Thursday, June 28, 2007

Gender Manipulation = Civilian Control

Nancy Levant
June 26, 2007

This topic deserves the deepest introspection by every person of every age and gender. At the core of our being, we are first and foremost male or female. To the anomaly of those born with male and female genitalia or other biological variations, it is my understanding that these people sense their true gender at a very early age. Again, our first and core identities as human beings are as males or females.

Throughout documented human history, cultures and societal norms have preyed upon our genders. And to this day, males and females continue to be told who they are, what they are to do, how they are to act and feel, and what roles they are to assume as males and females – with the basis of these cultural decisions resting upon two primary factors, which are childbearing and defense.

All religions have also defined the roles of males and females, and they still do. In today’s world, we are told to accept many, many gender masters. The women’s (depopulation) movement, social scientists, public and private education, the gay movement, global multi-culturalism, geneticists, the military, and, of course, politicians but to name a few - it would be fair to say that our genders have become sources of intriguing interest to just about everyone with grant dollars to spend.

Now, what’s interesting to consider about this exploding fascination with gender is that all grant-based projects come with governmental agendas attached – ALL grant-based projects. And in today’s world, grant-based projects partner with other grant-based projects – all sharing information, and all reporting their project results and data to their grantors - the government. But what is more compelling for our consideration is the present-day fervor - the full-blown commands by our grant-funded cultural organizations and lobbyists – that we MUST believe and do as they command in regards to our gender identities, beliefs, opinions, and actions. You would think, as males and females, we are idiots – even at the core of our beings.

However, and again and again, we see there is nothing new in human history. Elites bully and command commoners, but what is new, unique, and highly intriguing is that human DNA is now a plaything for grant-funded sciences. Equally, I recently read that flowers are the “perfect” genetic hermaphrodites. This made me really, really nervous. But here is what makes me even more nervous. Just as children have been incrementally and strategically dumbed down, the two genders have also and incrementally been dumbed down. For example, consider your grandparents and great-grandparents.

In those days, men could fix (and build) cars, lawn mowers, tractors, boat engines, toasters, leaking faucets and spigots. They could fix broken septic systems and toilets, electrical problems, and cracked cement. They could fix furnaces of every kind, and they could build just about anything from houses and barns to tree houses to furniture to patios. They could wire anything. They could make and install windows and doors. They could fix tires, bicycles, motorbikes, and scooters. They could plant crops, design and plant vegetable gardens. They could hunt and fish and provide food, and they did. Most felt responsible for their families and provided for them.

Women knew how to cook. They knew how to set tables. They knew how to can. They knew how to make clothes, to crochet, knit, quilt, make curtains, lace, rugs, and how to re-cover furniture. They knew what was wrong with their children without having to run to pediatricians for rashes and runny noses. They knew how to treat injuries and contusions without having to run to emergency rooms or clinics. They knew how and what kind of medicines to give to children, and they kept medicines on hand. They could diagnose and treat all ordinary childhood illnesses. They knew how to bake, how to cook nutritionally balanced meals without food pyramids or microwave ovens, and they didn’t need Martha Stewart or any other televised billionaire to tell them how to bake the beans or fold sheets.

Women knew how to save for rainy days, and they did. They knew how to keep pantries, and they knew what was needed for rainy days. They knew not to waste money – ever - and most didn’t. And women didn’t find or lift self-esteem with tanning booths, bleached teeth, make-up, day spas, workout routines and trainers, plastic surgery, interior decorators, designer clothing, chronic diets, body fat tabulations, and all the other media-implanted behaviors that damage females. Women didn’t take anti-depressants because their friends did or because tell-a-vision told them to get high. Women didn’t need magazines to tell them how to look and cook and feel.

Granted, in those days many American men and women modeled their gender roles from Biblical teachings, but equally they were chock-full of practical knowledge, skills, and talents. They made homes vs. having them delivered by interior decorators, landscapers, and a whole multitude of hired laborers. And most men and women didn’t have a problem with their roles or definitions as men and women. But in today’s grant-funded world, all men and women have a big problem with their gender roles because they have been commanded to believe they have big gender problems. Equally they have been commanded to distrust each other. I’m afraid our grand parents would think we had lost our minds. The question is – did we?

So much has gone into the re-creation of the roles of Westernized men and women that one hardly knows where to begin. But with all things strategically global, let us begin with the intent to eliminate the Christian religion, which is the basis of unalienable rights. The Christian religion suggests marriage and fruitfulness. Politicians, lobbyists, social scientists, and think tankers demand otherwise because they want far, far fewer of us to “manage.” Therefore, marriage has been discouraged and insulted, and reproduction has been chemically altered and limited while children have been aborted to the tune of hundreds of millions - globally – all this while reproductive licenses are “being considered,” and in other countries, reproduction is force-limited by law. Depopulation of the commoner is a very serious political business and intent of the world’s elite. When in doubt, consider Africa, AIDS, and uninterrupted genocide. Also consider the pathology of billionaire elites disallowing reproductive freedom for mankind – the billionaire elite who comprise maybe 1% of mankind. Should “they” be screened for mental illness?

The degeneration of male skills is monumental and terrifically frightening. Until about 100 years ago, men throughout human history provided food and defense for females, infants and children, and tribes. They were the builders and architects of all the world’s civilizations. The skills that men acquired throughout human history are beyond comprehension. Men were, in fact, master builders. If you look at the changes, discoveries, and scientific advances – specifically in the last 200 years – you realize that males are, in fact, remarkably brilliant creatures. When you consider the world’s castles, cathedrals, ships, factories, and homes in each and every city in the entire world; and in the contemporary world the electrical, plumbing, public water supplies, and coordination of modern services, you look at the genius of the male gender.

Today’s man, however, is a far cry from the master builder of human history. He is largely unskilled, incompetent; computer, television, and sports addicted, unhappy, probably divorced once or twice, and, I believe, at the core of his manhood, miserable. I think men, and particularly American men, feel emasculated and suffer beneath the unbearable weight of very purposeful cultural emasculation and dumbing down.

Westernized women, in my opinion, have fared even worse. Women have yet to have lived in place or century that hasn’t dictated their every opinion and role. Some of the largest lobbies in Washington D.C., in all 50 states, and in our global governing bodies, have enforced contemporary society’s beliefs for today’s female. She is to be an obedient consumer, too thin, to maintain youthful looks at all costs, to let others raise her children, and she is to work outside of the home. If she becomes unhappy, she is to take anti-depressants. She is to live on birth control during her reproductive years, and she is to believe and follow every tenant of the feminist doctrine. She is to blindly submit her children to public schools, to psycho/social screenings, to mandated drugging, AND she is to submit her children to any and all vaccine regimens – including those introduced and sponsored by politicians who sponsor Big Pharma who sponsor politicians.

Under such direction, she has become shallow, self-centered, untalented, pathologically vain, unhealthy, insecure, angry, and addicted to shopping. She has lost her ability to raise and nurture children, and she has lost her respect of men through the powers of political and media suggestion.

All gender skills and talents throughout human history lost and gone to Westernized males and females have served to grow the power of contemporary government, and the condition of our children and school systems are proof positive. Frankly, we don’t know who we are allowed to be without governmental instruction, grant-based direction, and cultural rule books. Over and over again, why do we allow elites to define us and to manipulate and rule our opinions – even to the point of our biology?

In today’s global culture, the reason is clear. Women are to quit giving birth, and men are to become incapable of defending against tyranny. Our only function is to work, as directed, for the forthcoming world monarchy. We are to be micromanaged biometric laborers. Perhaps, one day, we will remember who we once were and the talents we once possessed, or perhaps we prefer nanotechnology micromanagement. Perhaps the only way for total civilian management to be achieved is when human biology is culturally corrupted to the point of “mental illness.” Perhaps total civilian management has already occurred.

Remember the politically invented and implanted “generation gap,” where we were told to believe our parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents were idiots? Think about it. There is a reason why we have been reduced to an incompetent labor force. And first and foremost, we are expected not to THINK. I offer the book The Cultural Devastation of American Women as a good place to start thinking.

Report: Pentagon Can't Account For $19 Billion Spent On Iraqi Forces

Washington Post | June 28, 2007
Ann Scott Tyson

The United States has invested $19 billion to train and equip nearly 350,000 Iraqi soldiers and police since toppling Saddam Hussein, but the ability of those forces to provide security remains in doubt, according to the findings of a bipartisan congressional investigation to be released today.

As a result, President Bush's pledge to have U.S. troops "stand down" as Iraqi forces "stand up" remains unfulfilled. Instead, U.S. troop numbers and operations have escalated in recent months, and the overall level of violence has not decreased.

Despite the substantial number of Iraqi security forces and their increasing willingness to fight -- demonstrated by rising numbers of casualties -- their progress toward taking full responsibility for the nation's security remains mixed, according to a report on the investigation by the oversight panel of the House Armed Services Committee. U.S. commanders now predict that it will take years and tens of thousands more Iraqi soldiers and police to achieve that goal.

The Pentagon "cannot report in detail how many of the 346,500 Iraqi military and police personnel that the coalition trained are operational today," according to the 250-page report. Details of the document were provided to The Washington Post by congressional staff members.

"We have no idea what our $19 billion has gotten us," said Rep. Martin T. Meehan (D-Mass.), chairman of the Armed Services subcommittee on oversight and investigations, noting that the United States investment represents $55,000 per Iraqi recruit.

"The DOD can't tell us how well the Iraqis perform their missions or even plan them," he said in an interview. "The police are in particularly bad shape, although they are critical to counterinsurgency."

The lack of transparency is especially worrisome, the report said, because of the possibility that Iraqi forces trained and equipped by the United States have joined the insurgency or sectarian militias.

"This report details the complete lack of understanding of who we have trained and what happens to them after we train them," Meehan said. "Many of the forces we have trained are unaccounted for, and others are on the rolls but haven't been vetted," he said, adding that forces "could actually be fighting against us."

The subcommittee's report found "strong evidence" that some Iraqi forces trained by the U.S.-led military coalition are involved in sectarian violence and other illegal activities. In addition, the Pentagon "cannot account for whether coalition-issued weapons have been stolen or turned against U.S. forces," the report said.

The $19 billion in appropriations -- about $5 billion each fiscal year since 2004 -- has primarily gone toward recruiting, training and equipping Iraqi security forces but also includes funding for building training centers, managing logistics and creating an Iraqi leadership structure in the ministries of defense and the interior.

The report criticized as "premature and ill-advised" the U.S. decision to transfer responsibility for vetting the Iraqi police to the national government early this year, after only a year of focused effort in generating police forces, saying that police remain ineffective and their organization is "riddled with corruption and sectarian influence." Tens of thousands of police have been hired outside of the U.S.-led training program, it said.

Regarding the Iraqi army, the report found that the Pentagon lacks clear measures of the number of soldiers on the job and their ability to conduct operations, particularly away from their home bases.

The Iraqi ministries of defense and the interior are incapable of "accounting for, supporting, or fully controlling their forces in the field," or even executing their own budgets, the investigation found. In addition, the ministries lack critical intelligence and logistics systems that would help in planning independent operations.

U.S. military advisory teams placed with Iraqi security forces were formed on an ad hoc basis and were not fully qualified for their mission in 2004 and 2005, it found. U.S. military police units were not deployed to advise the Iraqi police until 2005, and they did not begin to receive training specific to the mission until March 2007, it said. The report recommends that the Pentagon create incentives to attract the most qualified personnel for the teams.

The report includes 60 findings and 40 recommendations, many of which call for Congress to pass legislation this year mandating that the Pentagon track and provide to lawmakers a wide range of measures intended to better gauge the effectiveness of Iraqi security forces.

Since May, for example, Congress has gained access to the U.S. military's progress reports on Iraqi units, known as "transition readiness assessments." But the investigation found that the assessments still focus on the number of forces trained and equipped rather than on how well they conduct operations.

Fairness Doctrine About As Fair as Patriot Act is Patriotic

Cheaters Don't Like The Score, So They Try To Change The Rules
Prison Planet | June 28, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson
The Fairness Doctrine is about as fair as the Patriot Act is patriotic. Its supporters are fooled by this veneer of rosy lexicon while overlooking the basic fact that this is about government regulation and suffocation of independent media.

John Kerry, Dianne Feinstein (pictured), Dick Durbin and Nancy Pelosi have all called for the reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine over the past week.

Liberals clamor for a reinstitution of the Fairness Doctrine because they believe it will reign in Fox News and talk radio kingpins like Rush Limbaugh, but the fact is that Rupert Murdoch holds fundraisers for Hillary Clinton - the establishment media are intimately intertwined with the apex of both political parties. Fox News will not be targeted, this will only be used as a tool to shut down bloggers and other independent media that don't drink either the Republican or Democrat kool-aid.

Enforcement by law that broadcasters afford "equal time" to the opposing view spells the end for advocacy journalism and calls time on two of the most popular newsmen in recent years from different sides of the political spectrum, Lou Dobbs and Keith Olbermann.

The very article you are now reading will be a criminal violation of the Fairness Doctrine should it return.

Why are the political elite attempting to revive this Frankenstein despite the fact that it was thrown out after being judged unconstitutional 20 years ago? The establishment is furious that the influence of the dominant media is beginning to wane and is being diluted by grassroots independent media and the Internet.

They are seething at the fact that every new assault on our freedom that they try to wrap in glossy propaganda is being exposed and opposed with viral activism organized as a result of independent media.

This isn't about censoring the right-wing, it's about putting the structure in place to make any criticism of government illegal save jumping through 200 flaming hoops. This is about regulation of the Internet in alliance with new proposals to impose Chinese-style controls on free speech.

They are losing the debate on every issue from the amnesty bill to the centralization of power and the North American Union.

At this late stage in the game, they don't like the score so they are attempting to change the rules by re-defining freedom of speech altogether.

Wednesday, June 27, 2007


Does Facebook Have Links To The CIA?

Facebook - the CIA conspiracy

Matt Greenop
New Zealand Herald
Wednesday Aug 15, 2007

Facebook has 20 million users worldwide, is worth billions of dollars and, if internet sources are to be believed, was started by the CIA.

The social networking phenomenon started as a way of American college students to keep in touch. It is rapidly catching up with MySpace, and has left others like Bebo in its wake.

But there is a dark side to the success story that's been spreading across the blogosphere. A complex but riveting Big Brother-type conspiracy theory which links Facebook to the CIA and the US Department of Defence.

The CIA is, though, using a Facebook group to recruit staff for its very sexy sounding National Clandestine Service.

Checking out the job ads
does require a Facebook login, so if you haven't joined the site - or are worried that CIA spooks will start following you home from work -check them out on the agency's own site.

The story starts once Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg had launched, after the dorm room drama that's led to the current court case.

Facebook's first round of venture capital funding ($US500,000) came from former Paypal CEO Peter Thiel. Author of anti-multicultural tome 'The Diversity Myth', he is also on the board of radical conservative group VanguardPAC.

The second round of funding into Facebook ($US12.7 million) came from venture capital firm Accel Partners. Its manager James Breyer was formerly chairman of the National Venture Capital Association, and served on the board with Gilman Louie, CEO of In-Q-Tel, a venture capital firm established by the Central Intelligence Agency in 1999. One of the company's key areas of expertise are in "data mining technologies".

Breyer also served on the board of R&D firm BBN Technologies, which was one of those companies responsible for the rise of the internet.

Dr Anita Jones joined the firm, which included Gilman Louie. She had also served on the In-Q-Tel's board, and had been director of Defence Research and Engineering for the US Department of Defence.

She was also an adviser to the Secretary of Defence and overseeing the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which is responsible for high-tech, high-end development.

It was when a journalist lifted the lid on the DARPA's
Information Awareness Office
that the public began to show concern at its information mining projects.

Wikipedia's IAO page says: "the IAO has the stated mission to gather as much information as possible about everyone, in a centralised location, for easy perusal by the United States government, including (though not limited to) internet activity, credit card purchase histories, airline ticket purchases, car rentals, medical records, educational transcripts, driver's licenses, utility bills, tax returns, and any other available data.".

Not surprisingly, the backlash from civil libertarians led to a Congressional investigation into DARPA's activity, the Information Awareness Office lost its funding.

Now the internet conspiracy theorists are citing Facebook as the IAO's new mask.

Parts of the IAO's technology round-up included 'human network analysis and behaviour model building engines', which Facebook's massive volume of neatly-targeted data gathering allows for.

Facebook's own Terms of use state: "by posting Member Content to any part of the Web site, you automatically grant, and you represent and warrant that you have the right to grant, to facebook an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, fully paid, worldwide license to use, copy, perform, display, reformat, translate, excerpt and distribute such information and content and to prepare derivative works of, or incorpoate into other works, such information and content, and to grant and authorise sublicenses of the foregoing.

And in its equally interesting privacy policy: "Facebook may also collect information about you from other sources, such as newspapers, blogs, instant messaging services, and other users of the Facebook service through the operation of the service (eg. photo tags) in order to provide you with more useful information and a more personalised experience. By using Facebook, you are consenting to have your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States."

Is the CIA really providing the impetus and the funding behind the monster growth of this year's biggest dot com success story? Maybe only the men with the nice suits and ear pieces can answer that.

Jehovah's Witnesses exposed

A candid look at what the Watchtower Society, also known as Jehovah's Witnesses, is really about.

Was Charles Taze Russell a Mason?
An examination of some of the publications of Charles T. Russell, the founder of the Jehovah's Witnesses, would indicate that he had ties with the Masons. He used Masonic symbols. The Watchtower drawing that graced early publications right up to a couple of decades ago was pure Masonic. Russell was buried under a cross and a crown, again Masonic. Other Masonic symbols were used frequently on his publications.
We keep getting speculative articles in our mail and e-mail indicating that Russell was a Mason. Missing is the proof - where are the records of this membership if he indeed was one?
Over the past twenty-two years we have resisted jumping on the "Masonic Russell" bandwagon, awaiting something definite. Well, we feel we have finally found something which should settle the issue once and for all.
We are indebted to the extensive information found on Randall Watters website ( which included a Special 1913 Convention Report of the Internal Bible Students. Under the subject of "The Temple of Gods" is a discourse by Pastor Russell reported verbatim on pages 120-127. Russell's own comments on this very speculation once and for all. Was he a Mason?
It is evident he was familiar with the Masons. In the beginning of the discourse he point out how he is "more" than many of the groups, Masons included. These first set of quotes are all found on page 120.
"Do our Masonic friends understand something about the Temple, and being Knights Templars and so on? We more." He goes on to say that Masons and other have.. "that little bit of truth".
Russell admits ".. we remember we had very similar ideas, and not very long ago; but, without finding any fault with anybody, we are glad that we are coming to see a more reasonable and harmonious way.. "
He next moves on to points where he agrees with the Masons. A very careful reading is needed here, because if one or two sentences are taken out of context it would indeed appear that Russell was a Mason. Notice that he refers to Mason as "them" and "they", excluding himself and the brethren.
"I am very glad to have this particular opportunity of saying a word about some of the things in which we agree with our Masonic friends, because we are speaking in a building dedicated to Masonry and we also are Masons. I am a Free Mason. I am a free and accepted Mason, if I may carry the matter to its full length, because that is what our Masonic brethren like to tell us, that they are free and accepted Masons. That is their style of putting it. Now I am a free and accepted Mason. I trust we all are. But not after the style of our Masonic brethren. We have no quarrel with them. I am not going to say a word against Masons, and I can appreciate that there are certain very precious truths that are held in part by our Masonic friends. I have talked to them at times, and they have said, How do you know about all these things? We thought nobody knew anything about these things except those who had access to our highest logic."
So, Russell did say "Now I am a free and accepted Mason" but, in context it is obvious he was not, because he included all his brethren in the faith as being "Masons" as well. He also said they were all Masons, but "not after the style of our Masonic brethren."
Russell went on to place himself above the Masons because he felt he had more "secrets" than they did, his coming from the Lord himself!
"I said that I had been in conference with the Great Master Workman, the Lord himself, and I have secret information through the Holy Spirit and guidance in respect to what the Bible says, and that contains all the truth, I believe on every subject. And so if we talk to our Masonic friends about the Temple and its meaning, and about being good Masons, and about the Great Pyramid, which is the very emblem they use, and what the Great Pyramid signifies, our Masonic friends are astonished.. We are going to discuss free and accepted Masonry.. the Bible Masonry, my dear friends."
So, it is evident that while Russell tells all listeners to this discourse that he and they are all "Masons", it is obvious that he has his own meaning for the term, which he calls "Bible Masonry". As we go on, it is evident he feels he has transcended masonry's secrets and added a few of his own. [ 1913 Convention Report]
By page 121, which we will now consider, he parts company with Masonic theology, which does not recognize Jesus Christ as their head. Russell says, "..for you know the Head of the Pyramid is a perfect pyramid itself, and all the stones under that simply come into line with the top stone; and that top stone is what the Bible declares Jesus is - the chief corner-stone."
I hate to point out obvious errors in construction, but a "cornerstone" is the foundation of the building, not the peak stone at the top! Our faith rests on the chief cornerstone Jesus Christ, He doesn't sit attop our faith (shaped like a pyramid)!
Russell mixes up the Temple with the Pyramid theology he held, and then compares his organization's temple to the Masonic one.
"The Temple will not be completed until every living stone is there. And then what? The next thing will be that which our Masonic friends make so much of, and which we make so much of namely: the glorification of the temple. That is a grand thing in Masonry. They picture how Solomon the wise, the type of Jesus - offered the sacrifice, and how God accepted it, and the glory of the Lord came into the Temple. Just so our Temple, the Church in glory, will not be the Temple of God until the Heavenly Father himself shall have recognized it." [Also found on much early WT material sun god Ra on Queens, NY Assemby Hall ]
Russell later went on to claim that Jehovah God did indeed recognize himself and himself his little band of followers as the true Temple, and they alone, in all the earth were pleasing to the Father. How is this possible when he was steeped in pyramidology and Masonic "sec-rets" which he accepted? It boggles the mind to imagine God choosing one steeped in occult and pagan doctrines.
Russell now goes on to compare the heavenly reign of himself and his followers, the "Royal Priesthood" (who he says will be divine) to the Knights Templar of the Masonic Templar of the Masonic Lodge! (The order with the most occult symbols). ".. A thousand years during which these Knights Templar are to scatter blessings to all the families of the earth."
Heresy aside, he just loved to use Masonic terms and show how he and his followers were superior "Masons", superior "Knights Templar". He then offers full freedom of choice to his followers in these words, ".. If you feel that you want to become a member of the Free and Accepted Order of Masonry, and do not feel free and Masonic enough as a follower of Christ, God bless you, use your own judgment; that is yours to decide not mine. But now I am talking about this great order of masonry of which Jesus is the Grand Master. This Order is to be entered in a peculiar way. There are certain conditions - the low gate, the narrow way, the difficult path".
Now comes his most telling statement on the subject of whether or not he was a Mason.
"Although I have never been a Mason, I have heard that in Masonry they have something which very closely illustrates all of this".
So, by Russell's own words, minus the "double-speak" and the parallels he draws all through this discourse, he plainly says he has never been a Mason.
He gives the Masons their due, however, when he says, "Our Masonic friends have it down very fine. I do not know where they got it so well. I have often wondered where they found out so many of the secrets of our High and Accepted Order of Masonry. From the time you come in to be a member of the Royal Priesthood, a living stone, a member of the craft of Masonry, from the Lord's standpoint,.. if any man will be a living stone in the Temple, if any man will be a member of his High, Free and Accepted Masonry - let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me."
I can hear the gasps from modern Jehovah's Witnesses that their exalted leader used the word "cross", but this was before "new light" on the "torture stake", so I guess he's excused for ignorance.
So, although Russell claimed to know Masonic Secrets, and compared his "Royal Priesthood in Christ" to the Lodge, he felt himself above ordinary Masons, and in fact said plainly he never was one.
Nevertheless, his massive ego, just led him on and on to make more and more ridiculous statements. We continue on with remarks from page 122, "Do you mean that the Lord's Church is a secret order? Yes, surely it is .. Did the world know the great Mason when he was here? No. Did the world slay the great Master Mason? Yes."
So now we have Russell referring to our God and Savior, Jesus Christ as a "Master Mason". Is this not blasphemy of the highest order?
In case we missed the point, Russell expands on it, So you and I as under-masons are waiting for the return of our Master Mason, who gave his life on this very account in connection with this secret of the construction of the Temple, the Church."
Christ died for our sins to set us free from the condemnation of sin and death, not for secrets regarding the Temple. Russell is way off base from the gospel.
He goes on to equate the Christian walk with the degrees of Masonry saying, ".. we must go on to higher degrees, because those who are in the first degree practically know very little."
He then states again how exclusive he is in his own opinion, how clever, and how full of secret knowledge he considered himself,
".. Not everybody has the hearing ear and the seeing eye. It is only those who have come into this divine masonry that have this spiritual insight, and this spiritual guidance, and may know the things that are freely given unto us. It is something that is freely given to one class, and not intended for anybody else."
This mindset is with us today among the modern Jehovah's Witnesses and even the many offshoot sects from Russell. They believe their organization alone is "spiritually guided". They say they receive messages from angels given to the "remnant" (the privileged few who rule over the others). I suggest that they are spiritually guided by the forces of darkness, for who else would dare tamper with God's word on the subject of Jesus Christ, and the very nature of God!
As we read on in this amazing discourse to page 123, Russell reveals just how contaminated his brand of "Christianity" was when he made these statements.
".. You know our order is so secret we cannot know each other always. Is not that wonderful? I find that is so with with Masons also. Many Masons shake hands with me and give me what I know is their grip; they don't know me from a Mason. Something I do seems to be the same as Masons do, I don't know what it is; but they often give me all kinds of grips and I give them back, then I tell them I don't know anything about it except just a few grips that have come to me naturally.." Again, we have the admission from Russell's own lips that he knows nothing really about Masonic grips. It's interesting that both Russell and the Masons sense a brotherhood with each other - occult and pagan both! How deserving of each other they are!
Russell goes on to claim that the Apostle Paul was a thirty-second degree Mason in the Lord's order and bore the marks to prove it! He says the Masons are ignorant of the marks that Paul received.
Unbelievably, Russell makes salvation plea to his followers in these words, "Now have you taken the first step of humility to acknowledge your sins? Have you acknowledged you have nothing in your hand to bring to make you worthy to be accepted of God? Have you acknowledged that you are trusting in the precious blood of Jesus? Have you taken degrees? Have you said, Simply to Thy cross I cling? Have you taken that degree? Have you gone on then to say, Lord, I give myself to Thee? And have you received the initiation into this high degree in which you may be called a Priest, a saint of God, a member of the Royal Priesthood? I hope you have."
Did you ever hear such a garbled message of salvation, mixing the grace of God with occult Masonic degrees! It is truly shameful.
At the bottom of page 123, continuing on to page 124, Russell identifies a secondary class of Christians, not as spiritual as the Royal Priesthood, but going to heaven anyway. He calls them the "Great Company". This will come as shock to the present "Great Creed" who are told they can't go to heaven, but must remain on earth. The light just keeps flashing off and on doesn't it?
Page 125 tells that if we have on the "robe of Christ's righteousness".. All this past is under the blood; Jesus has made him whole; he is accepted as a member of this spiritual Masonry. Thank God!.. All of these spiritual Masons should know each other, not after the flesh but after the spirit."
After, the ungodly mix of Gospel and Masonry. The most deceptive teachings are those that mix truth with error.
Page 125 repeats much of what we have already covered. Page 126 was pictures, and the discourse concludes with page 127, which again exalts the heavenly "little Flock" and leaves the "Great Company" with spots on their robes and tribulation to go through.
I confess to feeling sick in my spirit as I read through this discourse. Charles T. Russell must have been a very charismatic man to sway a crowd who claimed to be students of God's Word the Bible. I could see myself leaping to my feet and shouting "heresy!" I'm a little late, but that's what I'm doing now.
I can only pray that this information will find its way to many modern Jehovah's Witnesses who revere this false prophet and his twisted teachings. I pray many eyes will be opened and modern JW's will begin an investigation into their roots. If the foundation is faulty, the structure is rotten to its core!
Can you a Mason and a Christian at the same Time?
You may be surprised to hear us call Masons "occult and pagan" in the preceding article. We have researched Masonry and provide the following quotes from "Morals & Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry" by Albert Pike, originally published 1871, revised 1950.
".. Every Masonic Lodge is a temple of religion; and its teachings are instruction in religion." (p. 213)
"..That rite.. declares that Masonry is a worship .. It is the universal, eternal immutable religion.. " (p.219).
".. The Teachers, even of Christianity, are, in general the most ignorant of the true meaning of that which they teach. There is no book of which so little is known as the Bible.. (p.105)
".. Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! It is he who bears the light.. ". (p.321).
"..Masonry is not Christianity! Please write for more information: MacGregor Ministries - Box 454, Metaline Falls, WA 99153-0454.[Source: MacGregor Ministries, Oct.Nov.Dec.2000 pp.4-6,27-30]

Why did Charles Taze Russell, founder of Jehovahs Witnesses, use this symbol ?

Steps of Freemasonry

Zion's Watchtower


Contact Your Senator

Click Here to Find Your Reps

Toll Free Numbers
(800) 862-5530
(800) 833-6354
(866) 340-9281
(866) 220-0044
Amnesty: The Plan To Destroy The USA
What is happening to the United States of American under the leadership of the Sellout Senate, the White House and its likely mirror image of support in the Open Border Democratic House of Representatives should spark immediate anger and action from all Americans.

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

New documents link Kissinger to two 1970s coups

Larisa Alexandrovna and Muriel Kane
Raw Story
Tuesday June 26, 2007

Release of CIA’s ‘Family Jewels’ provides insight into political juggernaut and Bush Administration adviser

Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger pushed for the 1974 Turkish invasion of Cyprus and allowed arms to be moved to Ankara for an attack on that island in reaction to a coup sponsored by the Greek junta, according to documents and intelligence officers with close knowledge of the event.

Nearly 700 pages of highly classified Central Intelligence Agency reports from the 1970's, known collectively as the "Family Jewels," are slated for public release today.

However, the National Security Archive had previously obtained four related documents through the Freedom of Information Act and made them public Friday.

“In all the world the things that hurt us the most are the CIA business and Turkey aid,” Kissinger declares in one of those documents, a White House memorandum of a conversation from Feb. 20, 1975. On the surface, the comment seems innocuous, but the context as well as the time period suggests Kissinger had abetted illegal financial aid and arms support to Turkey for its 1974 Cyprus invasion.

In July and August of 1974, Turkey staged a military invasion of the island nation of Cyprus, taking over nearly a third of the island and creating a divide between the south and north. Most historians consider that Kissinger – then Secretary of State and National Security Advisor to President Gerald Ford – not only knew about the planned attack on Cyprus, but encouraged it.

Some Greek Cypriots believed then, and still believe, that the invasion was a deliberate plot on the part of Britain and the US to maintain their influence on the island, which was particularly important as a listening post in the Eastern Mediterranean in the wake of the October 1973 War between Israel, Egypt, Jordan and Syria.

According to columnist Christopher Hitchens, author of the book The Trial of Henry Kissinger, "At the time, many Greeks believed that the significant thing was that [Prime Minister Bulent] Ecevit had been a pupil of Kissinger's at Harvard."

Several intelligence sources, who wished to remain anonymous to maintain the security of their identity, confirmed to RAW STORY that Kissinger both pushed for the Turkish invasion of Cyprus and allowed arms to be moved to Ankara.

However, a former CIA officer who was working in Turkey at the time, suggests that Kissinger's statement in the memorandum about Turkish aid likely means the Ford administration, following Kissinger’s advice, conducted business under the table with right-wing ultra-nationalist General Kenan Evren, who later dissolved Parliament and became the dictator of Turkey in a 1980 coup.

“The implication is that the US government was dealing directly with General Evren and circumventing the [democratically elected] Turkish government,” the former CIA officer said. “This was authorized by Kissinger, because they were nervous about Ecevit, who was a Social Democrat.”

“We technically cut off military aid for them,” the officer added, referring to an arms embargo passed by Congress after the invasion. “Technically… technically, but this would imply that the military and/or probably CIA aid continued even after the aid was cut off by Congress. This may substantively be what led to the overthrow eventually of Ecevit.”

According to the former CIA officer, Turkey’s democratically elected President Ecevit had good relations with the Johnson administration, but the Nixon administration, where Kissinger served as National Security Advisor and Secretary of State, had issues with Ecevit.

“I don't remember now what all the issues were,” the source said. “But I remember that the White House did not like Ecevit.”

Kissinger could not be reached for comment Monday.

Kissinger, Rumsfeld, and Cheney, then and now

Though no longer a government official, Kissinger remains a powerful force in Washington – particularly within the Bush Administration. Dr. Kissinger was the first choice by President Bush to lead a blue ribbon investigation into the attacks of September 11, 2001. However, he resigned shortly after the 9/11 Family Steering Committee had a private meeting with him at his Kissinger and Associates Inc. New York office and asked him point blank if he had any clients by the name of Bin Laden.

According to Monica Gabrielle, who lost her husband Richard in the attacks and who was present as part of the 12-member 9/11 Family Steering Committee during the private meeting, the White House seems to have overlooked Dr. Kissinger's apparent conflict of interest.

"We had the meeting with him... the whole Steering Committee, all 12 of us. Because we are basically doing our due diligence and asking for his client list to be released to see if there was a conflict of interest between his client list and potential areas of investigation," said Gabrielle during a Tuesday morning phone conversation, recounting the events of December 12, 2002. "We went back and forth with him, discussing his client list... asking him who was on it, if there were conflicts and so forth," she continued.

"Lorie [Van Auken] asked, do you have any Saudi clients on your list? And he got a blank look. Then Lorie asked, do you have any clients by the name of Bin Laden? And he was stuttering and mumbling, and finally said he would maybe, possibly consider releasing the client list to an attorney but not for the public."

Dr. Kissinger did not reveal his client list but withdrew his name the next day without public explanation.

In Bob Woodward’s State of Denial, Kissinger says he met regularly with Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney to offer advice about the war in Iraq. “Victory over the insurgency is the only meaningful exit strategy,” Kissinger said.

Cheney, along with former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, first came to prominence during the administration of President Ford. Rumsfeld had served in various posts under Nixon before being sent to Europe as the US ambassador to NATO in 1973, a period that included the Cyprus coup. When Ford became president on August 9, 1974, immediately preceding the second wave of the Turkish invasion of Cyprus, Rumsfeld returned to Washington to serve as his chief of staff, while Cheney became deputy assistant to the president.

Rumsfeld and Cheney gained increasing influence under Ford, reaching their apex of power in November 1975 with a shakeup that saw Rumsfeld installed as Secretary of Defense, Dick Cheney as White House chief of staff, and George H.W. Bush replacing William Colby as CIA director.

Together, Rumsfeld and Cheney created a bubble not unlike the one that has enveloped President George W. Bush’s White House, surrounding Ford with a close knit group of advisors who worked to head off any possibility of openness about past misdeeds and to turn the administration sharply to the right.

The aid to Turkey referenced in Kissinger’s cryptic remark was precisely the subject of Congressional oversight on the Executive Branch in 1974-75. In a foreshadowing of how Iran Contra would play out a decade later, the White House violated both US and international law in providing arms and financing to the Turks for the Cyprus invasion.

The CIA, through various spokespeople, would not comment on how much additional information with regard to Kissinger, the attack on Cyprus, and the events leading up to the 1980 coup in Turkey with US support would be part of the declassified documents to come out this week. The only thing the agency would say is that “this was a different CIA at a different time,” and “people need to remember that.”

The Chile Coup

Around the time of President Nixon's resignation in August 1974, investigative reporter Seymour Hersh started hearing accounts of illegal foreign and domestic CIA activities. On December 20, 1974, Hersh confronted CIA Director William Colby and received confirmation of everything he had learned. Two days later, Hersh went public with the story.

The Family Jewels were described in a New York Times front page article titled “Huge C.I.A. Operation Reported in U.S. Against Antiwar Forces, Other Dissidents in Nixon Years.” According to Hersh, James Schlesinger, who served briefly as CIA director in 1973, had ordered the report in response to the crimes collectively known as Watergate.

Hersh's article stated, “An extensive investigation by the New York Times has established that intelligence files on at least 10,000 American citizens were maintained by a special unit of the C.I.A. that was reporting directly to Richard Helms, then the Director of Central Intelligence and now the Ambassador to Iran.”

Then-CIA director William Colby's initial impulse was to reveal everything in order to give the CIA a clean slate, but President Ford and Kissinger disagreed. By January 3, 1975 when Colby was summoned to the White House for a briefing, they had decided to keep the lid on by forming a blue ribbon commission under Vice President Nelson Rockefeller.

The "memorandum of conversation" document released by the National Security Archive, dated January 4, 1975, transcribes portions of a follow-up meeting between Ford and Kissinger the next day.

Kissinger complains to President Ford about Colby's urge to come clean, saying, "You will end up with a CIA that does only reporting, and not operations ... He has turned over to the FBI the whole of his operation."

Former CIA Director Helms "said all these stories are just the tip of the iceberg,” Kissinger continues, adding “If they come out, blood will flow." After offering a few examples, Kissinger concludes by remarking mysteriously, "The Chilean thing -- that is not in any report. That is sort of blackmail on me."

The meaning of this remark is far from clear, suggesting as it does that the 693 pages of the Family Jewels were only "the tip of the iceberg" and that among what was left out was a "Chilean thing" that Kissinger perceived as having the potential for blackmail on himself.

It has been known since the revelations of the 70's that prior to Chile's 1970 presidential elections, President Richard Nixon, Kissinger and Helms actively pursued ways to head off the victory of leftist Salvador Allende, including sponsoring an abortive military coup.

"I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go Communist because of the irresponsibility of its own people,” Kissinger famously said at the time.

After Allende was democratically elected and became president, the US put economic pressure on Chile and encouraged further military plots -- a two-pronged strategy similar to that currently being employed against Iran -- while Kissinger a continued to press for stronger action.

The CIA's Directorate of Operations was particularly active in Chile in 1972-73, the period leading up to Allende's violent overthrow in September 1973 in a military coup led by General Augusto Pinochet. Following the coup, Kissinger strongly supported the new authoritarian government.

After Helms left the CIA in 1973 to become ambassador to Iran, he offered a series of vague denials when asked about CIA involvement in Chile. Among Helms' claims were "that the CIA hadn't given money directly to Allende's opponents, that the CIA didn't try to fix the vote in the Chilean Congress because investigation had shown it couldn't be arranged, that the CIA didn't try to overthrow the Chilean government because the Agency failed to find anyone who could really do it."

In 1977, Helms was convicted of perjury for his statements and given a two-year suspended sentence and a fine that was paid by his friends from the CIA. As with the more recent perjury of Vice President Cheney’s former chief of staff Scooter Libby's concerning the outing of a CIA officer, Helms' had lies served the purpose of protecting his superiors, notably Kissinger.

However, in Prelude to Terror, historian Joseph Trento offers a somewhat different account of Helms' actions, suggesting a deeper Kissinger involvement.

"From Iran, Helms heard enough about the criminal investigation to issue a threat through his old colleague Tom Braden,” Trento writes. “Braden remembered Helms saying, 'If I am going to be charged, then I will reveal Kissinger's role in these operations.'" Trento adds in a footnote that "Helms himself confided to old friend and CIA colleague (from Iran) Tom Braden that he would resort to [revealing embarrassing state secrets] and 'bring down Henry Kissinger' in the process."

Even apart from Trento's assertions, Kissinger's concern with "the Chilean thing -- that is not in any report" hints at involvement in the 1973 coup. But if Trento's claims are accurate, Kissinger might also have been referring to a threat by Helms to bring him down, both in his remark that "Helms said all these stories are just the tip of the iceberg. If they come out, blood will flow," and in his cryptic description of "the Chilean thing" as "sort of blackmail on me."

Cheney Author: 9/11 Didn't Change Cheney, Gave Him Opportunity ‘To Put His Views Into Action'

Think Progress | June 26, 2007

The Washington Post's four-part series on the influence and power of Dick Cheney reveal the tactics of a stealthy operator who prizes secrecy, kneecaps opponents, stifles dissent, and dogmatically pursues a rigid hard-right agenda.

Cheney has argued that his quest for war in Iraq, pursuit of torture, denial of due process to detainees, and advocacy for illegal wiretaps were all precipitated by the events of 9/11:

CHENEY: In a sense, 9/11 changed everything for us. 9/11 forced us to think in new ways about threats to the United States, about our vulnerabilities, about who our enemies were, about what kind of military strategy we needed in order to defend ourselves. [12/23/03]

CHENEY: I think 9/11 changed things to the point where we could no longer afford to ignore what was going on in Iraq. [2/23/07]

This morning on Washington Post radio, Barton Gellman — the co-author of the Cheney series — argued that based on his research of Cheney, he found “no evidence” that “9/11 exerted a profound psychological change on the Vice President.” Instead, Gellman argued, “[Cheney] has not changed his views very much over the years. What has changed is he has a greater opportunity to put them into action.”

Listen to the interview here


GELLMAN: It's been often speculated that 9/11 exerted a profound psychological change on the Vice President. But we did not find evidence that that's true.

There's a moment in the story in which we've got witnesses who are watching him watch the World Trade Center collapse. Everyone else in the room is groaning. And he doesn't blink his eyes. He turns around and starts working the phones again.

And what he's doing is he's finding that 9/11 confirms some long-held beliefs of his. And it gives him the opportunity to press through some long-desired changes. He has not changed his views very much over the years. What has changed is he has a greater opportunity to put them into action.

Monday, June 25, 2007

Cheney and Bush Declare Autonomous Dictatorial Powers

Exempt themselves from executive branch

Prison Planet | June 25, 2007
Steve Watson

The Vice President and the President have casually declared their offices to be independent of the executive branch and completely autonomous, with Dick Cheney also attempting to abolish agencies his office is supposed to be accountable to.

Last week the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform reported:

Vice President Cheney exempted his office from the presidential order that establishes government-wide procedures for safeguarding classified national security information. The Vice President asserts that his office is not an “entity within the executive branch.”

As described in a letter from Chairman Waxman to the Vice President, the National Archives protested the Vice President's position in letters written in June 2006 and August 2006. When these letters were ignored, the National Archives wrote to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales in January 2007 to seek a resolution of the impasse. The Vice President's staff responded by seeking to abolish the agency within the Archives that is responsible for implementing the President's executive order.

In his letter to the Vice President, Chairman Waxman writes: "I question both the legality and wisdom of your actions. ... [I]t would appear particularly irresponsible to give an office with your history of security breaches an exemption from the safeguards that apply to all other executive branch officials."

The documents released by the committee reveal that Cheney's office has not cooperated with an office at the National Archives and Records Administration which is responsible for overseeing the protection of classified material by the executive branch.

As the Washington Post further reported , Cheney's staff have consistently declared themselves above the law by not filing reports on their possession of classified data and even blocking an inspection of their office in 2004. The documents also reveal that after the Archives office demanded cooperation earlier this year, Cheney's staff proposed eliminating it altogether.

While Cheney has declared his office outside of the executive branch he has continued to receive funding from the bill that funds the
executive branch. Instead of challenging Cheney's absurd declaration of autonomy, House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel is now seeking an amendment to the Financial Services and General
Government Appropriations bill in order to cut the funding to Cheney's office and thus legally separate it from the executive branch.

"The Vice President has a choice to make. If he believes his legal
case, his office has no business being funded as part of the executive
branch. However, if he demands executive branch funding he cannot
ignore executive branch rules. At the very least, the Vice President
should be consistent." Emanuel has said.

In addition to Cheney's office declaring itself exempt from oversight, President Bush's office has also claimed it has the same status.

The LA Times reported :

An executive order that Bush issued in March 2003 — amending an existing order — requires all government agencies that are part of the executive branch to submit to oversight. Although it doesn't specifically say so, Bush's order was not meant to apply to the vice president's office or the president's office, a White House spokesman said.

It has now become chillingly clear that the President and the Vice President believe that they have absolute power over the Government of the United States and cannot be held accountable to anybody.

Previously Dick Cheney has declared both himself and Bush unaccountable to Congress , stating last year that "vice president and president and constitutional officers don't appear before the Congress.”

It is also now clear that Bush and Cheney have broken literally hundreds of laws because they see themselves as outside of them. Last April the Boston Globe reported :

President Bush has quietly claimed the authority to disobey more than 750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the power to set aside any statute passed by Congress when it conflicts with his interpretation of the Constitution.

Among the laws Bush said he can ignore are military rules and regulations, affirmative-action provisions, requirements that Congress be told about immigration services problems, ''whistle-blower" protections for nuclear regulatory officials, and safeguards against political interference in federally funded research.

The Constitution assigns power to Congress to write the laws and asserts that the president has an obligation ''to take care that the laws be faithfully executed." Bush, however, has repeatedly declared that he does not need to ''execute" a law he believes is unconstitutional.

Take the "torture ban", which was approved last year, for example. After approving the bill, Bush issued a ''signing statement " giving his own interpretation of what the law meant and giving him the right to bypass it if he so wished.

Bush and Cheney are vastly expanding Presidential power and creating provisions that set their offices up as dictatorial bodies.

Just last month new legislation was signed which declares that in the event of a "catastrophic event", the President can take total control over the government and the country, bypassing all other levels of government at the state, federal, local, territorial and tribal levels, and thus ensuring total unprecedented dictatorial power.

The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive , which also places the Secretary of Homeland Security in charge of domestic "security", was signed on May 9th without the approval or oversight of Congress and seemingly supercedes the National Emergency Act which allows the president to declare a national emergency but also requires that Congress have the authority to "modify, rescind, or render dormant" such emergency authority if it believes the president has acted inappropriately.

Journalist Jerome Corsi , who has studied the directive also states that it makes no reference to Congress and "its language appears to negate any requirement that the president submit to Congress a determination that a national emergency exists."

In other words the new directive excludes Congress altogether from governance in a state of emergency.

While alluding to the "enduring constitutional government", the directive actually ensures the end of constitutional government as each branch, the executive, legislative and judicial, are stripped of equal authority and must answer directly and solely to the President.

The mainstream media has not reported on the directive and the White House has refused to comment.

Last month it was also reported that a high-level group of government and military officials has been quietly preparing an emergency survival program named "The Day After," which would effectively end civil liberties and implement a system of martial law in the event of a catastrophic attack on a U.S. city.

Though anathema to any notion of liberty or freedom, this new legislation has not come out of the blue, it is merely an open declaration of the infrastructure of martial law that the federal government has been building since the turn of the last century, which was first publicly codified in the 1933 war powers act under Franklin D. Roosevelt.

Senate Report 93-549, which was presented at the first session of the 93rd Congress, outlines just a handful of the declared national emergencies or martial law declarations that preceded the latest one.

"Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency. In fact, there are now in effect four presidentially-proclaimed states of national emergency: In addition to the national emergency declared by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933, there are also the national emergency proclaimed by President Harry S. Truman on December 16, 1950, during the Korean conflict, and the states of national emergency declared by President Richard M. Nixon on March 23, 1970, and August 15, 1971."

In alliance with these open declarations of martial law and the 1947 National Security Act, bills such as the Patriot Act, the John Warner Defense Authorization Act and the Military Commissions Act have all put the final jigsaw pieces in place to complete an infrastructure of dictatorship since 9/11.

We're already living under an infrastructure of martial law and have been since 1933, all that remains for it to be fully implemented is a big enough natural disaster, mass terror attack or other catastrophe that will cause the necessary carnage and panic that affords the federal government enough leeway to implement open dictatorship with the least possible resistance.

New revelations that Cheney and Bush have openly declared themselves to be have total power and the ability to bypass law and oversight should be a code red emergency. They are moving to implement everything necessary for a total takeover should a catalyst event provide the opportunity. Given that this administration has a history of cooking up its own catalysts we should be very wary indeed.

Sunday, June 24, 2007

Seduction of a Generation (Sensitivity Training, Brainwashing)

Very prophetic filmstrip from 1969, narrated by G. Edward Griffin, about the use of sensitivity training as a tool in social engineering.

Saturday, June 23, 2007



Where should the USA invade next for war on terror?

Americans are NOT stupid - WITH SUBTITLES

20/20 Stupid in America

Miss Teen USA 2007 - South Carolina answers a question

Beit Shalom Ministries

Iraq: The death Of Reason

Iraq: Death of Reason has now been released to the public by Voice in the wilderness productions. This stunning new film attacks the Evangelical Church’s error in supporting the war in Iraq. Produced and directed by Raymond Schwab and Elliott Nesch of Beit Shalom Ministries, Iraq: The Death of reason addresses just war theory, Abu Ghraib torture, depleted uranium, the deceptions sold to the American public by the Bush administration, false flag operations, war profiteers and calls the Christian church to reconsider their position, since prior to invasion 79% of evangelicals supported military action.

Denver to D.C. Walk for Truth EPISODE ONE

First installment of the Denver to D.C. update. Brother Raymond and Brother Elliott of Beit Shalom Ministries walk from Denver, CO to Washington D.C. preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ, protesting the evangelical support of the war in Iraq, and demanding an independent investigation into the 9/11 attacks. God is love, Jesus is His Son!

Denver to D.C. Walk for Truth EPISODE TWO

"THE MYTH OF AMERICA." Raymond and Elliott document the police state takeover of America and the myth of freedom. Watch as they and an independent documentary crew are harassed and asked for their papers 6 times in 10 days by police officers while committing no crime. Also, witness the thuggish tactics of Kit Carson County Sheriff Deputies, which forced the duo to file a criminal complaint. Plus, an interview and refutation of the prosperity gospel leaders false teachings. Welcome to the new America! Repent and believe the Gospel. Real Christians don't choose war! Stop the 9/11 cover-up! Jesus is Lord!

Friday, June 22, 2007

Nazis: The Occult Conspiracy

Nazis-the occult conspiracy is a documentary about how the Hitler and the Nazis made use of occultism to win the war, and to remind the Germans that they were the best humans on the planet, the master-race. There are better documentaries around, but this is a solid documentary. There are many rare pictures from Nazi-Germany to be seen here, and you get to learn more about the religous beliefs of nazi-leaders like: Hitler, Goebbles, Göring, Hess and Himmler. I can`t advice people enough to watch documentaries about Nazi-Germany, because they show how crazy and evil humans can be.

Free Speech Under Attack By Powerful Interests

Al Cronkrite
Monday April 16, 2007

“Some of the press who speak loudly about the freedom of the press are themselves the enemies of freedom. Countless people dare not say a thing because they know it will be picked up and made a song of by the press. That limits freedom.” Geoffrey Fisher, former Archbishop of Canterbury

The recent brouhaha over New York shock jock Don Imus’s description of C. Vivian Stringer’s Rutger’s Scarlet Knights women’s basketball team which has been encouraged, and exacerbated by the press and media appears to be another attempt to breach the First Amendment and stifle our right to free speech.

Three groups have been responsible for pushing this agenda: Jews, Blacks, and homosexuals.

Much of this insult-hysteria is rooted in the promotion of the hallowed Holocaust which has been propagandized as if Jews were the world’s only victims of mass genocide.

The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob is my God. My Savior, King Jesus, sits at his right hand. His Holy Spirit guides my steps and blesses my life.

When I was a new Christian, tears often welled up in my eyes when I spoke with Jews. Though they consistently rejected the Savior, I was envious of what I considered their proximity to Him.

The infinite, omniscient, omnipresent, sovereign God selected Abraham, and since He chose to reveal Himself through Abraham and his progeny, He is referred to as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. However, the One True God has no particular ethnicity. Since He created the world and everything in it, He cannot be proscribed as a Jewish God.

Jesus was nurtured in Mary’s womb from the seed of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. If the Holy Spirit planted a fertilized seed, Jesus was not Hebrew; if He fertilized Mary’s seed He was half Hebrew when He lived as a man here on the earth.

God created a great nation from the progeny of Abraham and blessed them and their nation with every blessing. In return He required obedience to His Laws. When their disobedience was beyond mercy, in His infinite love and wisdom, He sacrificed His only Son that their sins might be forgiven and they might again draw near. When they rejected His Son, God created the Diaspora in fulfillment of His ancient and repeated promise.

Now, no man can come to the Father except through the Son and those who have access to the Father are called Christians. Tragically, many Christians have never appropriated the doctrine of “choseness” and still follow what God has rejected.

When the new nation of Israel was created there was great fanfare among these deceived Christians who, not understanding that the Biblical prophecies had already been fulfilled, seized on them as current and became major supporters.

Zionism is a highly charged issue for both Jews and pre-millennial Christians. For international Jewry the new nation offered a sentimental haven from pandemic persecution and for Christian supporters it represented a fulfillment of Biblical prophecy and a precursor to the return of the Savior.

The Holocaust and the manipulative propaganda that has followed has provided the Zionist agenda with a powerful generator of sympathy and support. The intense, entrenched, emotional dogmatism squelches civil discourse.

Jews have been major supporters of Blacks. The marriage had its ups and downs and has ended in divorce but during its tenure Jews were instrumental in the promotion of Black rights for several decades. The NAACP was founded in 1909 by an ethnically diverse group. Wealthy Jewish interests provided substantial financial help and in 1914 Joel Spingarn, a Jewish professor at Columbia, became Chairman of the Board and for the next fifty years he and later his brother, Arthur, controlled the organization.

In his informative book “Broken Alliance” Jonathan Kaufman writes, “Jews wrote most of the checks that bankrolled the fights of Martin Luther King and his Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC); of SNCC, the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee; and the Freedom Rides of James Farmer and CORE (the Congress of Racial Equality). Ever since the early years of the NAACP more than fifty years before, with a Jewish president and, a few years later, a black national organizer, leading Jews on the board of directors, and a vocal black membership, blacks and Jews were linked in the fight to end racial discrimination.” Read the review here.

Having no obligation to children and family, homosexuals are a wealthy group. Their wealth has been supplemented by the support of powerful Jewish interests in the press and media and millions of dollars coming from the Ford Foundation, the Tim Gill Foundation and others. The ACLU supports NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association) and itself enjoys heavy Jewish support. For additional information click here.

Recently Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Peter Pace said in an interview with the Chicago Tribune that he supports the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy in the Armed Forces and believes "homosexual acts between two individuals are immoral and that we should not condone immoral acts". With obvious intent to create an uproar the Jewish owned Washington Post came out against General Pace claiming the General has a right to his opinion but strongly inferring that he should not express it. Read Cliff Kincaid’s essay here.

In Sweden a Christian Pastor was arrested for preaching the Biblical mandate against sodomy. The Swedish Kalmar Court verdict against Pastor Green reads: “It is the opinion of this Court that Åke Green, through his statements, has deeply offended the homosexuals as a group and the purpose of his sermon was clearly aimed at showing disrespect for the homosexuals as a group.” Read the story here.

The United States press and media are big supporters of homosexuals. Television displays it openly and the newspapers give it favorable coverage. Both the press and media are under heavy Jewish control. (Read details here.)

A year or so ago, sixty-seven year old Ernst Zundel, a rabble rousing, anti-Semitic Nazi , married to a United States citizen was extradited to Canada on a minor immigration violation, shipped from Canada to Mannheim, Germany where he was “convicted on 14 counts of inciting hatred for years of anti-Semitic activities, including contributing to a website devoted to denying the Holocaust — a crime in Germany“. He was sentenced to five years in prison. Read the story here.

British historian David Irving was incarcerated for over a year in an Austrian prison for denying the accuracy of the six million figure commonly associated with the Holocaust. His sentence was three years but he was released on appeal. The Austrian law targets "whoever denies, grossly plays down, approves or tries to excuse the National Socialist genocide".

In the United States, public opinion is melded by a monopolistic press and media. The power to control information in an information oriented society is a very great power indeed. This power can create a major issue from an insignificant slip of the tongue. It can create enough votes to elect a politician or enough to defeat him. It can make a disaster seem like a triumph or a triumph seem like a disaster. It can create ignorance by not publishing events and create confusion by publishing too many. It can be a force for morality or a force for degeneracy. When this strategic power falls into the hands of a small group of fantastically wealthy individuals who have an agenda, great oppression will result. That is the situation in our world today.

An analysis of the free speech issue plainly reveals a conspiracy to attack free speech at the international level and a substantial involvement by wealthy Jewish interests to promote this tyranny.

Is it not strange that any question concerning the Holocaust can result in criminal charges, that echoing the words regularly used by Blacks can result in one losing his livelihood, that preaching against homosexuality is a crime in some quarters - is it not strange that denigrating Jesus is a popular sport regularly played by Hollywood, the press, and media with no chance of any sort of retaliation? Something is radically wrong here!


New 9/11 Study Has Direct Links To Government, Pentagon Black Ops

"Independent" study financed by Feds

Steve Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, June 22, 2007

A newly released Purdue University animation showing how fire caused the collapse of the World Trade Center towers on 9/11 claims to be independent but in reality has been federally funded and was conducted by individuals with direct links to the Pentagon and the White House.

Earlier this week we covered the news that the new study roughly correlates with the findings of the 2005 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) report and supports the official line that the airplanes stripped away crucial fireproofing material and that the weakened towers collapsed under their own weight.

While the New York Times today lauds the study as "a counterpoint to the conspiracy theories promulgated by such outspoken figures as Rosie O’Donnell", has actually done some research into the origins of the study.

In addition to the inerrant flaws and conflicts we pointed out in our previous article, it has now come to light that the so called "independent" structural engineers behind the study are anything but.

The Study was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), a federal agency created by Congress in 1950 "to promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense…".

The board of the NSF was appointed by George W. Bush and confirmed by the United States Senate. Its director, Dr. Arden L. Bement Jr, has worked for the Department of defense, where he was under secretary for research and engineering, and DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), which is responsible for the development of new technology for use by the military and famed for its black op projects and offshoot offices.

Last year the Bush Administration doubled the NSF's budget to $6.02 billion.

At the time Arden L. Bement, Jr. stated:

"This is a great day for NSF, and that means it's a great day for the nation, there has been a lot of rhetoric about doubling the NSF budget, but now the Administration is behind it. The FY 2007 Budget Request is the first installment. We are grateful to the Administration for its recognition and leadership,"

In addition it turns out that structural engineer Mete Sozen, the lead investigator in the Purdue study, was also on the American Society of Civil Engineers research team that confirmed the government's story about the OKC bombing in 1995, despite the huge amounts of inconsistencies and conflicting testimony.


From the ASCE web site

Mete A. Sozen, Ph.D., S.E.
Kettlehut Distinguished Professor of Structural Engineering, Purdue University
Specialty: Behavior of reinforced-concrete structures

Dr. Sozen is currently the Kettlehut Distinguished Professor of Structural Engineering at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind. Prior to joining Purdue in 1994, Dr. Sozen was a professor of civil engineering at the University of Illinois for over 35 years. Dr. Sozen also served on the ASCE team that studied the Murrah Federal Office Building collapse.

So while it claims to be independent the study was in fact funded by the government and carried out by long time government hired hands. The study clearly set out not to attempt to discover anything new but to prove the preconceived official fire theory.

Again this underscores the fact that a truly independent investigation into 9/11 is the only way the mountains of evidence pointing towards a controlled demolition will even be considered.