. Warwick that prune - a prune is something by the way that starts off rather tasty but tends to go right through you. That prune Warwick with his little injection in the brain. That's all it will be as he promotes this stuff as an exciting thing to have. We use to call that lobotomies and leucotomies. Anything stuck through your grey matter you see kills cells off but it's a good cause you see. We'll have world peace. We'll all be one. Wow. How exciting.
Do you know anybody outside yourself you'd like to be or be like? What's wrong with you? The joy in this life is finding out who you are and when the miracles apart from all the many, many miracles in this life is when you realize the abundance of different people with different things and different perspectives and views and at one time they were called characters. They had them all over the place. Today, they've become so similar. They've been eradicating the characters. What a sad, sad world that would be. The quiet earth where everybody's quietly working like robots or ants on their programmed tasks and they’re trying to make this exciting because they love you. They love you. Gush, gush, gush.
Don't panic. Teach those around you what you know. Don't panic when you tell them. Don't tell them about all the other stuff that you know. You'll terrify them. They're not ready for it. A little bit at a time is all you give them but the children must be told the histories of the tyrannies on this planet and the ongoing ones too. Don't shield them from it. They must know for their own survival.
Thanks for listening and for me it's good night and from Hamish the dog it's good night and may your god go with you.
Maybe tonight we'll talk about the interconnections of societies, the societies which guide our lives, which seem to be separate in people's minds and yet if you look at them all like sheepdogs and we're the sheep in the middle, you start to see the interconnections and how they're all coming towards us from the same direction at the same time. Then things start to make sense as to how programs are introduced into the public domain and then given government backing and they just happen to be right on time with the latest technologies that are going to save us all from whatever they claim.
One of the organizations – actually the main one which is behind most of what we think is culture and cultural change in society is the one you'll least hear of. You hear their front organizations which are staffed by these characters – I'm talking about freemasonry. You should go into the histories of freemasonry and you can find many of their own books which will not only boast or admit but boast about their part in the creation of our modern society. They'll boast about all the changes they made in previous societies to bring us to this stage, which is all supposed to be for the good of all.
They give us the education system, but they didn't just give us the education system and promote it. They also steer the education system worldwide. They decide what downloading is going to go into your child's mind. They boast about all the revolutions in history and how they've been behind them. They talk about an ongoing revolution.
You see, this is a religion here, a definite religion which doesn't let you into their church unless you join them. We pass by these lodges thinking they're just little meeting clubs, but, no, they're not. They're actually temples. Temple is a religious term and you must join them to be allowed in and under the guise of charitable works, they steer the course of society into a particular direction and they all come together.
As I say, everything comes together at the right time. All this networking and organization, massive organization and their members are in politics and the police force from top to bottom and the military from top to bottom, all through your bureaucracies. This is the religion that runs the world that we're taught drives funny little cars and wears funny little hats in parades for children and collects for charity; and what a great cover that is, because the active Masons are very active indeed and always have been and you'll find them as the CEOs of major corporations and foundations.
We can't forget that John Robison who wrote the book or one of the major books on the so-called Illuminati, which is just one Masonic branch, he talks about the coming foundations that they were organizing. Now Robison himself was a member of the English Grand Lodge before he joined the lower ranks of the Illuminati himself.
However, these foundations he said under charitable guises would eventually dominate the world and it's happened. The foundations dominate the world, the great Ford, Carnegie, Rockefeller and many, many more. They have them in every country on the planet. Guide the cultures of the people. Guide the updating and altering of the cultures – they guide the societal changes within those cultures.
WE LIVE IN A MASONIC WORLD AND IT'S VERY, VERY DEADLY SERIOUS.
And you have no idea of how many fingers are in the pies. If there's a finger in the pie, it's ALWAYS theirs.
This is a link I got from someone who wrote in from Missouri and it's the Missouri Freemasons, it's on their site. They are behind not just the nationwide but the worldwide promotion and this is the first step towards what we were talking about before with the brain chip, but they're behind microchipping of children with ID cards and things you can pin in your clothing, little active ID cards and chips; and believe it or not, it’s called The MoChip.
Alan: On their site (mochip.org) they say:
"Missouri Freemasons making a difference in our state and around the world…"
Alan: They certainly are, aren't they?
" …for your kids."
Alan: Kids are young goats. They promote that term as well. It's so funny because it says, "share a secret word, you and your parents." This is for the children.
"You and your parents should agree on a code word that is easy for you to remember. This way if anyone tells you that you need to come with them because your parents were hurt or in the hospital you can ask them for the code word…" Alan: The Masons have been using code words for centuries and centuries. Here they are at it again with your children.
"If they really are a friend they will know the code word that you and your parents share."
Alan: Now I wonder how they do that if you're parents are in the hospital and they are unconscious. Here's the blurb about the chip.
"MOCHIP is a comprehensive child identification program designed to give families of the State of Missouri…
Alan: It's all over actually.
"…a measure of protection against the ever increasing problem of missing and abducted children. Missouri Freemasons are bringing this program to communities throughout the State. The Masonic Children's Foundation is working with local Masonic Lodges to develop consistent and successful MOCHIP events as part of our ongoing commitment to Missouri's children and families. This program is provided "FREE OF CHARGE" to every Missouri family who participates.
Alan: Free, free, it's free.
"How does it work?
The program consists of five major components:
·Digital Photographs
·Digital Fingerprints
·Child Information and Emergency contacts
·Dental bite impression
·Two (2) laminated ID cards
We ask that all participants fill out a Permission Form to participate in the MOCHIP event.
Parents or guardians then fill out the Information Collection Sheet with information about their child. All information is voluntary.
The digital photographs, digital fingerprints and Child information and emergency contacts are given to the parent or guardian of the child on a mini-CD computer disk
Alan: They even spelled this wrong. Must be the low orders down at the Blue Lodge there.
"The inforamation on the disk is compatible with the format required by the "AMBER ALERT" program."
Alan: Now you see they are also behind the AMBER ALERT program. Now you have these huge screens across major highways that can punch up someone's name, the vehicle they're driving and tell every motorist to be on the watch for them and you know how that's going to be used in the future, and this was the Masons who pushed this thing. This is why you have it. Back to this one.
"The dental bite impression provides an impression of the biting surface of the child's teeth, which like fingerprints, are unique to each individual. The dental impression collects enough saliva to provide a DNA sample and a source for a scent for trained canine search and recovery teams. Together, these five measures provide a powerful and recovery tool.
The Masonic Children's Foundation retains no information concerning the children . . ."
Alan: Would they lie to you?
"…only the signed permission form is retained by the Foundation."
Alan: Now it's a foundation and this is in every state in the U.S. and it's in Canada. It's across the planet. That's who's pushing it in combination with the corporations who make all this stuff and all the technology that goes with it and once you've accepted all of this, of course, you know where that's going. It's going to step-by-step to the body chip to the brain chip. That's the whole idea – get the sheep used to it so they're not getting spooked all the time and go to the next level. The Masons are behind all of this and of course you don't want to believe that, do you, because you're grandpa or whoever is in it, one of your relatives, and you know they're nice people, but they're an organized bunch of nice people and they certainly do have an agenda to fulfill.
This MOCHIP is also called MasoniChip and says, "it's one of the most comprehensive child recovery and identification programs in the nation, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children." It's state and national and international, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, because they care about you.
What they say is "MOCHIPS events are scheduled year round at various events throughout the state. Currently there are 101 events coming up. (That's in the one state Missouri.) For additional details as to event, dates, location," blah blah blah, "go to our calendar page," and they have grants from the government for this, by the way. They're a tax-exempt foundation under a charity, just like all the other foundations and the big corporations that make all of this stuff they want your child to carry around and eventually be implanted with are also freemasons. That's your connecting link with everything, always is, in every people, every race, creed, et cetera, you'll find it's freemasonry on all sides of everything.
Australian artists are defending the controversial decision of Art Monthly magazine to run a photograph of a naked child on its front cover.
The front cover of the magazine features Melbourne photographer Polixeni Papapetrou's 2003 photo of her naked daughter, who was six at the time.
The New South Wales Government is referring the magazine to the Classification Board.
The Prime Minister has said he cannot stand the picture and federal Arts Minister Peter Garrett has said the magazine was being needlessly provocative.
The girl's father, art critic Robert Nelson, says the family has no regrets about the photograph and he has rejected the Prime Minister's criticism of the work.
"There's never been any study that suggests that there's a link between paedophilia and art," he said.
"Unfortunately we're working without any science; people are just making these assertions about protecting children, which is unarguable - I mean why would you not want to [protect them]?
"But no-one's really explained, protect them from what."
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd says no child that age could give their consent to such work but Mr Nelson says Mr Rudd should back up his concerns with evidence.
"I think he's welcome to have an opinion on art - I think that's to be encouraged," Mr Nelson said.
"I think the problem arises when, as he did with Bill Henson, he declared that the images are revolting and linked them to the protection of children without a shred of evidence."
But Joe Tucci from the Australian Childhood Foundation says parents should not be allowed to give consent to posing naked on behalf of their children.
"They have the legal right to consent on behalf or their child, but I don't think they have the ethical right to do that," he said.
"I think you can't tell now what the impact will be on that child even today."
'Business as usual'
Fellow artists are defending the magazine's decision to use the photograph on its cover.
The magazine's editor says the image was published in an attempt to "validate nudity and childhood as subjects for art".
He said he wanted to restore some dignity to the debate following the controversy in May, when artist Bill Henson's photographs of a naked prepubescent girl in a Sydney gallery were confiscated by police.
Martyn Jolly is the co-author of an article on the controversy that is published in the same edition of Art Monthly. He is also the head of photography and media arts at the Australian National University.
"The original photograph, the Bill Henson photographs have been found to be OK ... they were passed by the Board of Review," he said.
He says putting the photo on the front cover was just "business as usual".
"It could be a provocation or it could be simply saying, 'No we aren't going to ... buckle'," he said.
"We aren't going to let this small pressure group dictate what we can and can't show. We aren't going to let the tabloid media, who are always wanting to create media panics, dictate what we can and can't show.
"And we aren't going to let politicians who are always wanting to jump on populist bandwagons dictate what we can and can't show."
'Artistic duty'
Mr Jolly says the magazine had a duty to reignite the debate over children in art.
"I guess if you're the editor of a magazine which is meant to be reporting on Australia on a month-by-month basis and this has been the biggest thing in Australian art for a long time, you'd be [neglecting] your duty if you didn't actually discuss the debate," he said.
Art Monthly receives funding from the Australia Council, which has issued a statement saying the magazine has been and remains a very effective and valuable means of communication for the visual arts.
"We don't think it appropriate to judge any journal covering a wide field of interests and a diverse range of issues on one deliberately provocative statement which in itself is reaction to an already overheated controversy," the statement read.
"For many years our society has managed to differentiate between artistic creativity and the totally unacceptable sexual exploitation of children.
"Continuing to argue extreme positions is not creating any greater clarity."
The magazine is also funded by the Federal and ACT Governments, and ACT Chief Minister Jon Stanhope has defended the magazine's right to publish the photo.
Mr Stanhope says he has not seen the picture but he says the magazine is a reputable publication.
"To suggest that this particular photograph that's on the cover of this paper is in anyway pornographic or represents child pornography - I haven't seen it but that's a huge leap to suggest that a photograph of a young child is inherently pornographic if it is displayed publicly," he said.
"That's a concept that causes me enormous difficulty."
The Federal Government says the Australia Council will now be asked to draw up a set of protocols on the representation of children in art.
B.C. parents could soon be sending their toddlers off to school as the provincial government considers full-day pre-kindergarten for three- and four-year-olds and full-day kindergarten for five-year-olds.
The proposal is currently under review by the Ministry of Education after the B.C. government committed to studying the feasibility of providing full-day kindergarten for five-year-olds in the 2008 throne speech. The ministry is also considering day-long pre-kindergarten for four-year-olds by 2010 and three-year-olds by 2012.
The proposal is based on studies that show children between the ages of three and five are at an ideal age to begin learning.
Many school districts have already established pilot projects to see if full-day kindergarten is successful. But the proposal has critics, with some wondering how the government will pay for more class time in the face of declining enrollment and school closures. Others worry about sending their kids off to school too soon.
The Early Childhood Learning Agency, a special Ministry of Education branch announced in the throne speech, has been tasked with providing a report to government on the idea.
Will future humans have computers implanted in their brains? Researchers are developing a neural implant that can think independently—just like the human brain does. Creepy? Yeah. Cool? Definitely. Scientists at the University of Florida aren’t just creating a neural implant that can translate human brain signals, but one that can act independently to increase its efficiency and synergy with the brain as it learns new things.
"In the grand scheme of brain-machine interfaces, this is a complete paradigm change," said Justin C. Sanchez, Ph.D., a UF assistant professor of pediatric neurology and the study's lead author. "This idea opens up all kinds of possibilities for how we interact with devices. It's not just about giving instructions but about those devices assisting us in a common goal. You know the goal, the computer knows the goal and you work together to solve the task."
These “brain computers” are programmed with complex algorithms that can interpret thoughts. But the algorithms used in current brain-machine interfaces are incapable of adapting to change, Sanchez explains. They are order-takers, but not adaptive problem-solvers.
"The status quo of brain-machine interfaces that are out there have static and fixed decoding algorithms, which assume a person thinks one way for all time," he said. "We learn throughout our lives and come into different scenarios, so you need to develop a paradigm that allows interaction and growth."
Sanchez and his colleagues tested out evolving brain-machine interface using rats.
The rats’ brains were fitted with tiny electrodes that capture thought signals. Three rats were taught how to move a robotic arm toward a target using just their thoughts. Each time they succeeded, the rats were rewarded.
The computer, on the other hand, was programmed to earn as many points as possible by figuring out how to help the rat. The closer a rat moved the arm to the target, the more points the computer received, which helped the computer determine which brain signals lead to the most rewards. The computer then knew how to streamline the process to make it more efficient and ultimately easier for the rats.
The researchers made things progressively more difficult for the rats by requiring them to hit targets that were placed farther and farther away. However, the symbiotic relationship between the computer and the rats allowed the rats to complete tasks more efficiently each time despite the increasing difficulty.
So how does this all apply to humans? Well, there’s not a lot of legitimate funds available out there to turn humans into superhuman cyborgs “just for fun” (well, other than DARPA funding, of course), so initially the technology will be developed for therapeutic applications, such as allowing paraplegics victims to control their own limbs again and so forth.
However, there is a whole slew of other fantastic sci-fi inspired applications that are theoretically possible with this type of computer “symbiote” implants. For example, how would you like to be able to calculate enormous equations in your own head? You’d just think about what you wanted calculated and your neural implant would do the work for you instantaneously. Or how would you like the entire library of congress stored neatly in your brain where you can access any kind of information you’d ever want instantly just by thinking about. You wonder to yourself, “When was Abraham Lincoln born?” Your symbiote could then theoretically feed the correct answer back to you in what felt as natural as your own thoughts.
Mental work like creating company reports and term papers would become ridiculously easy. It’d be better than having a photographic memory, but of course with a neural implant you could theoretically have one of those too! Your implant could easily store an image of everything you’ve ever looked at, especially the way micro data storing technology is developing.
Neural implants would also allow people to control heavy machinery (or gigantic evil robots) with nothing but their thoughts remotely—perhaps even halfway around the world. However, giving a “thinking” computer a portion of the steering wheel, could conceivably raise a whole new class of questions about who’s really in charge. Up until now, brain-machine interfaces have always been designed as a one-way conversation between the brain and a computer. The brain gives the instructions and the computer merely follows commands. But now, according to findings published this month online in the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers journal IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, the system UF engineers created gives the computer a say in that conversation, as well.
Just imagine the autoworker in court convincingly replacing the outdated “devil made me do it” argument with “my neural implant made me do it…I mean, sure I thought about crushing my boss with that 2 ton metallic robot arm, but I had no idea my neural implant would take me so seriously.”
Marvel Comics first coined the term symbiote to denote a sentient organism that bonds with other organisms in a co-captain style of control where both organisms think synergistically—although the symbiote always seems to have the upper hand. In sci-fi, symbiotes have incredible adaptive attributes and quickly adapt to and enhance the abilities of the human they bond to while granting them a range of other incredible powers to boot. Traditional comic book symbiotes have been biological extraterrestrial aliens, but the real life expression of symbiotes could end up being advanced computer systems—hopefully programmed without the volatile and murderous urges that defined their fictional counterparts. In theory, a computer-brain interface could allow people to download a program that makes them think more creatively. You could download a movie you’ve been wanting to watch and just relax anywhere while it plays out in your head.
The sci-fi inspired implications are staggering. Will it give humans ESP using blue tooth technology to “beam” thoughts directly from one implant to another? What if you could somehow remotely override someone else’s neural computer? In theory you could control their physical actions and even their words. Or what if neural implants become commonplace enhancements for those who can afford it, effectively separating the human race into two major classes—superhuman vs the non-enhanced?
The questions and implications are endless, and while they are all likely far away possibilities, we now know its not just fiction. In reality, technological advancements often lead to real changes that are much stranger that fiction. The eventual melding of the human mind with advanced computer technology would revolutionize the world ways that we cannot even possibly imagine.
The Pentagon seems to have decided that anthropology is to the war on terror what physics was to the Cold War. As an anthropologist, this makes me very nervous.
Where former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld believed that the United States would vanquish its enemies through technological superiority, his replacement Robert Gates has said that cultural expertise in counterinsurgency operations will be crucial in the future wars he anticipates.
When research that could be funded by neutral civilian agencies is instead funded by the military, knowledge is subtly militarized and bent in the way a tree is bent by a prevailing wind."
For those anthropologists who don't judge the vitality of our discipline solely in terms of revenue streams, the Pentagon's new interest in culture is worrying. So far the Pentagon has announced two major initiatives to mobilize anthropological knowledge for war. The first is the Human Terrain Team system, to which Gates allocated $40 million in September 2007. The Pentagon plans 26 Human Terrain Teams--one for each combat brigade in Iraq and Afghanistan. The five-person teams include three military personnel. Each team also includes an anthropologist--or another social scientist--who will wear a military uniform and receive weapons training. Described as doing "armed social work" by David Kilcullen, an Australian expert in counterinsurgency who advises Gen. David Petraeus in Iraq, the teams elicit information from villagers for Pentagon databases and provide cultural orientation to U.S. military leaders.
According to a scathing article in Newsweek, thus far, few of the embedded social scientists recruited speak local languages or know much about local culture. For example, the best-known embedded anthropologist, Marcus Griffin of Christopher Newport University in Virginia, is mainly knowledgeable about Filipino hunter-gatherers and Freegan dumpster-divers in the United States. One wonders how useful his military colleagues find his "cultural expertise."
Last year, the Executive Board of the American Anthropological Association (AAA) issued a statement condemning the use of anthropologists in Human Terrain Teams. Why would the AAA object to anthropologists doing their bit for the war on terror? After all, perhaps anthropologists could help smooth out some of the cultural misunderstandings between U.S. troops and locals that have exacerbated violence in Iraq and Afghanistan? Is this political correctness run amok?
One cannot grasp AAA's concerns without understanding that anthropologists have a unique research method that brings with it special ethical responsibilities: We engage in what one anthropologist has called "deep hanging out" with people, passing the time with them, often day after day for months, painstakingly earning their trust and getting them to tell us about their worlds. What distinguishes anthropology from espionage (apart from anthropologists' impenetrable jargon) is that we seek the consent of our subjects, and we follow an injunction to do no harm to those we study. According to the anthropological code of ethics, our obligations to those we study trump all others--to colleagues, funders, and nation. (It's for this reason that Franz Boas, the father of American anthropology, famously condemned four colleagues for using anthropological research as cover for spying during World War I.)
Embedded anthropologists are on shaky ethical terrain because they cannot realistically get free consent from their interlocutors while dressed in camouflage and traveling with U.S. soldiers in Humvees. Similarly, they cannot control the use of the information they collect for the military, and thus, cannot ensure it isn't used to harm communities they study. For instance, during the Vietnam War, under Project Phoenix, anthropological knowledge was used to target villagers for assassination.
There's also the obligation to colleagues. Most anthropologists report at some point being suspected of working for U.S. intelligence by those they study. I experienced this myself when doing research in Russia. Therefore, every anthropologist in camouflage casts a pall of suspicion over the rest of us.
The second Pentagon program is Project Minerva, which Gates announced in April. Funded at $50 million over the next five years, Minerva is designed to mobilize social scientists for open research related to the war on terror. Gates mentioned his hope that anthropologists would apply. The projects envisaged under Minerva include translating and analyzing captured Iraqi documents, helping collate open-source documents pertaining to Chinese military policy, researching the relationship between Islam, violence, and terror, and proposing new experimental fields, which as Gates put it in his speech, might be as useful in the war on terror as game theory proved during the Cold War.
Minerva doesn't entail the obvious ethical liabilities for anthropologists that mar the Human Terrain Team experiment. Also, to give the Pentagon its due, military program officers have striven to make this program as open as possible: Captured Iraqi documents and information about Chinese military programs will be posted to websites where they will be accessible to scholars, or curiosity-seekers, anywhere in the world. Likewise, the call for proposals to research Islam and violence, or to develop new inter-disciplines, emphasizes that the research will be unclassified and that scholars from any country are free to apply.
Still, following the announcement of Minerva, Setha Low, AAA's president, wrote PDF to Gates and others expressing some concerns about the program's implementation. (Full disclosure: I was consulted about the letter's phrasing.) AAA's core concern is that the Defense Department has a well-established track record funding research in science and engineering, but not the social sciences-- and especially not anthropology. There are, however, federal agencies--the National Science Foundation (NSF) comes to mind--that have great experience in funding exactly the kind of research at Minerva's core. If the federal government wants to fund free and open scholarly research on, say, Islam and terror, why not do so through the normal channels for inviting and adjudicating such research? NSF is skilled and practiced at doing peer review of such research; Defense is not.
While the obvious danger that concerns the AAA is of an amateurish and misshapen review process that produces a research program that isn't all it could be, there's a deeper and less obvious danger, too. When research that could be funded by neutral civilian agencies is instead funded by the military, knowledge is subtly militarized and bent in the way a tree is bent by a prevailing wind. The public comes to accept that basic academic research on religion and violence "belongs" to the military; scholars who never saw themselves as doing military research now do; maybe they wonder if their access to future funding is best secured by not criticizing U.S. foreign policy; a discipline whose independence from military and corporate funding fueled the kind of critical thinking a democracy needs is now compromised; and the priorities of the military further define the basic terms of public and academic debate.
For all of these reasons, I know that Franz Boas would have been as worried as I am.
