Tuesday, November 27, 2007

They Live Taser Saucer To Become A Reality

UN declares stun guns to be instruments of torture while Taser rep says "it's not real pain" and puts drone craft into development

Infowars.net | November 26 , 2007
Steve Watson

One of the biggest Taser representatives outside the US base has declared the company's intention to produce and sell internationally a small airborne drone version of the weapon that can administer electrical jolts of 50,000 volts.

Antoine di Zazzo has told the AFP that his French company is "developing a mini-flying saucer like drone which could also fire Taser stun rounds on criminal suspects or rioting crowds. He expects it to be launched next year and to be sold internationally by Taser."

The idea conjures up memories of the flying saucer spy drones from the 1988 dystopian cult classic movie They Live . The opening of George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty Four also features the idea of police flying overhead and snooping into homes. Now this nightmare vision is set to become reality.

With 250,000 Taser stun guns in use all over the world from North America, Australia, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Australia, Singapore and New Zealand, to name just a few of 70 or so countries, it hardly takes a stretch of the imagination to foresee the take up of Taser's airborne drones.

In addition we have also seen moves by police forces around the world to test and use flying drones. Most recently controversy was raised after it was discovered that Houston police have been secretly testing spy drones that use a high-powered cameras designed to look into buildings or even follow people in moving cars.

Drone Planes are not new to the United States. The military has been using drones for secret war zone surveillance for years; drones were also used to put out the California wildfires last month. The drones used for the test in Houston weigh only 40 pounds, but can carry 15 pounds more in gear. They are able to stay airborne 15 to 24 hours without landing.

Reports from June indicated that the Department of Homeland Security used a spy drone to stake out the property of income tax protestors Ed and Elaine Brown before they were arrested in September. In April the British press reported on a British amateur inventor who won a contract with the US government for a 3ft-wide flying saucer contraption, a cross between a hovercraft and a helicopter, which is being considered as a surveillance tool.

We have also recently seen drones used to keep tabs on concert goers in Britain. Such devices have since been deployed by police in areas of the UK for "tackling anti-social behaviour and public disorder". Other reports have highlighted interest in drones and testing by police departments nationwide. Some protestors are even adamant that they have witnessed tiny insect like drones in deployment at anti war rallies. Such creations are certainly in development if not already in deployment.

Taser has been mired in controversy, since the wide uptake of its stun guns by police forces, due to the level of pain the devices inflict and the amount of deaths that have occurred after their use. Last week a perfectly healthy 20 year old man died in police custody after being shocked with a taser. Another 36-year-old man died Saturday five days after an altercation with police who used a Taser to subdue him. Last month a Polish man was killed at Vancouver airport after being stunned up to 4 times.

Further questions have been raised over more frequent police use of tasers. The guns are supposed to be the last response before lethal action, however, we have increasingly reported cases where police use them without warning and in non threatening situations.

Amnesty International has said there have been about 300 deaths around the world after Taser use and has called for it to be suspended while a full investigation into the impact is conducted.

On Friday, a UN Committee said the stun gun "causes acute pain, constituting a form of torture ".

Despite this Antoine di Zazzo of Taser International says that no death has been attributed to the use of the gun and that the controversy is caused by misunderstanding of new technology.

When asked about the UN verdict on the weapons di Zazzo replied "You cannot call it real pain," and added that far from causing death, the gun "saves lives".

How long will it be before small flying saucer drones are zipping around our cities zapping people in order to "save lives"?

Monday, November 26, 2007

"Psychodynamics of Sado-Masochism and its Scientific Societal Manipulation by the Dominant Minority"

Very few people today in this day and age - very, very few are actually true individuals as such. We see teenagers who go through a stage where they think they want to be an individual and they are in a sense one by one trying to assert their own different personality, but you'll notice to be different they actually join a group never realizing that the group itself or the fashion that they wear or the symbols that they use and the behavior and the conduct is marketed to them from the top. So there's your paradox in trying to be different as a teenager. In reality, they want to be accepted by a peer group and so they conform to that group. Adults are not too much different. Plato himself said that morality and culture which is given by the top - what's right one day can be made wrong the next and vice versa. He said we can turn it upside down and the last ones to notice is the generation that's going through the changes they adopted so easily and casually and they think the idea somehow originated within them. Continued

Thursday, November 22, 2007


Hat Tip to Earl1911 for finding these!

Where is the G-damn f**king flag? I want the G-damn f**king flag up every f**king morning at f**king sunrise.” (From the book “Inside The White House” by Ronald Kessler, p. 244 - Hillary to the staff at the Arkansas Governor’s mansion on Labor Day, 1991)

“You sold out, you mother f**ker! You sold out!” (From the book “Inside” by Joseph Califano, p. 213 - Hillary yelling at Democrat lawyer.)

“It’s been said, and I think it’s accurate, that my husband was obsessed by terrorism in general and al-Qaida in particular.” (Hillary telling a post-9/11 world what a ‘great’ commander in chief her husband was; Dateline, NBC 4/16/2004.)

“I have to admit that a good deal of what my husband and I have learned [about Islam] has come from our daughter.” (TruthInMedia.org 8/8/1999 - Hillary at a White House function, proudly tells some Muslim groups she is gaining a greater appreciation of Islam because Chelsea was then taking a class on the “religion of peace”)

F**k off! It’s enough that I have to see you shit-kickers every day, I’m not going to talk to you too!! Just do your G*damn job and keep your mouth shut.” (From the book “American Evita” by Christopher Anderson, p. 90 - Hillary to her State Trooper bodyguards after one of them greeted her with “Good morning.”

“You f**king idiot.” (From the book “Crossfire” p. 84 - Hillary to a State Trooper who was driving her to an event.)

“If you want to remain on this detail, get your f**king ass over here and grab those bags!” (From the book “The First Partner” p. 259 - Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident.)

“Get f**ked! Get the f**k out of my way!!! Get out of my face!!!”(From the book “Hillary’s Scheme” p. 89 - Hillary’s various comments to her Secret Service detail agents.)

“Stay the f**k back, stay the f**k away from me! Don’t come within ten yards of me, or else! Just f**king do as I s ay, Okay!!!?” (From the book “Unlimited Access”, by Clinton FBI Agent in Charge, Gary Aldrige, p. 139 - Hillary screaming at her Secret Service detail.)

“Many of you are well enough off that [President Bush’s] tax cuts may have helped you. We’re saying that for America to get back on track, we’re probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We’re going to have to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.” (Hillary grandstanding at a fund raising speech in San Francisco; SFGate.com 6/28/2004.)

“Why do I have to keep proving to people that I am not a liar?!”(From the book “The Survivor,” by John Harris, p. 382 - Hillary in her 2000 Senate campaign)

“Where’s the miserable c*ck sucker?” (From the book “The Truth About Hillary” by Edward Klein, p. 5 - Hillary shouting at a Secret Service officer)

“No matter what you think about the Iraq war, there is one thing we can all agree on for the next days - we have to salute the courage and bravery of those who are risking their lives to vote and those brave Iraqi and American soldiers fighting to protect their right to vote.” (Was posted on Hillary Clinton’s senate.gov web site on 1/28/05)

“Put this on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo. I need those sunglasses. We need to go back!” (From the book “Dereliction of Duty” p. 71-72 - Hillary to Marine One helicopter pilot to turn back while en route to Air Force One.)

A right-wing network was after his presidency…including perverting the Constitution.” (To Barbara Walters about the Republicans who impeached her husband; 20/20, ABC 6/8/2003.)

“What are you doing inviting these people into my home? These people are our enemies! They are trying to destroy us!” (From the book “The Survivor” by John Harris, p. 99 - Hillary screaming to an aide, when she found out that some Republicans had been invited to the White House)

“I mean, you’ve got a conservative and right-wing press presence with really nothing on the other end of the political spectrum.” (C-Span, 1/19/1997 - Hillary complains about the mainstream media, which are all conservatives in her opinion)

“Come on Bill, put your dick up! You can’t f**k her here!!” (From the book “Inside The White House” by Ronald Kessler, p. 243 - Hillary to Gov. Clinton when she spots him talking with an attractive female at an Arkansas political rally)

“You know, I’m going to start thanking the woman who cleans the restroom in the building I work in. I’m going to start thinking of her as a human being” (From the book “The Case Against Hillary Clinton” by Peggy Noonan, p. 55)

“You show people what you’re willing to fight for when you fight your friends.” (From the book “The Agenda” by Bob Woodward, ch. 14)

“We are at a stage in history in which remolding society is one of the great challenges facing all of us in the West.” (From the book “I’ve Always Been A Yankee Fan” by Thomas D. Kuiper, p 119 - During her 1993 commencement address at the University of Texas)

“The only way to make a difference is to acquire power” (From the book “I’ve Always Been A Yankee Fan” by Thomas D. Kuiper, p 68 - Hillary to a friend before starting law school.)

“We just can’t trust the American people to make those types of choices…. Government has to make those choices for people” (From the book “I’ve Always Been A Yankee Fan” by Thomas D. Kuiper, p 20 - Hillary to Rep. Dennis Hastert in 1993 discussing her expensive, disastrous taxpayer-funded health care plan)

“I am a fan of the social policies that you find in Europe” (From the book “I’ve Always Been A Yankee Fan” by Thomas D. Kuiper, p. 76 - Hillary in 1996)

Hat Tip Joe http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2007/03/hillary-clinton-get-fcked.html


Wednesday, November 21, 2007

The Ringworm Children

In 1951, the director general of the Israeli Health Ministry, Dr. Chaim Sheba flew to America and returned with 7 x-ray machines, supplied to him by the American army.

They were to be used in a mass atomic experiment with an entire generation of Sephardi youths to be used as guinea pigs. Every Sephardi child was to be given 35,000 times the maximum dose of x-rays through his head. For doing so, the American government paid the Israeli government 300 million Israeli liras a year. The entire Health budget was 60 million liras. The money paid by the Americans is equivalent to billions of dollars today. To fool the parents of the victims, the children were taken away on "school trips" and their parents were later told the x-rays were a treatment for the scourge of scalpal ringworm. 6,000 of the children died shortly after their doses were given, while many of the rest developed cancers that killed them over time and are still killing them now. While living, the victims suffered from disorders such as epilepsy, amnesia, Alzheimer's disease, chronic headaches and psychosis

Saturday, November 17, 2007

At U.N. forum, U.S. control over Net is the No. 1 topic


RIO DE JANEIRO, Brazil -- U.S. control over how Internet addresses are assigned -- and thus how people around the world get access to e-mail and Web sites -- dominated discussions as a major U.N. conference on the Internet opened here Monday.

Although few participants at the Internet Governance Forum attacked the United States directly, most were well aware of the role Americans play over domain name policies, including whether and how to assign suffixes in languages besides English.

"The Internet is transnational. It can't be under the authority of one country or even some countries," said Brazil's culture minister, Gilberto Gil, setting the conference's tone at the opening ceremony. "The Internet should be the territory of everyone."

At issue is control over domain names, the monikers after the "dot" such as "com" and "org" that are crucial for computers to find Web sites and route e-mail. By controlling the core systems, the U.S. indirectly influences much of the Internet.

The U.S. government, which funded much of the Internet's early development, delegated policies over domain names to a Marina del Rey, Calif.-based non-profit, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, over which the United States retains veto power.

Many critics fear opening ICANN up to an organization such as the United Nations could allow governments to politicize the Internet and more easily impose censorship.

Paul Twomey, ICANN's president and chief executive, said his organization was effectively "international," with only three of its 15 board members coming from the United States. The newly elected chairman is from New Zealand, and Twomey is from Australia.

Twomey said he believed the debate over U.S. control was being fueled by "high politics."

"The discussion of the role of ICANN has gone on for some time, but there is no consensus for change," Twomey said, adding he believed the discussion distracted from more important issues.

Friday, November 16, 2007


Strange things happen once in a while in all our lives, things which are inexplicable to an extent. Today was one of those days for me. When I got up wondering about the spraying and the effects it's having on the public, plus the psychotronic warfare, the scalar weaponry, which is also used on top of the spraying or in combination with the spraying to alter the moods and the reactions to the public.

At the post office today, I watched as a woman tried to tally up the figures for a few things that I was posting out and it came to $202, which is about 100-odd dollars just over what it should be. That's the kind of day it's been everywhere I went, and a slight confusion. When I went to the bank, as soon as I got up to the teller, down went the computers and they had to resort back to the calculators and confusion, once again, as the woman tallied up the same amount of figures and got four different answers each time. It wasn't a complicated project by any stretch of the imagination, but I watched the reactions, as I say, all day to the people around me.

Same thing when I went to the grocery store and there's this woman in front who had her usual groceries and two bags that she'd filled with dates and things and hadn't put any price on or the sticker on, and held up me who was right behind her for about 20 minutes while she had to go back and find them and get the number and the bin and all that stuff. That's the kind of day it's been; and yet, the odd thing is, I knew it was going to be one of those days before I started it. You get that little precognition there. A little bit of déjà vu and you just know what's going to happen, so each thing is no surprise to you when it does happen. Kind of like the Matrix movie when the programs overlap and there's a time lapse when you see something twice. That's kind of like the feeling you get when you have one of those days. I wouldn't be surprised if the confusion in people that we're witnessing is due to not only the inhalation of the spraying, which may be laced with drugs as well as the metallic substances that's been found, plus the HAARP playing on top of it, is having an effect on the public in ways they don't understand.

They certainly are not reacting to situations in their own environment or to the world situation as people really should be. The bank teller was mentioning that the U.S. dollar is pretty well par with the Canadian dollar; and I said to her, "It’s because we're merging you see by 2010," and she said, "That will never happen." Why would it never happen? Because in her little mind, her world, her conditioning, it could never happen. There's no foresight. There's no thought. There's no recollection of the trade agreements being signed. Nothing was there at all except her idea that that could never happen. Then her next comment was interesting, was off-handed almost absent minded when she said, "The cultures are all the same now anyway." I said that's right. We've had the same culture for years, same indoctrination, same television. We speak the same language, we do the same things, buy the same things from the stores, which are just chains, from north to south, east to west, so really it's no big deal. We've already been lined up to merge. That's the whole idea behind the big corporations and their chain stores.

As Professor Carroll Quigley said, "the new CEOs will be the feudal overlords with their international corporations," and we see that's happened. In reality, there is no competition at the top because these CEOs pop in and out of politics. They go into the big corporations. Then they move into their competitor's position. They change seats like musical chairs and you couldn't do that in the world of competition because the CEO would take their business project plans with him, the plans for the next 50 to 100 years, meaning there would be massive battles there. You'd lose all your secrets of investments and plans et cetera. Therefore, that tells you there is no competition at the top.

The big CEOs are not the capstone of the building, but they're up there at the top. They know all they need to know for their position; and that's the beauty of a pyramid. Each layer of the pyramid only needs to know what it needs to know and they're quite happy with that. In fact, to get up there, that's one of the prerequisites, knowing what questions not to ask, very important. Even the police force is the same thing, the questions not to ask. Same in the military if you want a promotion. They said that's a “good man.” That's what they call you. You're a “good man” because you don't ask the questions that a sentient person might.

This week on my Cutting Through the Matrix Show on RBN Radio, I've been touching on perception and how perception is altered and how conditioning is altered through the alteration of the immediate environment around a person. It's so clever you see. The scientists who initially try to find out how the mind would work realized there were so many facets to study, and having the unlimited budgets they get from the big think tanks and the big governmental secret organizations from the parallel government really, they decided to split up into specializations. Skinner that went into behaviorism and behavioral science thought it best to alter a person's behavior by simply altering the environment around them.

You don't realize how easy it is to condition you by slight changes over a period of time within your environment. The Pavlovian training that you got even to wear a seatbelt was quite simple. They put a buzzer in the car, therefore, when it wasn't snapped in the buzzer went on and you responded to the noise, very simple. They do this with animals in laboratories, until you have a population and a world population that obeys automatically and doesn't even think that machine is literally programming them to do something. A machine really which is in their environment and not part of them. It's around them. This same conditioning process is now going into shopping malls in Britain and shortly to come to ones near you, where big screens are installed and if you just happened to drop a candy wrapper or do something socially unacceptable, and that could vary from a whole bunch of things. They just keep expanding what is acceptable and not acceptable. You'll find yourself that you'll be on the screen and the whole shopping mall will see and you'll feel terribly small and under the microscope and blush, and may even do worse things depending on how well your bladder is equipped to handle it, but that's all to train the public by alterations in the environment to obey, obey, obey.

You've heard the battle that's been going on for many, many years concerning law enforcement. Law enforcement, you see, must by its own mandate and its own teaching go the whole way to be absolutely sure that everyone will obey. It has no choice because, when you see the way they're trained and the specialists now and the multi-specialists and the multi-layered specialisms that are into law enforcement, that is the mandate. Everyone must be predictable completely in order to control them completely. It can't go any other way. No matter what silly laws seem to come along, the public don't understand they will enforce them because these laws have nothing to do really with treating you like a human being. You're simply a guinea pig that's being trained as a good animal should be, trained by its betters, according to the law. They truly see their position as that.

It's the same in the military. The military have courses for the officers where they say the only solution to world peace is to ban war, to eliminate war. They go through all the causes of war, which are only superficial ones and again they're only told what they need to know; and that's how it's so easy to believe when you're taught all that you need to know and no more. They really believe that the elimination of nations will end war. However, none of them want to be out of work and that's why, since before you were born, really since the end of World War II, they saw the glimmering of a united planet where they'd have to find new enemies and who they'd turn their sights on. Well it's the member of Joe Public you see. There's no other target left.

A world society that will need to be trained like Pavlovian animals into new ways of behavior through traditional methods of the threat of force and eventually the use of force if need be. This is where science has taken us – science which the elite decided would conquer the world, sciences which they kept secret from the public, not just the stuff you get at university but the levels of tuition which are much higher than the university level that deal with the very advanced sciences. The stuff they get at university level is literally child's play. It's Freudian and it's low-level stuff; and then the behaviorists, too, simply repeat the same tests and routines on animals that the last class did and their previous year's class did, on and on and on. They don't realize that there are branches way above them which have crossed the line between observation and coercion or direct stimulation, because they do have equipment which, again, is out in the open now if you read the right books to do with the psychotronic warfare.

Zbigniew Brzezinski talked about this in the book "Between Two Ages." It's a must read for anyone who really wants to get into the agenda because Brzezinski wasn't some sci-fi novelist employed by the Futurist Society to simply give you predictive programming. This guy is up at the top and he gives advice to a lot of presidents, still does, and his specialty was about behavioral control of vast societies. When Brzezinski was asked if he thought the public would ever rebel if they were pushed too far, he scoffed and said the public, he says, what do you mean? You can beat them. You can push them. You can starve them to death and what do they do, meaning would they turn and rebel. He says, "No. They'd turn around and eat their dead." That's what he thinks of the general public and that's the typical of the elitist who are in charge, the psychopathic elitists.

Now he's not quite wrong in what he's saying because they've done studies down through history, down through the ages on this very thing. It takes an awful lot to get Joe Public to rebel, and even then, it's sporadic. It's a last ditch desperate attempt to sustain life, to get food, to have a roof over their head for their family. When there's no family left there's nothing left to fight for. That's another reason they want to destroy the family, because the woman, as Adolph Hitler said, will follow the biggest propagandist, the one who promises them safety and security if they just obey; and he said we must aim all our propaganda at her. She will come. The child will follow the mother and therefore it must follow the man; and he was only quoting Nero and other tyrants from the past who used the same formula. When the family is destroyed there's no man left to defend anything, so government can talk directly and demand you the individual to obey with no one stepping in between or around you to help you. That's as simple as that.

Brzezinski in the book "Between Two Ages" talked about psychotronic warfare. He said it would shortly be used on the public. You'll find that in it. "The Technetronic Era." Technicians would be one huge class that would be up there under "The Guardians" as Plato called them, working for The Guardians, the dominant minority of Aldous Huxley. Different names for the same people, same families, and they'll be using this psychotronic warfare. Psychotronics is the ability for a computer to literally pickup on the electrical impulses, which compose a language. Each one's a language going to different nerves – your eyes, your ears and different centers of the body. You can pick it up instantaneously as you broadcast it. It amplifies the signal. It can decipher it; and if they think that you’re having the wrong thoughts, they can adjust them and beam it right back at you so that you'll suddenly change your mind in the middle of something, or your opinion in the middle of something, or simply blot it out of your mind altogether. This technology actually exists.

The beauty of this system is they keep these sciences pretty well secret from the general public. You won't hear it touted about on the news. The news is meant to keep you in one phase of reality, which is the bottom level. Science magazines and exposés are meant to do the same when they come out and say, "This is the best that we have. That's all there is. We’re working on this. Maybe one day we might be able to yah-de-yah-de-yah."

That's how you're kept in the dark while they're actually using advanced technology and psychotronics on the public. This was demonstrated on Canadian television when Nick Begich somehow or other has gotten a hold of and shown using this obsolete equipment from the CIA from the 1950’s. Stuff you could put in your pocket like a packet of cigarettes. Something you could aim at someone's head and literally give them thoughts or voices or music inside their skull. Old stuff, obsolete stuff and you wonder how many people ended up having psychotic breakdowns thinking they were going mad as they were being tested with stuff on probably a world basis. I think every country has the same technology, to be honest, and has for a long time.

How many people were locked up in psychiatric hospitals with this as all the studies were going on?

There's a movie everyone should get a hold of. It's called "Control Factor." It's very similar in a sense to "They Live" in that it was a low-budget movie, but it's packed with real stuff. Real information about psychotronics written in a story form where whole cities are under the microscope and individuals within society are under another microscope, being tested and tested and tested. Because you see if something in your environment changes or within yourself it seems, you might think you're going a little crazy, and they want to study you as you think you're going crazy, as you try to hold on to sanity and all strange things are happening to you or around you. They want to be able to predict your behavior as you use your logic to try and fathom out what's happening to you. This stuff has been done on the public, and what kind of scale we'll never know, but I do believe that the HAARP technology is putting people into a much calmer state than they should be, even though when you see them in towns and cities they're very, very tense because the worries are stepping up in society. All the glue that held it together is falling apart. It's breaking off and chipping away. There's a tension there but there's something else that's keeping them under almost a foggy state or a ‘fuguish state’ as they call it in psychiatry.

Now I don't know where Nick Begich got that equipment to demonstrate on the CBC on the Wendy Mesley show. You can't find it at the Army Surplus store for camping and supplies. Nonetheless, that equipment was solid-state. It had to be micro-circuitry and that was the 1950’s.

How far ahead have they been in the past and how far are we ahead today?

They're tremendously far ahead. They're using the psychotronics on a large scale. Those who stay up at night and watch the sky when you're getting these new thunderstorms – the new norm thunderstorms. We're always getting new normals. It must be normal because the forecast never mentions it or comments on the strange bizarreness of the piano ripples that go across the sky now and strobe like effects, which are witnessed across even parts of Ontario by different people who get in touch with me. That helps to verify it's not just you who's under attack. It's a whole people who are sleeping away.

The voice-to-skull technology is very old stuff. Alexander Bell's father was working on that before Bell himself became famous with the telephone and took over. They're all very high in certain societies and they had their mandates. You'll find that intergenerational families have their own particular specialty, which they pass on to their children who take over; and no doubt, if you went into the lineages of them, you'd find them connected to very important people in history.

I don't know if people are really aware with the changes they've all heard of vaguely concerning televisions for instance and the flicker rate, the pattern and all the different names they've used for updating television to high definition and all this kind of stuff; and you think it's just for your own entertainment and pleasure and better viewing. Yet, before the television was given out, it was well known that specific flicker rates (which are not really visible to the conscious mind) can set you into epileptic seizures if need be. This has been tried in Japan in a big test that they used on children with one of the more popular games when they first brought it out. Many of them went into epileptic seizures.

This kind of technology, this kind of thing, again, a change in your environment, something external to yourself, can induce certain programmed effects because that's what it's doing. It's programming your brain because it can tap into certain frequencies that your brain will then try and match. It's a ‘sympathetic resonance’ as they call it. They can do it with any nerve in your body because all the different nerve systems and the nervous systems to your eyes, your ears and so on have different rates of vibration and so do all the nutrients that come along to it. That's how they pick up the specific nutrients they need, they increase and vibrate at the same frequency as the nerves themselves and it attracts them to it, they would take it by osmosis. Once again, old stuff, old stuff that's now being used in real life, because when they give you pop guns they call firearms they're keeping you in the dark. They're so far ahead of all of that. It's even a joke for them still to use firearms for the regular troops – keeps you still thinking old-think. That's the best we've got, even though they keep changing the style of it. It's the same old stuff, powder and ball basically, and it keeps you thinking that's the best we can do.

For a while in the 1970’s, the big magazines for the military were publishing the fact that they had little pencil-sized weapons that, if a soldier swept it across the battlefield, a little pen torch, a pen flashlight, everyone coming in his direction would be blinded permanently. That's what I'm talking about, the quiet technology, the very, very quiet technology that's had massive funding, because the world we're going into is to be a world of changes, big changes, rapid changes – so rapid that the Department of Defence published the biggest think tank that it owns, its own report in "The Guardian Newspaper," at least 9 pages of it, but there was 90 all together. Look into the archive section of my website and you'll find it there. They foresee a horror show of uprisings for the next 30 years, and this ties in with the speech given by Donald Rumsfeld right after 9/11 when he said, "This war might take a hundred years." Joe Average, between his inoculations, his modified food and his hamburgers and his GM potatoes, French fries and all the other stuff that he eats, vaguely thinks through this fugue again, this fuguish state, and might wonder occasionally here and there, one of them will think, “why will it take so long, a hundred years, to finish off the Middle East?”

It's not the Middle East, folks, it's the whole planet. It's the whole planet that must come through a dramatic change from the old world to the new world, including New Age, the age of Huxley's "Brave New World". ‘Brave new world’ was a term from the ancient Greeks, the ancient philosophers who wrote about this as well, a brave new world where you'd dare those who had the ability and the audacity, like the knights, you see. A knight is bold. He's audacious, his audacity. Those who could grab the reins of life and lead would dare to take charge and conquer nature and break all the bonds of the past. Reshape the world. Remold it into a new, better, more efficient system to serve those who dared to take the reins, the psychopathic inbred personalities that have run this world for a long, long time.

Charles Darwin did not come up with the idea of "Origin of the Species" to do with selective breeding by himself. His grandfather wrote about it because they'd already been inbreeding themselves and picking specific partners for certain qualities, always from the same other family. The idea to get hybrids out of the matches and then to inbreed the hybrids and breed them. That's what it's about, an old, old idea or science that has been used down through the ages by very powerful wealthy families.

For lower order secret societies, under the many names, those who could take the hint and marry a person they're advised to after the third generation could actually have a son down the road who would go higher and eventually perhaps get knighted and brought in to eligibility for marriage into these particular families. That's what it was all about. All the secrecy at the bottom of joining a little brotherhood to get little favors from society were just that. It's a cover for the bottom. It's just a charitable cover for the public who never see past the charity and the clowns who drive little cars in front of parades and handout balloons and make you laugh, when there's a more ominous aspect to all of it, because the brighter ones, the wise guys get to the top, the better psychopaths who look down their noses at the profane down below, including the low Masons. It's because some of the higher Masons and they're very street-wise. They see through every con automatically and laugh about it.

I remember one of them telling me, he says, “oh yeah, I believe the police are there to help us and they care about our safety when they give us plastic bumpers after taking away the metal ones.” Instant, you see, instant streetwise recognition of the fallacies that are being pushed over the public. He also knew too that it was to increase the sales of parts because these plastic things crumple like crazy; and front and rear in most accidents are simple bumps. Now it’s an awful lot more money to repair all of that, and so after-sales parts do very, very well. That's how the Masons see things. They see through the cons that are pulled over the public time and time again. They see through it so easily. These are the “wise guys.” These are the guys who have no problem in taking their “graft,” another meaning for G. There's many levels of G, but another methods of taking graft from those in the darkness, the profane, the herd, in this winner and loser society we call civilization and progress.

Getting back to the television and the changeover, I've often wondered about the alteration of things from the analogue to the digital. Digital is very interesting, when you DIG IT, you know. A phrase they used during the '60’s when all the stereo and so on was coming in big time. DIG IT, man – DIGIT man; and everyone parroted it and gave it as a greeting in fact to each other. Christians, on the other hand, and other religionists will turn to their holy books looking for answers and never fathoming that the predictive programming in their books, mainly in Christianity when it tacked on Revelations, was meant to program them to the very end and be deceived to the very end. That way they don't cause a problem. They're very conformists to the power structure. It doesn't matter how bad the structure is. They emulate it and behave like it and they like to be middle class and have clean shirts and ties and suits to wear to church and cars that don't rust, because God doesn’t like that apparently.

In fact, you might be a failure in your system if you didn't have all those new clothes and new cars. It means you're holding back a sin. They have an answer for everything. It's quite interesting. They don't need an angry God who's going to be judgmental and have all these people who primarily grab the Old Testament which had to predominate eventually over the new, because most people like laws and rules and that's what the Old Testament is full of. Therefore they judge all the time and they're also programmed that it's God's will, you can't fight God, why even complain? Because if it's God's will, it's God's agenda. They are in doublethink. They're terrified of the end. They're so terrified they might lose their own little lives individually yet they can't stop what's happening, because if they try to, then you're going against God's will. There's abuse for you.

We’ve been trained to believe that the sciences were simply being explored through the curiosity of man to find out how things worked to make all our lives better. We should have asked what they meant by “better” and who defined it. Who defined progress? Because we've gone really from one age, an age that was short lived and that was the age of the budding individual, a fairly recent phenomena from the Middle Ages. In the Middle Ages it was the mass man who was told all he needed to know. All his answers were there in the Bible. His priests were given the answers or his minister thereon and there was nothing left to question. They needed the sciences to fill in the gaps or explain anything in more detail to him. He lived in communities ruled over by lords and lairds and all kinds of subdivisions of nobility. For a short time it was a chance of individuality, fairly recently in fact, and now that's on the way out as you can see people are very gregarious today. Most of them live in the cities.

Before the Great Depression, over 90 percent of them lived on the land but the Great Depression put them off the land into the cities. This also had been happening too, mind you, since the Industrial Revolution much earlier in the European countries, but it took really the Great Depression to finish off the U.S. and get most of them into their new habitat areas where they now talk about urban sprawl and contain urban sprawl. What did you have before that? You had them all over the place. That's when they were much happier and that's where individuality began to sprout in those who were brought up in really rural, sometimes isolated areas.

Today we're treated really as complex mechanisms. We're just products, as I say, of environments and hereditary factors. Just protoplasmic mechanisms engineered by chance by genetic codes and DNA helices and work on the base mechanics of stimulus and response to adapt us to the world around us; and that's what we're told. Meanwhile, we're being adapted all the time. We're being forced to adapt in this spinning wheel, like a hamster has in a cage to run faster and faster and we can't run any faster, we're told to learn new mechanisms of coping with all the stresses. All the stresses that are there because we're not living in a humane world. That's why you have all the stresses. There's nothing normal or humane about it. That's why you have massive psychiatric industry, and the psychologists too are making a killing off the killing of the people as they breakdown then they're given Band-Aid treatment and thrown back into society, the very structure that brought them down in the first place.

The ancients talked about the opposites, called many names, Ahura-Mazda and Ahriman, the two in conflict down through the ages, for eternity. The yin and yang, the same thing, the opposites always battling along. In Christianity, it's a Christ and anti-Christ. The Anti-Christ really is a symbol of a force – a force that might even be within us, which treats the world like dead matter, assuming that everything can be weighed and measured, calculated, it leads into a sub-natural world hidden below the threshold of sense perception. The world below man really is a world of magnetism and electricity and atomic energy, DNA codes and so on. We become the observers. When you become the observer, then man has become the very means to eliminate himself from an active role in Earth's evolution. The will itself is subverted, especially the individual will, and it's enslaved because the models, the intellects, the intellects (at least those who are in charge) use and project on to us are those that information is vital for everything; and from the information, they then use data and the data gives the answer to them. Even though the data can have nothing in common with humanity itself as pure human beings with emotions and feelings and needs. This is the elimination of man from the process as I say of his own evolution.

The data itself, the facts that they gather, the supposed facts that they gather, statistics that they gather, end up giving them the answers, which are then imposed upon us as to how we must behave and work and think. Computers are becoming obeyed as though they’re gods. I've said before that Nietzsche who was one of the first ones, at least the front man, to say "God is dead," also meant that the opposite, the corroli, means that you will act differently if you think God is dead than when you think God existed. At that age of science, suddenly there was no one or really that we never saw – we saw there never was a one, a God, a deity, then we'd have to change everything that we'd ever thought, everything that was ever said and every deed that would have been done, and see it in a completely different way. You have a reversal of values where life is sacred and that all the laws therefore revolve around that one thing. If God is dead and we're just flukes in evolution from a great bang, which is just a farcical as Genesis, then we allow ourselves to be used and abused, guided, bludgeoned, cajoled, forced, euthanized to the end because we're no longer sacred you see.

You find at this time, this age, everything is to do with extremes and opposites. Politics are really two expressions of the same impulse. The impulse is to formulate and to systematize and to codify. It doesn’t matter whether it's left-wing, right-wing, they're all using the same system. That's why the Soviet system went along parallel with the west in their sciences, which were then forced upon the people, at least the peoples’ conduct had to rectify itself to do with the sciences, it had to adapt. They're just two sides of the same coin, left-wing, right-wing. That's why left-wing or right-wing parties, when they have total control, end up building empires regardless. Empires will obliterate distinctions, which are unique, peculiar to individuals. In fact, they eradicate individuality. They impose systems which can be as alien to the individual on which it is imposed as the mood of the scientists may be to the artist or poet.

Another meaning of a trinity is the world itself, earth, matter. It has intellect above it, always symbolized as the serpent, and the combination of the two creates a symbiosis of matter and intellect, always at war – the offspring being in double-think at all times, because emotion is left out of he equation, there's no spirit involved. When we capitulate this term, abused, muddied term called spirit, you have a creeping cancer of the soul. You have stagnation and dehumanization and there's a willingness you'll see throughout society to be a fractional element in a complex mechanical entity, rather than a complete being in our own human ambience. We have a passive population, a population that sits at sports together gregariously, yet still passively observing, observing, observing. At night the people go into their homes and passively watch television and get programmed. They don't participate in anything. When they discuss the topics on television, they think the ideas are their own. However, once again, that television, that external stimuli in their environment has altered what they would be doing or thinking for themselves if they didn't have that television there. Very simple.

Now it's the computer with its flashing screen (which you don't see consciously either, but your subconscious does), and you can literally burst little flashes across that screen there which can program you. The Pentagon has admitted they have particular ‘viruses’ they call them, which can stop the heart of a viewer of a computer with a certain combination flashing of lights in a certain sequence and colors. Your body and all those functions within the body that rely on electrical impulses have their own languages; and they can emulate this externally, have you see it and your mind will adopt it and put it into action, another thought of way of ‘remote control’ you might say; and we think we're buying all this stuff for our own good. I keep telling the people there's nothing given to the public unless it's for an ulterior purpose by the elite, who don't really care if you're enjoying yourself or not. It's only important that you think you're enjoying yourself. That's why they flooded everything with pornography, to make sure that the vast majority go into it, because we all have that urge don't we? Use the natural urges of a specimen and then trap the specimen in a particular area by using them.

It's interesting to watch and observe how I myself have been accepted by different, again, groups of people. People who see themselves in a pigeon-hole belonging to this or that or the other group. People who have been listening to even patriot radio for years, which has kept them on edge forever with impending disasters, yet they say that I'm too gloomy because I don't give them the good news at the end of it, which is to buy something generally after you've been terrified. I don't do that, no, because I'm beyond it. I've watched what's happening my whole life. I know how things work and I know how the minds of those who are in what they think are the patriot communities they think as well. I don't build up to a sales pitch by scaring the bejesus out of you and then selling you an antidote or something that's going to save you like a life raft. I just tell you facts as they are, and I don't expect and never did expect the vast majority to understand. Most never will. They never have in any previous generation or any previous age either. It's only for those who have will and who question things to understand the bigger picture.

The mainstream media gives us these terrorist scenarios all the time. Homeland Security has been putting our false flag alerts for the last few years now. They have to do it. They're crying wolf, wolf, wolf and everyone picks up on it and gets terrified, including the patriot radio stations, and I look beyond it. No, it's not inconceivable but there's always some thing or cause of war or whatever it may be with some other country, but you can bet your bottom dollar that it's not for the elite of either country to be annihilated. They never do that. They wouldn't be so silly. That's why they have all their agreements.

The West created communism. It financed communism from the beginning, both in Russia and in China. The different agreements that were signed in the '70’s, '80’s and '90’s to do with building up China to be the manufacturer for the planet through intense effort and cooperation between all countries and masses of lawyers and bureaucrats working together to bring it to pass. China is owned by the big corporations and the big money lenders. You would never find your own elite, never, ever giving away a power to others who may annihilate them down the road. It would never happen. Their infrastructure, their ability to mass produce weaponry, for instance, if it was just basic weaponry would never be given away to your enemies and you're left defenseless because you can't look at yourself anymore.

The elite are not stupid. They own all the supposed enemies – enemies where they keep changing their sights on every so often, like “who are we fighting today, East Asia or West Asia?” as we hopscotch around in this video game of war. Most Americans don't realize it wasn't Iraq that went to war after 9/11. It was Afghanistan and the guy who was living in caves, but the media has done such a great job, most folk don't know that anymore. They thought Saddam Hussein in Iraq was behind it, even though Mr. Bush himself said during an inquiry that Mr. Hussein had nothing to do with it; and he never said that they did have anything to do with it. He just said he was a bad man and the world was a better place without him. That was his justification. That was good enough for the public, apparently, because they didn't question it.

However, it has nothing to do with that. It's a long-term agenda, as we know. For a world society to be kept under control and go through a transitory phase, especially in the West, of using ID cards and borders until we all have ID cards and chips, then the borders are to come down just like Europe. They're down, you see. So don't think the borders are being intensified for some sort of permanency. They're not. It's just a little sham at the moment to get you used to getting your ID card, which is an international one, and that way you can track and trace wherever you go in the future. Your offspring will get born into this system and they'll think it's all quite natural to be traced and tracked and monitored, and every purchase analyzed and recorded. We're just laboratory rats in this system.

In ancient times, when the ancient mysteries came out of Egypt and Greece and moved into the Levant in different areas and gave them something that wasn't given to the public. It was always given to a select few down through the ages. They gave them for the first time the idea of ‘individual salvation’ if you like. That's how it was taken by the public, because everyone in every generation is terrified of the same thing, which is death. Always the same formula, death, you see, and being saved from it. The reason people can go through hell on earth is because death terrifies them more than the hell on earth; and that's why they put up with so much in what would seem in North America as nothing to what other countries had to in their recent and remote histories. It will become nasty though, as all energy is taken from you. All those things which you need for self-sustainability are taken from you and you're forbidden to even grow your own food eventually. You'll be antisocial if you do. That's what they're talking about, the riots that will come as this system really steamrolls ahead; and yes, it is their system. We're all trained to gather this seed called money and use it; and when they decide to pull the plug or reduce it or half its value, they will do so and bring in their next currency. In fact, they must do that to bring in the new North American currency that's scheduled. Whenever they do a changeover, they pretty well half the purchasing power of the money with the new coinage or paper or blips on screens. Whatever they want to call it, it's all the same con job.

When they decimalized the British currency, it happened pretty well overnight going from 12 old pennies to a schilling to five new pence to a shilling, and they hit the people with general sales tax at the same time. Not general sales tax actually, they called it that before, but then called it 'value added tax', so they had a double whammy. Total confusion, but in the end, everyone realized that they were getting half the value and purchasing power for the same earnings. It took a while for that to get through. That's what's always been done when they introduced a new currency.

People also sometimes complain I don't answer their emails. They don't see how many I get in a day, and I'm not sitting here with a staff of people, like others are, to take care of it all. I do my own cooking here and everything else and shopping et cetera, and I can't sit here like some machine on a machine answering every single email. Some people just use me as a reference library. They think they can phone me up and maybe I’m plumbed into the chair with water getting piped in, and perhaps septic getting piped out, just to answer little questions, where they could do their own searches and find things themselves and I'd appreciate it if they did. There are important emails I have to get back to and I can't. There's just too many and too much to do here in a day. Don't expect me to give you the answers as well. That's the first thing people do, is say “he doesn't tell us the answer”; and that's how they phrase it, “Doesn't tell us the answer.” You see, it’s a collective mentality who have been used all their lives to be told what to do, what to think, and that's not what I'm here for is to tell you what to do or what to think. The collective mentality demands a solution that is given to them. That's why they pick sides and things and vote and do all these kind of things and listen to experts. That's why we're in the mess we're in, because the battle along many different planes is also a battle of the individual versus the collective –individual sentience versus the BORG.

The BORG can't think for themselves and will get agitated if they're not told what to think or do. ‘Know thyself’ is the old adage. It means going inside yourself for solutions, not going outside to find someone who might have them ready-made. The battle is on many, many fronts, on many levels above and below. I'm just giving you the news. I'm giving you the details. I'm explaining where you are and how you got here. I have shown you a few ways of where it could go, and that would be up to yourselves. The collective will always blame the leader that doesn’t get them what they want. That's the allegory of the mob who jeered Jesus, the same mob that at one time cheered him on who jeered him in the crucifixion. That's what it means, the collective versus the individual that rises above.


China manufacturers lace children's toys with liquid ecstasy

The next time you see your infant enjoying a new made-in-China toy, you might want to check to make sure he's not having too much of a good time: A recent discovery reveals that toys called "Aqua Dots" are coated with a chemical similar to liquid ectasy. When children eat the Aqua Dots (which they're not supposed to do, but they're children, after all), they go into an ectasy-induced coma. Six children have fallen ill in Australia where the toys are marketed as Bindeez. Manufacturers and distributors of the product are pulling it off the shelves in North America and around the world. It's the latest in a long string of health scares from Mainland China's product manufacturers.

The chemical culprit of all this is 1,4-butanediol, which breaks down into gamma hydroxy butyrate, also known as the "date rape drug." This drug is obviously not supposed to be used in children's toys, but then again we're talking about manufacturers from Communist China, where it seems that anything goes as long as western retailers close their eyes and don't bother to conduct safety tests on these products. (Dog food, anyone?)

All this follows the recent, astonishing announcement by Nancy Nord of the U.S. government's Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) that there's really no need to enhance the safety monitoring of consumer products in the United States. Under orders from the White House, Nord insisted that the CPSC didn't need any increase in funding, and that businesses should essentially remain unregulated. Nancy Nord, who is now widely regarded as a pro-business Bush puppet, jetted around the world on trips paid for by some of the very same wealthy corporations who don't want consumer product safety regulations.

Not surprisingly, virtually everyone following this issue is outraged at both Nancy Nord and the Bush Administration for apparently having no concern whatsoever for the safety of U.S. consumers. But why should this surprise us? The FDA openly approves dangerous pharmaceuticals that even the agency's own top scientists admit are killing at least a hundred thousand Americans each year. What's a little ectasy in children's toys when senior citizens on medications are dropping faster than the U.S. dollar?

Corporations first, consumers last

The truth in all this is stupidly obvious: The U.S. government really has no interest in protecting consumers from corporations. Whether we're talking Big Pharma, food companies, toy manufacturers or even financial issues, virtually the entire United States government is aligned against consumers in a pro-business stance that sacrifices the lives of Americans for corporate profits. While there are minor exceptions to this, the big agencies that are supposed to protect consumers (FDA, EPA, FTC, FCC, etc.) have spent the last several years kow-towing to the interests of wealthy, influential corporations rather than protecting the interests of consumers.

Want examples? Why isn't the FTC investigating the pharmaceutical pricing monopoly engineered by Big Pharma and the FDA? Why isn't the FDA, for its part, protecting Americans from dangerous drugs like Avandia? Why does the FCC cater to the big business monopolization of the broadcast spectrum, squeezing out small, local operators who might want to run intelligent, independent radio stations? Why isn't the EPA going after Monsanto for the environmental impact of all its genetically modified crops and destructive chemicals? Why isn't the entire cancer industry going after chemical companies and actively trying to prevent cancer rather than simply claiming to be searching for a cure that will never be found anyway?

The answer to all these questions is the same: Because the U.S. government acts in collusion with Big Business to exploit U.S. consumers, stripping them of their health, their money and their future. The government has become, in essence, the enforcement branch of corporate America. Virtually every significant new law passed by Congress is structured in alignment with the wishes of America's most powerful corporations. This is no coincidence.

"Diamond v. Pearl" Student Blasts CNN (Updated With CNN Response)

Marc Ambinder

Maria Luisa, the UNLV student who asked Hillary Clinton whether she preferred "diamonds or pearls" at last night's debate wrote on her MySpace page this morning that CNN forced her to ask the frilly question instead of a pre-approved query about the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository.

"Every single question asked during the debate by the audience had to be approved by CNN," Luisa writes. "I was asked to submit questions including "lighthearted/fun" questions. I submitted more than five questions on issues important to me. I did a policy memo on Yucca Mountain a year ago and was the finalist for the Truman Scholarship. For sure, I thought I would get to ask the Yucca question that was APPROVED by CNN days in advance."

Now, Luisa is getting "swamped" with critical e-mails.

So what happened?

Writes Luisa:

"CNN ran out of time and used me to "close" the debate with the pearls/diamonds question. Seconds later this girl comes up to me and says, "you gave our school a bad reputation.' Well, I had to explain to her that every question from the audience was pre-planned and censored. That's what the media does. See, the media chose what they wanted, not what the people or audience really wanted. That's politics; that's reality. So, if you want to read about real issues important to America--and the whole world, I suggest you pick up a copy of the Economist or the New York Times or some other independent source. If you want me to explain to you how the media works, I am more than happy to do so. But do not judge me or my integrity based on that question."

Rivals to Clinton believe that the debate audience had a pro-Clinton tilt. UNLV was responsible for distributing most of the tickets.

In a separate post, Luisa provides the question she wanted to ask:

Yucca Mountain, NV is the proposed site for the country's nuclear waste repository. Despite scientific evidence that it is a vulnerable site, the federal government continues to push for the plan to move forward. The evidence relied on is unsound and the risks involved in transporting high-level radioactive waste across the country are high. What will you [Sen. Clinton] do to ensure that the best site/s is/are chosen for the storage of spent nuclear reactor fuel?

Sam Feist, the executive producer of the debate, said that the student was asked to choose another question because the candidates had already spent about ten minutes discussing Yucca Mountain.

"When her Yucca mountain question was asked, she was given the opportunity to ask another question, and my understand is that the [diamond v. pearls] questions was her other question," Feist said. "She probably was disappointed, but we spent a lot of time with a bunch of different candidates on Yucca Mountain, and we were at the end of the debate."

Greg Sargent of TPM Election Central has a CNN spoxperson giving a slightly different story..


All our leaders are chosen for us..Albert Pike, the Pope of Freemasonry in the 1800’s, said, "We always give the public their heroes. We give the heroes to every faction, every side." The people, once they hear this person saying all the right things, will give their allegiance to that person because “he or she speaks for me.” That's how we rationalize it, and we sit back and we guide it again. They say go here, go do this, do that—and we do it. We give our power to the "authorized heroes". What are we trying to keep as a system? If we look at the major revolutions which the same organizations have always been behind they would start up clubs and organizations prior to revolutions to track members in. They then observe carefully the different members as they taught and they know they're be problems after the revolution because they were too intelligent and they could convey by speech and knowledge a reality to the ordinary people and get it across and those people who could do that their names were on the list and immediately after the revolutions they were rounded up and killed because the stage was set as it always is. The chessboard was set in advance for this very thing. Are we trying to keep that which is familiar to us in our lifetime? —Because if we are, it’s a lost cause. It wasn’t our system; it’s just what we’re used to. What you’re used to now is not what they were used to 50 years ago, or 100 years ago, or 200 years ago as a system. The paradox is you have a mirror image of a reality or a truth being abused by the tyrants. It’s the old story of the opposites. You may call it a God and the Devil or the Ying and the Yang. Whatever you want to call it, it’s the same old story, that one is real, one isn’t. It’s the only way that the world is going to come out of this with any semblance of sentient thought for all or most of the population. The war that's one today is not so much a war on the masses. The masses are downloaded with everything and they question it not. The war is on the individual, the occasional thinker because it's the occasional thinker who can communicate who can affect many other people who then understand and they go running with information. That's why I don't pretend to be a patriot cheerleader for some old world order. I don't give you the Hollywood slogans or the John Wayne clichés which you've been taught to stand to attention with. I don't wave flags because flags symbolize the hyper-Masonic system under which we live. There's nothing in culture and in your system that wasn't designed and made to be so and counter-intelligence listens to all avenues of information and emulates it and gives you superstars who will say the same stuff and then will spin it off and you'll follow them because you're trained to follow what you perceive to be the superstar, the successful one. The one who's making the big bucks. He must be good if he's making the big bucks.
That's how you're trained to see it and therefore if a vagabond tells you ultimate truths you would ignore them. In fact, you wouldn’t even hear what was being said. Your ears would be closed. Yet if the big boys put out some charlatan you'll listen to every syllable they utter and swallow it all without question. We must do the unexpected. We must choose a different path and persuade others that at least to try yours or to look at it and they themselves might find a similar path but not quite identical but different nonetheless because ANY PATH WHICH IS NOT CHOSEN FOR YOU IS BETTER.
DON'T CHOOSE THE EXPECTED PATH when you're terrified of the changes which you're seeing more blatantly today come upon you. We're all walking this planet for a short time. Very few people breakthrough into the reality that exists and they never see. Very few people can breakthrough that. Some can and that's what it's always been about because it's the few who try to lift humanity up - all humanity up who have stopped the ultimate horror in all ages from occurring. The reason the deception is used today to control masses of people is because of the people who were awake in previous ages passing on knowledge. Otherwise, we'd all chipped long ago or lobotomized long ago. Completely lobotomized. It's only been the more cautious and devious way of governments way of getting around that that's lead them to create such a system of massive propaganda and indoctrination through television and media and schooling. It wouldn't be necessary except for people who passed on the knowledge and wisdom through countless centuries.
The people who could point to the king and say, "he has no clothes," and break the spell that held the masses. That's what it takes. But it takes life and when you look at people really are doing with themselves, they're doing what's authorized to be "good citizens" upstanding, upright, all those Masonic terms all these authorized things and yet they're not alive. They're not living. They’re putting time in. They're killing time really and as they kill time they're killing themselves and there's nothing more worthwhile that brings a flame alive than getting involved, keeping your cool as you do it and passing on just enough information here and there that maybe one day will light the fire in someone else when the words come back to them that you have uttered at the right time. That's how knowledge has been passed on. Otherwise, the whole planet would be watching sports and thank goodness with all the massive indoctrinations they haven't reached that stage yet.

It's always the few and they don't have to agree upon everything except not to oppose that which they're expected to oppose and tremendous changes can be made with no guarantees of a definite ending except that we get an alternative ending to the one which is planned and if it's not planned for you exactly for the children and those who are growing up.People are always saying that they want truth, but they don't really want truth. They want something which is familiar. They want a guarantee that if they come into the next step to waking up they'd be guaranteed to be able to handle it and that isn't the case. Not everyone can truly wake up. Many people can wake up to the first step which is simply understanding what's happening in the world around them and to them and where it's going and they can follow the speeches given by various people down through the last hundred years or so and it all begins to make sense to them, but that's only one level of this whole process.THE TRUTH MUST ALWAYS BE SAID. Otherwise, someone is controlling someone else. And people shouldn't be offended with differences of opinion and people should neither be dogmatic about it either because that's down to a battle of wills then, of ego.

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Rupert Murdoch Loves Hillary Clinton

Conservative Media Mogul To Host Fundraiser For Liberal N.Y. Senator

To call them a political odd couple would be a rash understatement.

Conservative media mogul Rupert Murdoch will host a fundraiser for liberal New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, the Financial Times reports.

The mating ritual of the unlikely allies has been under way for months. Clinton set political tongues to wagging last month by attending a Washington party celebrating the 10th anniversary of Fox News, the cable news channel owned by Murdoch.

The Financial Times quoted one unnamed source as describing the Clinton-Murdoch connection in this way: "They have a respectful and cordial relationship. He has respect for the work she has done on behalf of New York. I wouldn't say it was illustrative of a close ongoing relationship. It is not like they are dining out together."

The fundraiser will take place in July, the newspaper said. Clinton is the frontrunner for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, though she has not indicated whether or not she will run.

Clinton has worked hard to take the edge off her reputation as a card-carrying liberal. She has has collaborated with congressional conservatives on some peices of legislation, called for a "common ground" on abortion and cut a political figure some on the left see as decidedly un-liberal.

Clinton, who made her debut in the Senate Armed Services Committee four years ago, has never voted against any major Iraq military spending legislation. She has also taken two high-profile trips to Iraq – journeys that may have helped to strengthen the credentials of a senator with no military background or experience.

Clinton, who says she’s "always been a praying person," has moved into the territory John Edwards had hoped to claim as the moderate Democrat who cares about the average American.

Sunday, November 11, 2007

Weather Channel Founder: Global Warming Greatest Scam in History'

Newsbusters | November 9, 2007
Noel Sheppard

If the founder of The Weather Channel spoke out strongly against the manmade global warming myth, might media members notice?

We're going to find out the answer to that question soon, for John Coleman wrote an article published at ICECAP Wednesday that should certainly garner attention from press members -- assuming journalism hasn't been completely replaced by propagandist activism, that is.

Coleman marvelously began (emphasis added, h/t NB reader coffee250):

It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM. Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data to create in [sic] allusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental whacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the "research" to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus.

Environmental extremists, notable politicians among them, then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild "scientific" scenario of the civilization threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda. Now their ridiculous manipulated science has been accepted as fact and become a cornerstone issue for CNN, CBS, NBC, the Democratic Political Party, the Governor of California, school teachers and, in many cases, well informed but very gullible environmental conscientious citizens. Only one reporter at ABC has been allowed to counter the Global Warming frenzy with one 15 minutes documentary segment.


I have read dozens of scientific papers. I have talked with numerous scientists. I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct. There is no run away climate change. The impact of humans on climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril. I am incensed by the incredible media glamour, the politically correct silliness and rude dismissal of counter arguments by the high priest of Global Warming.

In time, a decade or two, the outrageous scam will be obvious.

Let's hope so, John; let's hope so.

Saturday, November 10, 2007

The prison industry in the United States: big business or a new form of slavery?

The prison industry in the United States: big business or a new form of slavery?

BY VICKY PELAEZ (Taken from El Diario-La Prensa, New York)

HUMAN rights organizations, as well as political and social ones, are condemning what they are calling a new form of inhumane exploitation in the United States, where they say a prison population of up to 2 million – mostly Black and Hispanic – are working for various industries for a pittance. For the tycoons who have invested in the prison industry, it has been like finding a pot of gold. They don’t have to worry about strikes or paying unemployment insurance, vacations or comp time. All of their workers are full-time, and never arrive late or are absent because of family problems; moreover, if they don’t like the pay of 25 cents an hour and refuse to work, they are locked up in isolation cells.

There are approximately 2 million inmates in state, federal and private prisons throughout the country. According to California Prison Focus, "no other society in human history has imprisoned so many of its own citizens." The figures show that the United States has locked up more people than any other country: a half million more than China, which has a population five times greater than the U.S. Statistics reveal that the United States holds 25% of the world’s prison population, but only 5% of the world’s people. From less than 300,000 inmates in 1972, the jail population grew to 2 million by the year 2000. In 1990 it was one million. Ten years ago there were only five private prisons in the country, with a population of 2,000 inmates; now, there are 100, with 62,000 inmates. It is expected that by the coming decade, the number will hit 360,000, according to reports.

What has happened over the last 10 years? Why are there so many prisoners?

"The private contracting of prisoners for work fosters incentives to lock people up. Prisons depend on this income. Corporate stockholders who make money off prisoners’ work lobby for longer sentences, in order to expand their workforce. The system feeds itself," says a study by the Progressive Labor Party, which accuses the prison industry of being "an imitation of Nazi Germany with respect to forced slave labor and concentration camps."

The prison industry complex is one of the fastest-growing industries in the United States and its investors are on Wall Street. "This multimillion-dollar industry has its own trade exhibitions, conventions, websites, and mail-order/Internet catalogs. It also has direct advertising campaigns, architecture companies, construction companies, investment houses on Wall Street, plumbing supply companies, food supply companies, armed security, and padded cells in a large variety of colors."

According to the Left Business Observer, the federal prison industry produces 100% of all military helmets, ammunition belts, bullet-proof vests, ID tags, shirts, pants, tents, bags, and canteens. Along with war supplies, prison workers supply 98% of the entire market for equipment assembly services; 93% of paints and paintbrushes; 92% of stove assembly; 46% of body armor; 36% of home appliances; 30% of headphones/microphones/speakers; and 21% of office furniture. Airplane parts, medical supplies, and much more: prisoners are even raising seeing-eye dogs for blind people.


According to reports by human rights organizations, these are the factors that increase the profit potential for those who invest in the prison industry complex:

• Jailing persons convicted of non-violent crimes, and long prison sentences for possession of microscopic quantities of illegal drugs. Federal law stipulates five years’ imprisonment without possibility of parole for possession of 5 grams of crack or 3.5 ounces of heroin, and 10 years for possession of less than 2 ounces of rock-cocaine or crack. A sentence of 5 years for cocaine powder requires possession of 500 grams – 100 times more than the quantity of rock cocaine for the same sentence. Most of those who use cocaine powder are white, middle-class or rich people, while mostly Blacks and Latinos use rock cocaine. In Texas, a person may be sentenced for up to two years’ imprisonment for possessing 4 ounces of marijuana. Here in New York, the 1973 Nelson Rockefeller anti-drug law provides for a mandatory prison sentence of 15 years to life for possession of 4 ounces of any illegal drug.

• The passage in 13 states of the "three strikes" laws (life in prison after being convicted of three felonies), made it necessary to build 20 new federal prisons. One of the most disturbing cases resulting from this measure was that of a prisoner who for stealing a car and two bicycles received three 25-year sentences.
• Longer sentences.
• The passage of laws that require minimum sentencing, without regard for circumstances.
• A large expansion of work by prisoners creating profits that motivate the incarceration of more people for longer periods of time.
• More punishment of prisoners, so as to lengthen their sentences.


Prison labor has its roots in slavery. After the 1861-1865 Civil War, a system of "hiring out prisoners" was introduced in order to continue the slavery tradition. Freed slaves were charged with not carrying out their sharecropping commitments (cultivating someone else’s land in exchange for part of the harvest) or petty thievery – which were almost never proven – and were then "hired out" for cotton picking, working in mines and building railroads. From 1870 until 1910 in the state of Georgia, 88% of hired-out convicts were Black. In Alabama, 93% of "hired-out" miners were Black. In Mississippi, a huge prison farm similar to the old slave plantations replaced the system of hiring out convicts. The notorious Parchman plantation existed until 1972.

During the post-Civil War period, Jim Crow racial segregation laws were imposed on every state, with legal segregation in schools, housing, marriages and many other aspects of daily life. "Today, a new set of markedly racist laws is imposing slave labor and sweatshops on the criminal justice system, now known as the prison industry complex," comments the Left Business Observer.

Who is investing? At least 37 states have legalized the contracting of prison labor by private corporations that mount their operations inside state prisons. The list of such companies contains the cream of U.S. corporate society: IBM, Boeing, Motorola, Microsoft, AT&T, Wireless, Texas Instrument, Dell, Compaq, Honeywell, Hewlett-Packard, Nortel, Lucent Technologies, 3Com, Intel, Northern Telecom, TWA, Nordstrom’s, Revlon, Macy's, Pierre Cardin, Target Stores, and many more. All of these businesses are excited about the economic boom generation by prison labor. Just between 1980 and 1994, profits went up from $392 million to $1.31 billion. Inmates in state penitentiaries generally receive the minimum wage for their work, but not all; in Colorado, they get about $2 per hour, well under the minimum. And in privately-run prisons, they receive as little as 17 cents per hour for a maximum of six hours a day, the equivalent of $20 per month. The highest-paying private prison is CCA in Tennessee, where prisoners receive 50 cents per hour for what they call "highly skilled positions." At those rates, it is no surprise that inmates find the pay in federal prisons to be very generous. There, they can earn $1.25 an hour and work eight hours a day, and sometimes overtime. They can send home $200-$300 per month.
Thanks to prison labor, the United States is once again an attractive location for investment in work that was designed for Third World labor markets. A company that operated a maquiladora (assembly plant in Mexico near the border) closed down its operations there and relocated to San Quentin State Prison in California. In Texas, a factory fired its 150 workers and contracted the services of prisoner-workers from the private Lockhart Texas prison, where circuit boards are assembled for companies like IBM and Compaq.
Oregon State Representative Kevin Mannix recently urged Nike to cut its production in Indonesia and bring it to his state, telling the shoe manufacturer that "there won’t be any transportation costs; we’re offering you competitive prison labor (here)."


The prison privatization boom began in the 1980s, under the governments of Ronald Reagan and Bush Sr., but reached its height in 1990 under William Clinton, when Wall Street stocks were selling like hotcakes. Clinton’s program for cutting the cutting the federal workforce resulted in the Justice Departments contracting of private prison corporations for the incarceration of undocumented workers and high-security inmates.

Private prisons are the biggest business in the prison industry complex. About 18 corporations guard 10,000 prisoners in 27 states. The two largest are Correctional Corporation of America (CCA) and Wackenhut, which together control 75%. Private prisons receive a guaranteed amount of money for each prisoner, independent of what it costs to maintain each one. According to Russell Boraas, a private prison administrator in Virginia, "the secret to low operating costs is having a minimal number of guards for the maximum number of prisoners." The CCA has an ultra-modern prison in Lawrenceville, Virginia, where five guards on dayshift and two at night watch over 750 prisoners. In these prisons, inmates may get their sentences reduced for "good behavior," but for any infraction, they get 30 days added – which means more profits for CCA. According to a study of New Mexico prisons, it was found that CCA inmates lost "good behavior time" at a rate eight times higher than those in state prisons.


Profits are so good that now there is a new business: importing inmates with long sentences, meaning the worst criminals. When a federal judge ruled that overcrowding in Texas prisons was cruel and unusual punishment, the CCA signed contracts with sheriffs in poor counties to build and run new jails and share the profits. According to a December 1998 Atlantic Monthly magazine article, this program was backed by investors from Merrill-Lynch, Shearson-Lehman, American Express and Allstate, and the operation was scattered all over rural Texas. That state’s governor, Ann Richards, followed the example of Mario Cuomo in New York and built so many state prisons that the market became flooded, cutting into private prison profits.

After a law signed by Clinton in 1996 – ending court supervision and decisions – caused overcrowding and violent, unsafe conditions in federal prisons, private prison corporations in Texas began to contact other states whose prisons were overcrowded, offering "rent-a-cell" services in the CCA prisons located in small towns in Texas. The commission for a rent-a-cell salesman is $2.50 to $5.50 per day per bed. The county gets $1.50 for each prisoner.


Ninety-seven percent of 125,000 federal inmates have been convicted of non-violent crimes. It is believed that more than half of the 623,000 inmates in municipal or county jails are innocent of the crimes they are accused of. Of these, the majority are awaiting trial. Two-thirds of the one million state prisoners have committed non-violent offenses. Sixteen percent of the country’s 2 million prisoners suffer from mental illness.